this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
277 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

10267 readers
717 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 60 points 2 days ago (32 children)

IMO every city should have public cafeterias that:

A) Grow / process ingredients onsite (greenhouse), or source through a local network.

B) Provide nutritional food free of charge

C) Create entry level jobs that teach practical skills such as cooking and horticulture.

D) Increase food security. Global agriculture supply chains are about to be completely disrupted by climate change.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sorry, we'd rather keep paving over farmland to make unaffordable mcmansions because our leaders cannot fathom a country that is self sufficient where values aren't constantly increasing

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

B-bbut where will we put all the over priced shoeboxes for better offs from out of town to party in?

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Or allowing our wealthiest to buy up all the farmland so they have complete control of everything...like a feudal king.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Who's afraid of a little competition?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Landlords, mostly.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago

Galen Weston

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's tough. Co-ops I've checked out are all about organic, which is cool but they're more expensive. I've looked at farm stands and Saturday markets but they're are more expensive too.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Not to mention that a farmer's market vendors can just lie about the origin of their products.

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/1.4313073

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I think people have to realize that capitalism has made us search for cheap over quality and nutrition when it comes to food.

Food is literally one of two things that keep us alive and thriving yet we balk at food that is slightly more expensive but much more nutritious, lasts much longer and requires less volume to feed one's self due to this nutrient density vs. Commercially grown food, that has been transported thousands of kilometers to your local store.

You can't afford the increase in price to buy quality food? That has nothing to do with the food, what or costs or what you should be buying or eating. It's capitalism keeping you part of the slave class and making you think grocery store prices are normal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dumples@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have found that my local co-op has some great prices for some items and others that are more expensive but it depends on what I need to purchase. Their bulk teas are such a good deal and really the only place I can buy bulk teas. Their bulk goods are a good deal as well. Some of the fruit and vegetables are a good deal unless its not in season. Their bread (freshly made from a local bakery) tastes amazing and a great deal as well.

That being said I don't love their meat selection (smaller selection, more expensive but has a few gems), nor do I like to buy their boxed standard goods. Broths, snacks, canned goods or anything like that is more expensive and doesn't seem worth it for the quality difference. The key is to find a few anchors that get you there. I don't go as often to my co-op compared to my local trader joes.

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is partly because there is no good supply chain or real wholesale market for mid priced consumer packaged goods. It's essentially completely owned by the ogilopolies.

There is for produce and meats which share the supply chain with restaurants.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

Makes complete sense to me. Its also lots of work to create some of those goods at home. I refuse to make my own broth despite everyone saying its easy and delicious. I don't have the time nor do I want to store it

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What we need are co-ops. Unfortunately it's hard to run one of those. They tend to not make so much money.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Maybe as a nation, we shouldn't be letting profits get in the way of feeding people? Just a wild suggestion.

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

How would this change the price?

The bloat is in the middle of the supply chain so unless these people avoid the middle man such as people who control the meat processing... There is limited impact having the retail handled by the state

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

in the middle? you mean the middle who also owns the start and the end supply of almost everything?

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago

They don't own the start, the farmer does and they get fucked by the middle man too.

Essentially guy doing logistics and processing internalize all of the value within the chain via monopoly powers.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

AFAIK the retail side in Canada is also making significant profits. Those could be removed or significantly reduced from the prices of a public grocery store. This would decrease prices in the short term. The oligopoly could then increase their distribution side profit margins, forcing the public stores to increase prices. This would make a very strong case for the comprehensive public solution that also tackles distribution. If you tackle just distribution, there's nothing discouraging the retail side of the oligopoly from cranking up their profit margins immediately. In effect, retail prices wouldn't increase, but the oligopolies would absorb the decreased distribution price difference. Then they'd get their politicians to say - see gov't wasted billions on this scheme and nothing changed, time to scrap the public distribution company. Ideally a public option should tackle both retail and distribution in one go in order to realize lower prices curbing the oligopoly's ability to prevent that via the distribution or retail sides.

E: I guess the oligopoly could instantly increase distribution margins in the first scenario too. Independent grocers would probably scream, but I don't know if that would be a significant impediment. I think it would be more difficult for the oligopoly to instantly stop any price decrease due to retail profit elimination, but I'm not certain lower prices would hold long enough for the public to take notice and oppose the inevitable calls for dismantling public distribution. So yeah, a public option would most likely have to have public distribution to succeed.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ever heard of a co-op? They usually deal directly with the providers. No middlemen.

[–] barfplanet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've worked with co-ops both on the retail grocery side and ag aggregator side, and the traditional supply chain is similar. The ag co-ops serve as a middleman, and the retail grocery will usually deal with a distributor.

The grocery co-op had way more direct accounts (hundreds) than a traditional grocery, but that was mostly for smaller company specialty goods. The vast majority of the product moving off the shelves was bought from one of two big distributors.

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Not sure why you got down voted buts the current supply chain.

Not sure how it would change since they are already taxing people on food but it would need to be cheaper than the grocery store.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

Seriously. Owning the logistics and distribution would do more, probably. And even then not for everything. You have to assume for anything manufactured the cost would get shifted around.

Frankly, the biggest difference I see around me is living in a place where the producers get direct access to customers AND where foot traffic is king. I've gone back and forth from rural to urban living spaces and here in the rural area I am now the big game changer is you walk up to a market and buy from fishmongers that bought fresh fish directly at auction and grocers that got a lot of the produce directly from the producer/farmer. And then there's enough people around in a small enough space that you can go to a supermarket for the packaged product and to a market/grocer for the fresh or specialty product.

The model where people drive to a shop and expect to find everything in the same place is a nightmare for pricing on both ends of things.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lol... That's a place where affluent people feel "authentic"

They are hardly cheap and that's the point

Modern farmers market is yuppie exercise

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That’s not the case everywhere, sucks to live In a sucky place, don’t project your issues on the rest of world. The farmers markets in Canada are farmer selling their produce, it’s cheaper than big box stores, and they take all the profit themselves other than rent for a stall.

How do they work in your country?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Honestly where I live, farmers markets are often the same price, sometimes a bit more and actually sometimes a bit less than a lot of grocery stores. All our groceries have to be shipped on a boat so it actually often is cheaper to grow and buy local.

Either way I prefer to give my money to the "yuppies" than to fuckhead billionaires like Galen Weston and Jim Pattison. I acknowledge that's a privelege but I also won't shit on people who make the same choice or who can't afford to make that choice. The problem is not any of us, it's the price-fixing ballsacks.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

… farmers markets don’t work without local farms…. Lmfao what a take.

They will also also have cheap seasonal food, if you want out of season, it’s always going to be expensive. Sounds like people here don’t understand how farmers market actually work and expect them to have the same options as the big box stores…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›