Canconda

Thanks for the suggestion! My buddy farms quail!

I reeally want to try pickled eggs but years of watching the Simpsons have me thinking about the nasty jar of eggs in Moe's tavern.

One day I'll get over it.

Making your own pickles is surprisingly easy FYI!

Plus once you have a pickle jar you can just add more cucumbers so you never run out!

This entire paragraph is an appeal to authority that doesn't even engage the subject at hand.

Love this guy!

Well worry not. I'm gonna block you cuz you don't have much to say that interests me.

Explain how that's relevant.

you seem to be following me around different Lemmy communities with a 3-hour-old account. Any reason for that?

WTF no I'm not. I'm replying to you on this post.

It's a small ass community. If you're posting lots than we're gonna cross paths.

edit: ohhhh you posted the linked in post as well. Ya no I'm not following you. Hadn't even realized you were the same person.

you're OK with it because you like the policy.

That's not what I said. You need to differentiate between acknowledgements and endorsements. Those statements are facts, not my wishes.

You sound like someone who's never been in a position of responsibility. Who's never had to make a decision knowing that someone would be upset or even harmed.

I have written multiple letters regarding Bills C-2 and C-5 griping their lack of oversight and potential over reach. Also wrote letters about his whole, "No budget" plan.

This is policy. We can hold our politicians accountable without devolving conversations to gossip and ad hominins.

I agree with this. I think a lot of Carney haters conveniently forget who Poilievre is. But in general every good point this blog post had to offer was buried underneath writing that shouldn't have been cut out in a draft.

1. Right leaning people are still people/canadians whose needs and contributions matter. Appealing to them is not the same as doing their bidding.

2. Transitioning to renewables doesn't mean zero new oil/gas infrastructure. 100% renewables is simply NOT an option yet. Given the world's tendency to adopt Canadian standards, there are positives to Canada becoming an energy leader.

Making everything about the party leader is the level of thinking that MAGA operates on. I simply cannot respect opinions that ignore the larger context and conflate individuals with entire countries.

Yup. Here's my thoughts on those.

1. DGAF bout stampede and pancake flipping

2. DGAF bout stampede and pancake flipping

3. Only mention of replacement in that article is union saying AI cannot replace them. IMO we need more AI tools in public service.

4. The expectations being unrealistic are your allegations. Based on what I've read from you, you're wholly unqualified to make those kind of determinations.

5. Broken Link. I'll assume it's your opinion that the timelines are unrealistic.

6. Canada's steel/auto sectors are highly integrated and interruption is going to have massive ripple effects in the Canadian economy. So yea Carney is meeting with their CEOs. NEXT.

7. Our legislature has been largely ineffective and it's Clear the CPC/PP intend to continue gridlocking our government. Shifting power from the house is hardly the biggest problem with C-5. Further illustrating that you're not writing this article objectively but with a specfic target in mind.

8. An amendment gets voted down and this relates to pancakes HOW? At least this is a legitimate concern about C5. Albeit a widely discussed one.

Honestly that's as far as I got. I have concerns about bills C-2 and C5, but the way you're trying to connect this to Carney personally is a waste of my time as a reader.

You absolutely lost me when you started trying to call out his financial holdings. It's right there in his response... Is Pierre Poilievre on the up and up with his stock options?

If I had written that and submitted it to my English teacher he would have told me to delete 80% and do 3 more drafts.

This whole thing comes off as a Carney hate piece with zero objectivity. You need to appreciate that the people taking the time to read articles are likely going to be turned off by blatantly biased writing.

I personally am only bothering to respond because clearly you put some effort into this, and maybe you do have something valid to say. But you got some work to do first.