this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
59 points (98.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39334 readers
1471 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Depends on by whom and how long. The US produces a lot of things but also imports a lot of critical goods and materials as well.

If Canada, Mexico, China, and the EU & UK all banded together for sanctions or embargoes? The US economy would be pushing daisies pretty quick. Especially if the actions were coordinated and did not give the US time to react and adjust.

But the countries issuing those actions wouldn't be in good shape either. Trade wars are a 2-way street.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would anyone bother with sanctions? Nothing a foreign government could do would be worse than what our own is doing.

Just wait it out and hope you manage to find a way to secure our nukes after everything disintegrates.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To encourage the revolt of the increasingly dissatisfied American public.

And for those who say "that's not going to happen", you do not speak for the rest of us. There is absolutely unrest. The news cycle does not reflect reality.

[–] Pirky@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Can confirm about the unrest. My friend group is discussing these events daily. And a few of them are actually going out and protesting. I'm likely to join in this summer.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Would also depend on how captain dipshit responds. This could be interpreted as an act of aggression considering he and his cronies are itching for a reason to invade somewhere

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All talk.

Been around plenty of disordered folks and he fits a very specific bill.

He's chickenshit. Lotta threats but won't follow through. His reputation is everything to him, but he will absolutely turn tail and run if he is challenged by a more powerful opponent. He will absolutely hold a grudge and try to get revenge in a """sneaky""" way, but he's still an absolute fucking idiot.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ultimately I agree with you but if I’m a leader of say, Canada or somewhere in the EU I wouldn’t bank on it

For one I’ve also been around many “disordered folks” as you call them (outpatient therapist) and rhetoric can escalate. This is a common behavioral pattern called an extinction burst. You stop giving into his bullshit? That’s the most dangerous time of all. Even putting that aside there’s just the risk of him getting escalating amounts of unchecked power. Those threats might get cashed once he decides he wants to check and see if he can actually get away with it.

But that aside it’s not him as much as the entourage. There’s a group behind him and some of them are clearly looking to push him towards alienating the us from all their allies. He doesn’t work in a vacuum. He has a bunch of people saying “maybe you should do this”. He even has people saying “you have to do this, I gave you x million dollars”. Again, if I’m leading Canada this is what truly worries me. Trump may be a chickenshit but the warhawks behind him that want to sell a bunch of military gear and get contracts are frothing at the mouth for this kind of thing.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely. He's a puppet.

But I firmly believe that a bully that faces no consequences will continue to escalate.

Cut off the US. Support the people's protesting. Trust me when I say that there is more opposition than ever. Even in my ultra-conservative town, the flags have disappeared. It's getting..... interesting.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

To be clear I agree with you still. I think they should do it but I think they won’t

I am an American and this action will cause me pain but I think things need to get worse here unfortunately. I think the only potential silver lining of this situation is that it may get so bad that people finally develop a bit of class consciousness and demand change.

I do not hold out hope for this though, and even if it does occur I do not hold out hope that it sustains beyond our four year election cycle. Power forces and moneyed interests working against it and such. But it would be nice

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anything is an act of aggression with them. The only tong you can do that they won't call an act of aggression at this point is rolling over and giving them your country.

It's abusive tactics 101, the only way to stop the abuse is to do the things they don't want you to do, even if it gets worse first.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think aiming to sanction the US is the wrong plan, treat it like it is what it is - a country run by an autocrat, and go after the oligarchs. Same approach as taken with Russia, North Korea, Iran, etc.

In terms of effectiveness. Frankly we're (globally) only getting rid of Trump and his cronies if the American public rise up against him and oust him through whatever means that may take. Protests and extended strikes for starters - and the people will be more likely to band together with Trump than against him if the whole world starts Tariffing and sanctioning the USA like a rogue state.

On the other hand, sanction and freeze Trump & Co. assetts all over the (western) world and when he retaliates to protect his own interests its a lot harder to sell to his constituents.

How you would even legally go about that is another question though, he would have to be breaking financial international laws and the countries involved in the personal sanctions would have to be ready and willing for blowback.

Its all fantasy at this stage until he starts blatantly breaking international laws that allow his assets to be seized. Likewise with the idea of US sanctions - look at how much Israel has done and they're not sanctioned, and it took a great deal of blatant acts of war before Russia and North Korea were sanctioned also.

[–] vvilld@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Right now, it would likely harm other countries at least as much as the US. We're just too interconnected into every aspect of the global economy. Cutting off the US cuts off a lot of services that other countries rely on.

But, Trump's current foreign policy is driving countries away from the US fast. Give it a few years for countries to disentangled themselves from the US and it would likely be more effective without harming themselves in the process.