this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33735 readers
1526 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 68 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Encryption. For the poors, that is.

[–] Typewar@infosec.pub 14 points 3 hours ago

It still sounds so insane. Imagine it being illegal for us two to share some public keys. It's like banning fundamental maths

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well okay then, use steganography.

Secure Space Encryptor (https://paranoiaworks.mobi/) is one that I know and they have source code published, although I personally don't understand coding so I can't guarantee how secure it is, but its been out for like a decade and I haven't heard anything bad about it, and its on F-Droid.

They won't know you are secretly sending an encoded "ATTACK AT DAWN" message hidden inside the cute cat photo. (I mean unless they just shut down the entire communications infrastructure and even ban mailing stuff, which is unfeasible because of the economy)

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

They'll use ai to do pattern matches on available data to assassinate leaders of dissent or those capable of organizing resistance. Knowledge of encryption is uncommon enough of a population to be an acceptable cost.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 40 points 5 hours ago

Liberty and privacy. And it will take way less than 50 years.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 37 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Civillian use of Drones.

I'm very certain there's gonna be a 9/11-like terrorist attack involving drones and then governments all around the world are gonna get extremely paranoid and just ban it unless you get a special permit that only big corporations can get.

[–] Univ3rse@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm honestly surprised we haven't seen an assassination by drone from a nonstate actor yet. It's cheap, would subvert many of the protections aimed at stopping shooters, and security likely wouldn't react in time or have the equipment to effectively stop it.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

We don't have the clearance. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 32 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Dissent against the government.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Already illegal here in the uk to protest climate change.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Or to protest against genocide

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 4 hours ago

Unlocking your bootloader

[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 23 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Free expression, freedom of speech. Privacy. Home ownership.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

I don't think americans will have to wait 50 years :(

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 23 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Driving your own car.

But not in a good way. You’re expected to just die.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Disagree on the last part. They want to erode ownership. Driving will be a subscription of some sort.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Poors will be priced out by insurance companies. A large auto manufacturer, probably Tesla will buy one of the enormous insurers and start by offering lower rates for self-driving. Many will sign up and the standard startup playbook will follow. Personal vehicles will become luxury items and then you will be required to subscribe.

I wonder what the poor right will say when they don't own their car anymore?maybe they will have f350 self-driving trucks too and it'll be ok.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm hesitant to call what they are doing owning anyway, re: their trucks. Most people who drive those idiotic money pits are so far underwater on their loans I only have pity for them. I know people who have taken out 8 year loans on 70-80 thousand dollar trucks. Loans so high in interest and so long that they probably will never pay it off - to me the bank owns it 100%. I think most of them will gladly hand over their ownership if they can still feel "manly" by pretending their huge truck makes up for their own masculinity issues.

[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 1 points 22 minutes ago

It’s insane how much trucks have skyrocketed in price! My wife’s job occasionally needs a truck so we had considered one as our second vehicle years ago and ended up figuring it was cheaper to own a car counting total cost of ownership unless we used the bed/hitch more than 3 times a week and that was at 40-50k… it’s like they’re allergic to money.

[–] suspicious_hyperlink@lemmy.today 23 points 5 hours ago

Dumping junk in space

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

Certain food additives.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 12 points 1 hour ago

Emulators. There's a crack down that continues to happen as old systems become streaming services.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I would hope being rich, but I'm not counting on it.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

Being poor is already pretty illegal with no signs of changing

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago

A lot of activity on the Internet

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 7 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago) (2 children)

Leaving your house without your papers and government issued ID.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 minutes ago

I don't usually like SovCits, but like maybe we should really start popularizing SovCit movements. 🤔

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

Or, you know, just being alive without them.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

fingers crossed for child marriage becoming illegal (and in less than 50 years. the sooner the better)

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

All the above, but probably in 5 years.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Positive: ecocide universally accepted as criminal and backed up with meaningfully disincentivising penalties

Negative: being remotely off grid in any way. Probably a symptom of me being British, but I fully expect there to be a point where we're required to be constantly tracked (location, what you consume, what you see, etc) in real time and it'll become a crime to evade it.

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Modifying most things (cars, android ROMs, PCs, etc.) It is right now to an extent but it will probably get worse.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Being trans, wait you said 50 years not 0.5? Haha lol we're so fucked

[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 35 minutes ago

Nah we'll win

We got this, and we got eachother.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 2 points 59 minutes ago

Owning real estate. Similar to being a “qualified investor” today

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Literally anything given that time period

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

"The year is 2075. Yesterday was the day the last legal thing became illegal. And what was the last legal thing, you ask? The answer is obvious in retrospect. It was law itself."

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

In the US: Not wholly illegal but I predict erosion of the 4th amendment under the guise of keeping the country safe. I predict the definition of a "reasonable" search and seizure will expand.

Across the world: as someone else mentioned, encryption is going to start getting a lot more attention as well.