this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
291 points (95.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

36329 readers
1399 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PS DefenSe in the us.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a fairly recent development. It was created as the department of war by Washington and remained that until 1947 where it split into the departments of the air force and army, joining the already existing department of the navy, which together made up the national military establishment (NME), which was renamed 2 years later to the DOD.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago

Oddly enough, this also coincides with the time when the US military was more explicitly about offence rather than defense. After the Revolution, people mistrusted the federal government having a large standing army. The army was raised up in time of war, and everyone went home when it was over.

Post-WW2 was the first time the US kept a large army in "peace". Been that way ever since.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • Military-industrial complex
  • War machine
  • Merchants of death

There are many names.

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

A way of keeping people employed usefully in many highly skilled jobs so you don't need to give them social security payouts for being jobless. In this way it is a truly excellent idea.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

The problem is that it happens at the expense of other jobs, and the lack of transparency makes corruption way too easy.

[–] fujiwood@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

"The Ministry of Peace"

-Orwell

[–] Sergio@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the War Room!"

[–] tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

funny how the israeli military is called a "defense force". haven't been doing much defending.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

I have been calling them the genocide force for the past year

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Old joke from when I was in engineering college.

What's the difference between a electrical engineer and a civil engineer?

One builds the bombs one builds the targets.

[–] teft@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The US used to have the Department of War. Then it split up after WWII into the departments of the army, navy, air force and the overseeing department was renamed the department of defense. Probably a branding thing.

edit: a word

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve always heard to it referred to as the “military industrial complex”. Eisenhower tried to warn us about it in the 1950s.

[–] teft@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

Smedley Butler was warning us in 1935. War is a Racket .

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

"I didn't shoot a baby, I neutralized a threat!" - the IDF

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They also cause Famines, Plagues, and Pestilence. They have whole departments devoted to nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.

They're not a one trick pony.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

For countries like Finland, the Ministry of Defense is not about offense, and is very heavily armed.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

You're talking about the same industry that coined the term "preemptive strike" instead of calling it what it is: starting a war.

[–] troed@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah ... no.

Ask Europeans if they feel working in that industry right now feels like anything but for defensive reasons.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Indeedy, my wife works for the German army.

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Protecting your own country doesn't always involve actively declaring war with everyone. Often it's economic or cyber infrastructure hardening related

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 7 points 1 day ago

It was the department of war but the government decided that that name was too honest, makes the corpos look bad too

[–] SeraphimNova@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The attack industry

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gentlemen! There will be no fighting in the War Room!

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

WWII was the war to end all wars, so we couldn't have a department of war anymore. Still "needed" and army , navy, marines and all the weapons for them though so we created the department of defense.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Defense does also do defense in a lot of cases

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That would imply someone attacking first, no?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, the US has countries and dictators taking pot shots at us all the time.

US tech was/is being used by Ukraine to shoot Russian missiles out of the sky

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

On the first case, the actual United States territory? Or like US bases in other countries?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Then it's not really on topic...

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago
[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone who works in said US defense industry here

Neither defense nor war really apply to what we do, but between the two defense is the more apt description. The DoD largely uses a strategy of deterrence, where the technology we develop and training done for the "war fighter" is just public and visible enough that no other major country wants to take the risk of going into full open conflict with the US. Since most efforts go into deterrence, and deterrence is a defense strategy, it does become the more appropriate word.

Sure the US loves its proxy wars, but those don't throw the entire nation into wartime. Plus, in a round about way proxy wars help with the deterrence since we get an outlet for the decades old stock piles of arms that we no longer want and want to replace with the new stuff. If our waste products are being useful in places like Ukraine, it helps build up an idea of what it is we keep for ourselves, again building up a deterrence of openly and directly attacking the US

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Sure the US loves its proxy wars, but those don’t throw the entire nation into wartime.

because keeping the wars 'over there' and impacts from said conflicts minimal on the populace (no drafts, no rationing, no sacrifices) makes it easy to send the youth to be blown up in far off places.

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

What I was referencing by proxy war was Ukraine and what Israel was supposed to be. The US sends arms to another nation with the intention that the other nation, who is already in conflict (or just happens to be through dubious and convenient circumstances) will take those arms and give political adversaries a bloody nose or serve as enough of a distraction that they won't come after the US and keeps the US from putting boots on the ground. Is working out quite well for us in Ukraine, Israel was supposed to distract the middle east but turns out that when you hand a genocidal maniac a bunch of weapons, he's gonna do maniacal genocidal things with them. Who could have possibly guessed

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Regardless of what you call it, making the production of weapons an 'industry' is psychotic.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

let's look at how well it worked out when a country turned over it's nuclear weapons and relied on treaties to keep it safe.

load more comments
view more: next ›