this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
109 points (100.0% liked)

News

27658 readers
3806 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump has intensified his opposition to nationwide injunctions, calling for Congress and the Supreme Court to limit district courts' power to block federal policies nationwide.

These injunctions have repeatedly halted Trump’s second-term initiatives, including attempts to end birthright citizenship and deport migrants under a 1789 law.

Trump’s administration argues that these orders undermine executive authority and seeks permanent relief to restrict their use.

The Supreme Court has expressed concerns but has not yet ruled on the issue.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TingoTenga@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But nationwide injunctions are totally fine when issued in Texas to block student loan forgiveness or reproductive rights.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This could be a good thing. Trump doesn't realize he is stripping the ability of the 5th circuit to be assholes at scale.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Oh that would still apply. It's the application of law that defines the new American caste system.

/s

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Our objective, one way or another, is to make clear that the district courts of this country do not have the authority to direct the functions of the executive branch. Period,"

Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Miller is such an ass. I'm sure he is smart enough to know he is spitting bullshit.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

The lawbook is the same, as is any judge's role to oversee/uphold such law... But that's inconvenient information.

So, as usual they use nice and plausible sounding words, but the end of the matter is that someone needs his decrees to be above (judgement against) the law......

Slowly taking away local judges' (and states) rights to review nationwide law and only rule on local matters while the king decides is a callback to the middle ages.