this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
270 points (94.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

36329 readers
889 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: We survived an ice age and we're very highly adaptable. Plus, we will hold on to some percentage of technical knowledge that will help us adapt faster.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 54 points 1 day ago (5 children)
[–] baconmonsta@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let the shower wash away your tears...

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I want a refund on this "no tears" baby shampoo. Didn't do a damn thing for my depression.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would belong on Twitter, if it was 10 years ago and not full of nazis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's where I go to cry when it's not raining. :(

[–] Nay@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago

It just hit me in a sobering sorta way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

“The planet will be fine. We’re fucked.”

— St. Carlin

[–] Nay@feddit.nl 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

St. Carlin

100% . I love to see it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (8 children)

No species lasts forever—and the faster their environment changes, the sooner their expiration date.

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When faced with a changing environment, a species has 3 choices: Adapt, Migrate, or Die.

Humans have apparently decided to vault past the first two and just yank that third lever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Those other species weren't the authors of the global ecosystem's demise, even with an understanding of the situation and opportunity to change the course of events

Not really a fair comparison, is what I'm saying.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Depends on what you define as "lasts forever". We are direct descendants of some kind of a rodent. Yeah, our species has changed "kind of much" since those days, but I wouldn't worry about that kind of "expiration". We are some rodents' grand-grand-grand-...-grandchildren, and I think the rodent would be very much okay with us not looking very squirrellike, if they somehow was to find out they are our ancestor. They'd love us all the same :)

But of course, in our case, it won't be that evolution changes us into something else. It's rather, we will just vault 92'ify ourselves.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My bet for climate change is a massive migrational crisis and wars over resources.

Humankind won't disappear, not even civilization. But life would probably be shit, and many many people will die.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

I think a lot will depend on whether nuclear wars break out but yeah, even in the worst case scenarios I don't see civilization dissappearing entirely. And honestly it all kinda makes sense to me. Nature has to regulate itself somehow. If one species becomes too dominant things get tipped out of balance. If you have an infection because an organism that is usually present in small numbers on your body has turned predatory and is growing beyond sustainable levels you develop a fever until things are back to normal. It's the alternative to dying. (Matrix Elrond had it right)

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Climate change is an ongoing process that takes decades to centuries. That's very fast as far as evolution and natural climactic shifts are concerned, but on a human scale long term. Given that it's not stopping within the lifespan of one person, and contributes to virtually every health problem in subtle ways, it'd seem a bit difficult to say if a given person has "survived it" or not, even if they live to an old age.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I'm not sure exactly what you mean regarding health and lifespan, but I think looking forward from 2025, things are quickly going to go off the rails. We've already been seeing severe problems resulting from climate change for years now, and I think that it's going to rapidly get worse within the next 5-10 years. I'm not talking about sea level rise (except in very vulnerable places that are already partially underwater, like Florida), but about intensifying weather disasters, droughts, and shocks to the global food supply. As a result of this, I think we will see more and more unrest as well as authoritarianism used to deal with that unrest. How quickly all this is going to decimate the population is anyone's guess.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m so glad I don’t have any kids. That failure was a blessing in disguise

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Humanity will likely survive climate change.

I like your optimism, but I don't share it. We honestly don't know, one way or the other. What we do know is that human extinction in on the table and growing in probability. When I look at human actions as our cumulative knowlegde of these risks grew, well, I'm not exactly confident our species will make it.

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Plus, we will hold on to some percentage of technical knowledge that will help us adapt faster.

You're running off the assumption that the survivors know useful information and that theyre also able to utilize that useful information plus be able to source needed materials since they wont have travel

Example: I know I need an antibiotic for my infection but I dont know how to create that antibiotic or how to guide someone on how to make it. If I did know id also have to get lucky that the region I live in has all the materials needed to make it. We source all around the world for our stuff.

Likely humanity will survive but probably wont advance as fast as you think.

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The available worlds looked pretty grim. They had little to offer him because he had little to offer them. He had been extremely chastened to realize that although he originally came from a world which had cars and computers and ballet and Armagnac, he didn't, by himself, know how any of it worked. He couldn't do it. Left to his own devices he couldn't build a toaster. He could just about make a sandwich and that was it.

-Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Arthur Dent realizes that he, as an individual, is pretty useless for improving a society, but he can make a damn fine sammie.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the TED talk (really)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fdnomad@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When we experience and maybe survive the next mass extinction, its going to be vastly more difficult to reindustrialize / redigitalize even if knowledge persists because we've already extracted the most easily accessible materials from the earth and extracting resources is becoming increasingly difficult.

If you know how to build a battery but you cant build the machines to get the lithium, you just cant build a battery. But I suppose over time we'd find better ways to recycle.

[–] scott@lemmy.org 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Climate change is just the tip of the big white iceberg

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yep. It doesn't count any of the other huge problems we're creating.

  • Our farming techniques deplete the land and turn it to desert
  • Over-fishing/hunting have led multiple animal populations on the brink of collapse. Even a small change could end it.
  • We're very close to depleting aquifers all over the globe. Once those are gone we don't have anything to drink or to water our crops.
  • We're poisoning the skies and waterways with toxic chemicals, plastics, and forever chemicals.
  • We're breeding antibiotic resistant germs and modern travel allows viruses to spread worldwide in hours/days

We're rushing towards our destruction in multiple ways. Any of those alone would result in massive deaths. And as resources get tighter, disputes and wars will break out over what's left.

All of these together will nearly certainly lead to our destruction. And this is going to start hitting hard within 5-10 years.

[–] scott@lemmy.org 4 points 1 day ago

I said the same thing 5 years ago and guess what? It's already hitting hard. Look at America right now, just black bagging people off the street.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

The saddest part is that we have the technology and means to fix any and all of these, just not the desire.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Democracy and capitalism won't survive. 100 years from now we will all be north Korea. 1000 years from now we will all live in medieval feudalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 8 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

If, in some cataclysm, all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to the next generation of creatures, what statement would contain the most information in the fewest words? I believe it is the atomic hypothesis that all things are made of atoms — little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into one another. In that one sentence, you will see, there is an enormous amount of information about the world, if just a little imagination and thinking are applied.

Richard Feynman

So, if, during the apocalypse, you have access to a means of passing on a message to the poor bastards who have to live in the New World, it should be this:

"Everything is made of atoms"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

the vast majority of humans didn't survive even before anthropogenic climate change

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The majority of humans won't survive the next 100 years, because almost nobody lives to be 100.

Do you mean that the majority of people currently alive will die due to climate change?
Do you mean that humanity's population will drop by over 50% and will not recover?
Do you mean that in the future, the majority of deaths will be due to climate change, even in 200 years from now when the new (much hotter) equilibrium will be all anyone has ever known?

[–] YknsNMo000@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 day ago

I don't care if I don't survive but I'm taking a couple of polluters with me lmao

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

It depends on which kind of climate disaster we're facing. If it's reversible over the next million years, humanity as a species should be fine. The population would be cut down to just a tiny fraction, and the survivors might have to start from pre-industrial tech level.

If it's irreversible, and the Earth becomes a Venus like hellscape, the whole planet should be pretty much sterilized. Good luck surviving that.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't like this shower thought. It puts bad vibes out into the world and I'm not about that right now. Im having a good day for once, lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 2 hours ago

One half of us die, the other half will be happy with the results. To bad it won't be those who denied and brought the problem about

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Some humans will survive but, with the state of the world today, I think we're already pretty close to losing our humanity.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

We killed millions of species to make the rich richer, but some humans survived so that's nice

load more comments
view more: next ›