Tuuktuuk

joined 2 weeks ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

Many European countries have patriot missiles. They probably not allowed to be exported anywhere without a permission from USA, and if you ignore such an export restriction, you'll end up in trouble when trying to procure arms the next time. Or, might end up. After what Trump's done, it could very well be that this would be considered a force majeure situation. We are defending ourselves from the Russia, and of course we must be allowed to use our AD missiles for that.

So, we should probably just send to Ukraine all patriot missiles we have got and immediatelly order a lot of NASAMS and IRIS and SAMP platforms and missiles to replace them.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 week ago

The dashed line means the path is a guess. When the plane stopped sending GPS signals, Flightradar draws a straight dashed line to the direction the plane was heading to when losing the contact, and continues the path on the same speed until the real location of the plane is known again.

And then the dashed line moves to go to where the plane has actually gone in that time.

So, the plane hasn't been there, this is just how Flightradar reacts to the Russia's GPS jamming.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what world leaders are using, though.

In this case Ukraine gaining support by communicating using a medium used by international diplomacy outweighs the cons of Twitter getting more visibility.

Politicians should migrate to other platforms as well, but Zelenskyj is about the last person to have to take the first step!

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

If Musk was to tamper with Zelenskyj's visibility on Twitter, it would get noticed. It would probably backlash quite big time.

Still, it would be awesome if world politicians could please migrate to Bluesky or even Mastodon. Maybe write all messages in two systems until the migration is reasonably ready.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Through the whole of 2024 the Russia was advancing faster than anyone expected.

During that year, they managed to occupy 0.7 % of Ukraine's territory. Which basically rounds to zero.

the Russia now works mainly without military vehicles. Even if there was a complete collapse of the Ukrainian front, the Russia would be less able to exploit it than they were able to advance in northern parts of Ukraine in spring 2022. I'd say that the best the Russia can do is to advance about ten times as much as in 2024. That is, they could maybe occupy another 7% of Ukraine's territory. USA can of course try helping by lifting the sanctions, but EU won't coöperate with that.

If USA blocks Ukraine from getting air defence missiles, the Ukrainian electricity distribution will be in deep trouble. Not the end of the world right now, when it's already spring in Ukraine, but the next winter might get seriously bad even if the Russia has already lost by that point.

If the EU stays supporting Ukraine, it won't lose before the Russia does. But it might be in for its most painful year in this war 😢

💛💙 Дякую, Україно! 💛💙

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tanks: that's a good number. The Russia is producing 150 tanks per year, so 11 in just one day is a great amount!

I'm especially happy about the over 60 artillery pieces – remember, although the Russia isn't getting halfway as much ammunition as it would need for another Bakhmut, its biggest problem is with artillery barrels. And this helps them get rid of their barrels!

107 vehicles is okay. There's a campaign for destroying Russian rubber-tyred logistics, so this number should be retained constantly at a high level.

The 1050 for soldiers is dangerously low. The Russian army basically gains a few hundred soldiers for each day where it loses only 1000. Not a catastrophically low amount, but a little bit under the sustainable minimum. Hopefully it will grow again!

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think it's mainly about a relative lack of drones. They do have a lot of them, but each attack takes several. Remember that these drones are purpose-built devices varying in size from half a metre to over five metres, not civilian quadcopters.

Secondarily, you indeed need to locate the logistics bases, and the you need to observe them to know where the target is being stored and figure out what is the target's weakest spot.

But mostly it's a matter of production capacity. They build enough drones to make an attack, then they attack. And then they need to wait until they have enough for the next attack. It works, because replacing an ammunition depot takes far longer time than replacing the drones used for destroying it.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Every day the Russia is not stopped makes a nuclear war more probable. This has been said since 2022, and it remains true.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

That's precisely what was said in the comment you replied to.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

The number of soldiers sent this time was estimated by the South Korean intelligence service to be between 1000 and 3000 soldiers. It doesn't make a dent to DPRK's military, and it also doesn't affect the war against humanity very much, because the Russia loses that many soldiers per day or two.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They've got tens and tens of this size, but not hundreds and hundreds.

One such explosion destroys typically ammunition worth a couple of weeks of use. It does hurt the Russian military quite nicely, but it's not something that alone could end the war. It's one of the many things that, when all done, will together win Ukraine the war.

It forces the Russia to send more meatwaves, which is a good thing: their ability to recruit soldiers has not been able to increase from the level of 25 000 to 35 000 per month, so if mire than 1000 soldiers.are removed from their army per month, their army shrinks.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

I don't think this one was dementia. Qt least not primarily. He's used to gaslighting in his personal life, and here he's simply gaslighting the whole world on television. If there's some dementia to this, then that is not to understand that you cannot gaslight a million people at once, because the point of gaslighting is to make its victim think they are going crazy and imagining things.

Though... Can it be that for the MAGA audience this gaslighting does work and they really will believe Trump has never called Zelenskyj a dictator?

 

The text manages to be quite surprising to me.

There was talk about USA wanting a share of Ukraine's mineral wealth, but this agreement looks more like an agreement about funding of Ukraine's reconstruction. It says that half of all income that Ukraine will free from the Russia will have to be put in this fund, but if the fund will be used for reconstructing Ukraine, how does this benefit USA?

Maybe it can be used for building mines for American companies, for them to use for free? Or maybe the fund can be liquidated and the money shared between Ukraine and USA?

But, my untrained eye cannot really recognize whatever shenanigans there might be hidden in the text.

view more: next ›