this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
228 points (99.6% liked)

Canada

10206 readers
736 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US have a monopoly on credit card payments with Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Diners Club, etc.

Even with online payment systems like PayPal, GPay, Apple Pay.

The only Canadian option that I know of is the new Shop Pay, which is owned by Shopify. (And we all know the founder CEO, Tobias Lutke is a far-right fascist traitor who loves the idea of being a 51st state.)

Right now Visa and Mastercard are controlling what stores can sell, and what services can be provided. Censoring online content, like asking Steam and Itch.io to remove certain games.

What are examples of alternatives in other countries? I know that Japan, for example, has their own independent ones, I think?

Do you think they might be refused by American companies in order to keep their monopoly?

I'd like to know what you think.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 76 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We have one. We don't use it for credit cards but we could if we wanted to. We use it for debit transactions.

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And it is orders of magnitude cheaper for retailers than credit cards.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The problem is there's no incentive to use it, as you don't get the kickback your credit card provides. I'm not sure how the CC duopoly tricked us into disallowing retailer cash/debit discounting.

[–] nul42@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

I use debit whenever I can. The incentive is to not hand over 2 to 3 percent of my economy to foreigners who contribute nothing.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The discounting part isn't really true as of 2022.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/credit-card-surcharge-faq-1.6610356

The only significant revenue streams for most credit card issuers is Interchange fees, Annual fees and Interest. As only a lower flat network fee exist for Interact, merchants are the only ones that would logically offer anything for customers using them. But the difference really doesn't seem to be worth them bothering giving people 2-3 tier level pricing.

To put it into numbers at $100 transaction it's like 6 cents for a interact and $1.5-2 fee for a credit card.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Appreciate the clarification. Guess I missed the memo when they changed that a few years back!

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The incentive is to exchange money for goods without having to carry cash around. Like yeah you get points and shit for cc transactions but if you can’t see that the customer is not the one who benefits and it is merely a tool to drive engagement then I can’t help you.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, for me it literally makes all my purchases 1% cheaper for zero cost so long as I pay the full amount monthly, which I do. It'd make no financial sense to not take advantage of it.

This IMO is part of the problem, because I'm incentivized to take money away from local businesses and give it to the CC duopoly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Your credit card kick back has a yearly fee, and possible interest. They hope you over spend

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not all CCs have annual fees. I've got one with no fees and I still get 1% back.

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it just sucks that we are all paying about an extra 3% more on everything we buy to cover the interchange fees charged on credit transactions, even if we pay cash. It's built into all the pricing. Years back, there were places that would discount a price by 3% if you paid cash, but I haven't seen that in years. Best we can do now is get a cash back card to recover some of the loss. The annual fee cards usually get you more back, so if you use a credit card for everything you can, you might be further ahead.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

No fee is goos. With my spending that 1% would get me $200 back at end of year LOL.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's the thing. I don't. I make a shit ton of extra cash with bonus points to a point where I can pay off a plane ticket when I go on vacation. That's a pretty big incentive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fourish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mine has no fee and I pay it completely every month so no interest. It’s a good place to be. Just perks for purchasing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's not the kickback, it's giving access to my bank account that I'm trying to avoid by using a credit card as a middle man

Yeah, having someone bigger on your side when a purchase goes sideways is a big perk.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Eh, sorta.

We have digital payment cards in Interac. A bunch of the chip components come from other countries though, and are part of an integrated supply chain, if that matters. You're right though, that a chip card / payment card, is 'technically' functioning very similarly to a credit card these days.

Where they're different is in the settlements and insurance side of the transactions. Debit cards are nearly instant settlements in most cases, and require funds to be present in accounts. Credit cards allow for delayed settlement based on statement reviews -- so you can challenge bogus payments later, at your convenience, in theory. Both provide a degree of insurance, but generally the CC is better on that front -- this is also likely why they're much more broadly accepted in online payments.

Debit cards can theoretically be sync'd up with a personal loan, to function similar to a credit card in that you can "spend" money you don't "have" -- but doing so would require adjustments to Interacs terms, and likely trigger non compete clauses with Mastercard/Visa for anyone tryin to go that route. In terms of that 'credit' though, on a debit card it'd be entirely the liability of the bank/credit union issuing the card -- with a proper 'credit' card, that liability/risk is essentially offloaded to a larger company that can accommodate larger risk, albeit with higher % interest across the board.

Another fun one though, if you're thinking credit cards.... is that Canada should have its own Canada-focused Credit Bureau. Using US companies like Equifax, means all your credit information is already in the hands of the US Government, even if they have "canadian" wings, due to the US's Cloud act. Same goes for our government / institutions continuing to use things like Microsoft clouds -- all that data is just exposed, and Canada's doing/done nothin about it. There're fairly clear reasons the US considers Canada their bitch, I mean, our own government/regulators literally cannot function without US tech companies supporting them / providing them with service.

*just an edit to add another fun situation to watch in the financial area -- all the Credit Union mergers goin on, and what's happening in that space. Canada's credit unions are generally outsourcing their online banking applications to either the USA, or India. Even more hilarious, is that mergers are being effectively 'forced' by CEO's chasing golden parachutes. I know of at least one medium sized CU in BC who's CEO is an absolute idiot when it comes to outsourcing, and is well known as such by many -- for a smaller CU, she started emulating the outsourcing habits of big financial institutions she was hoping to merge with for that golden retirement package like a decade ago. Literally doing onboarding to such products with those big future merger partners, because it was a done deal before it ever went off for a vote to the membership. She picked up ridiculous operating expenses, which the CU couldn't really control -- like paying hundreds of thousands of dollars per year for Salesforce, with its 6% YoY increase, is 'surprisingly' not a sustainable smaller business thing to do. But she turned around and used that OpEx to go to the membership later and say "We can't possibly continue to operate, look at our ballooning OpEx! We need to merge with bigger CUs!". It's sorta a 'starve the beast' type tactic, done to the disservice of the membership, and for the personal profit of the CEO. And our regulators are cool with it -- hell, our regulators are encouraging this sort of thing, just like they're encouraging selling every Canadians online banking login authentication process off to the USA/India, at least one of which is a country totally not known for any kind of fraud industry what-so-ever, no ethical concerns, and who's never been connected to assassinations on Canadian soil. I mean, when I bank with my local Canadian community credit union, I obviously expect the USA or India's government to get access to my data.... and that's LARGELY because the BIG credit unions like Vancity want it that way, and have forced it on every other CU. There's even at least one BC CU that's given an India-based AI company access to practically all their member information from the sounds of things.

Like the trade association (Central1) is controlled by those big CUs, and it handles most settlements. Rather than maintain their geo-distant data-centres on different sides of the country, they're just sticking it all into Microsoft's cloud. So even all the cheques and payments that get processed, are within reach of the US govt due to the Cloud act. Regulators are 100% cool with it, cause the regulators are literally in Microsoft's cloud too, exposing all the personal data they take from the industry to US interest already. The BC regulators literally demand all private information for every person that has an account at a Credit Union, for vague "risk" reasons -- they post that openly on their BC FSA website, in guidelines/requirements for industry; I've previously poked the OIPC about it, and the Privacy Commissioner apparently doesn't see anythin wrong with it. And this shits literally happening like this year, while the govt is busy pretending to be all "elbows up"; they're continuing on with rampant rubber stamping of the outsourcing of core / critical canadian functions to foreign interests.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My chequing account is tied to a credit margin. Any overdraft is added to the credit margin which I can pay off later.

The other thing about CCs is the security of having extended warranties, travel insurance, fraud protection, etc.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Interac has things like extended warranties and fraud protection, it's just not 'generally' as good. Like here's one from a mid sized CU in BC, community savings, talkin bout some of the perks. The extended warranty part reads as:

Extended Warranty doubles the repair period on a manufacturer’s authorized Canadian warranty up to two extra years for purchases made worldwide. It covers products with a manufacturer’s authorized Canadian warranty of five years or less.

That coverage is better than some CCs from what I can tell, as many CC's cap it at one extra year.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago

That's pretty damn good!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Canada doesn't need its own payment system.

The EU does and we'll just be compatible. That's best.

Base it all on the euro just to kickstart the greenback's tumble from international relevance.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 9 points 2 days ago

I'd still prefer something independent from other nations.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think we need our own everything. If it isn't being done in Canada and we are relying on someone else for it, we should be on that whenever and as soon as possible. Especially considering how unstable the geopolitical situation is.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

We're also an international destination for education, travel, and business. We absolutely could present an alternative to VISA and expect international participation.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Don't get all isolationist, my friend. Having domestic options is a good idea, but you will be dependent on international countries somehow. And that's true for the world, right?

So, maybe soften your stance. Or don't, as you prefer.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

I read their comment as proposing to aim for potential self-sufficiency. That doesn't necessarily imply isolationism. Developing homegrown options isn't mutually exclusive with global trade.

It can just mean having domestic alternatives to assert our sovereignty in case, say, a fascist movement takes over the government of our largest trading partner with who we share the world's longest border, or something like that. Purely a hypothetical, of course.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I see no reason to soften my stance as it isn't isolationist to say anything we can do on our own we should be doing on our own considering the unstable geopolitical climate. That's true for every country, wouldn't you agree?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know that Japan, for example, has their own independent ones, I think?

Many companies have payment methods like QR codes that link with bank accounts (or require manually topping up in their own system from your account via transfer or ATM) and we have that in Japan. I'm not aware of any credit card that isn't using the VISA/MC/Amex infrastructure (unless you want to count gift cards that only work in a specific store). I don't know if the QR codes work at all for online stuff (I'm a luddite about that stuff: cash and credit work fine for me).

The other thing to note that, even were Canada to create its own domestic network, travel becomes harder for Canadians until/unless any common networks integrate with it.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Don't we have JCB? Is that piggybacking off MC or Visa's infrastructure?

And yes, you can do online payments using stuff like PayPay.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I did a little bit of digging (I checked before my comment and noted JCB asked the user to pick Visa or MC, but didn't dig deeper). Apparently, they do use their own network domestically, but overseas they user partner networks (Amex, Discover, UnionPay, etc.)

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Very cool. Thank you for doing the digging!

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Credit card charges need to be transparent and charged directly to the user and not the merchant. Otherwise there is no downward pressure on pricing and Canadian consumers will continue to get ripped off.

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's one thing to add to the list to boycott the US. Stop using visa and mastercard and use debit instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 hours ago

Interac needs to enter the credit card market.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not just Canada. It's almost the entire world. Many Asian countries rely on Alipay, the rest of the world is under the control of US payment systems. Even in European countries the UK based Maistro has been replaced for Visa or Mastercard.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

I know. It's ridiculous.

[–] drewaustin@piefed.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Not a horrible idea.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

India has RuPay & UPI. But let's say you want something FOSS then try GNU-Taler

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Discover Financial Networks was for sale. But instead of Canada buying it, it’s now owned by capital one. Gotta be quicker next time!

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Diner's Club"? What year is it? 1987? That's the last time I remember a business actually accepting that card...

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Hahahahaha I dunno I saw a sticker for it somewhere recently. I also had one when I was working at Deloitte for expenses.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

Nothing's going to beat GNU Taler.

load more comments
view more: next ›