this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

17268 readers
822 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

"Fruiting bodies," even

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Strawberries, blackberries, mulberries, and raspberries are not berries.

Bananas, aubergine (eggplants), oranges and grapes are berries.

Dangleberries aren't real berries either.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

It's almost as if excluding due to arbitrarily drawn lines is a bad idea. It helps nothing, it only serves to hurt ~~people~~ food.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I have the last pane spoken with an old man voice living in my head rent free for some reason

It's alarming the rate at which it just pops up

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure pumpkins are berries.

[–] potoo22@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

The true misconception is that there are scientific definitions and culinary definitions. No the culinary definitions don't fit their scientific category. They're not intended to.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

I was literally saying this about the mushrooms the other day!

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think I've ever considered a mushroom a vegetable, they're just mushrooms

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] placatedmayhem@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fruits vs vegetables is an arbitrary, near-meaningless distinction. See here: https://youtube.com/watch?v=E8mcTIEVKUU

[–] Fairgreen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No a fruit is a biologically defined thing right? On the vegetables I'm with you

[–] placatedmayhem@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The video addresses this. The biological term "fruit" is not accurate for culinary use. Lots of things we eat are biologically fruit, but you'd get weird looks for calling it a "fruit" while eating it. The video gives a lot of examples of botanical-fruit-but-not-culinary-fruit, including cucumbers, peppers, corn, eggplant, peas, pumpkins, and broccoli (specifically the buds).

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (19 children)

The whole fruit/vegetable controversy only comes because we're trying to use two different domains of terms interchangeably: botanical terms and culinary terms.

Tomatoes (and squash, and pumpkins (which, side note, are a type of squash), and cucumbers) are botanically fruits, but culinarily they're most commonly used as vegetables because they tend to be less sweet, particularly when raw. Mushrooms are botanically...well, I guess they're botanically "n/a", as they're not a part of the plantae kingdom, but whatever--they're typically considered botanical, so they're "botanically" fungi, but culinarily they're most commonly used as vegetables (or, interestingly, as meat replacements).

We get into the same linguistic confusion when we start throwing around "peanuts aren't nuts, they're legumes!"--botanically, yes, peanuts are legumes, but culinarily they're most commonly used as nuts. See also: "green beans" are botanically pods, not beans, but we use them culinarily as vegetables; and many "berries" are botanically something else but we use them culinarily as berries; meaning they're often left whole, mixed with other berries in the same dish, and go well with cream in cold summer desserts.

The whole thing is a misguided exercise in pedantry; "technically burritos aren't sandwiches, they're meat-sacks!" They're both, and we instinctively understand that trying to compare the two terms is silly because "sandwich" is a culinary term and "sack" is not.

Another funny part of this is that pedants are trying to say that tomatoes are (botanically) fruits and not vegetables, but the closest thing to a definition we have for "vegetable" botanically is "literally all plant life and maybe also some fungi," so tomatoes are clearly both fruit and vegetable botanically. Plus, they're culinarily used as vegetables, but can also be used as fruits in some cakes, pies, sorbets, and so forth (and isn't ketchup just a tomato smoothie?), so tomatoes are clearly both fruit and vegetable in culinary terms as well.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

good post, sounds like a copypasta

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Alas, it's all me. I...tend to be a bit verbose.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh--and thanks! I think that's praise, at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

It is a bit weird that we use some fruits as "vegetables", like tomatoes and cucumbers. But, other fruits like mango or raspberry are so different from your typical "culinary vegetable" that you have to be very careful in how you use it in a savoury dish. There isn't the same crossover for other edible plants. For example, I can't think of any tuber that could sneak into a fruit salad unnoticed.

I guess it comes down to there being a lot more variety among fruits than other edible plant parts. Plus, humans have been tweaking edible plants for millennia. So, who knows, maybe the original cucumber was more "fruity", but has been tuned over the years to be more "saladey".

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Definitely interesting. I wonder if there might also be a little bit to the fact that botanical fruits are basically just the best way to house seeds so that they'll have some energy to grow when planted, which means that it's independently evolved in a lot of different plants; so the culinary diversity of "fruits" is much greater.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that seems likely to me too. Especially because some fruits are designed to appeal to animals who will eat the fruit and then poop out the seeds somewhere, and different fruits will appeal to different animals. A fruit "designed" to be spread by birds will be different to one "designed" to be spread by a hippo.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kingofthezyx@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Great post, with one caveat

the closest thing to a definition we have for "vegetable" botanically is "literally all plant life and maybe also some fungi,"

I got my degree in Ecology and Evolution, and we always used a similar working definition but it was "edible parts of a plant which are not fruit." So basically botanically, stems, roots, leaves, flowers, and all subvarieties of those are vegetables. Fruits are fruits. Fungi are fungi.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I am 100% with your well written explanation here!

Just one 'nitpick', that isn't really even a nitpick because you did qualify the relevant part with 'tend to be':

A properly grown tomato absolutely can be so flavorful, sweet, tangy, varied, complex... that you could just eat it like an apple.

Not as sweet as most apples, but way, way more sweet than the typical mass produced tomato you're likely to get in the US.

I've been to a few farmers markets where... a couple of smaller farms were growing just absolutely stellar quality tomatoes.

...

On the other hand, squash and zucchini, even the fancy ones from farmers markets?

Main difference I noticed was basically perfect ripeness, they still just taste like nothing.

(I guess I should also point out this was from 10ish years back, sadly, a lot of farmers markets now have a lot of people basically just reselling some particular, slightly higher quality but still mass produced fruits and veggies, than aren't even local)

...

Finally, to throw more insanity on this terminology dumpster fire...

Corn.

Corn is arguably, from different domains of technical or colloquial meaning... a fruit, vegetable, and grain.

After millennia of us artifically selecting (and then just outright genetically engineering) what was originally, basically a kind of grass, we now have something that is now so sweet, that the US uses it to make HFCS, a cane sugar substitute... and then we jam that HFCS ... into bread, soda, everything.

So... ketchup... is then roughly a tomato/corn smoothie, made primarily from two... frui-getables.

Yep.

Fruigetable.

(froojzh-tah-bull)

((im too lazy to look up IPA symbols))

You're welcome, bwahahah!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You must be fun at parties.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Another similar thing is the definition of ripe.

A fruit can be ripe for consumption (culinary ripeness), and it can be ripe for seed-bearing (botanical ripeness). You can see the difference with cucumbers, which are ripe for eating when they are green and the seeds are barely developed, while they are close to inedible when ripe for seed-bearing. Then they will turn yellow, the pulp shrinks down and becomes slimy and the seeds become big and hard.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The controversy isn't about what they are, it's about what we call them and which categories we put them in on charts. It's like arguing over silly group names - is it a murder of tomatoes or a flock?

[–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

They’re (mushrooms) also constantly listed on American menus as a “protein” option despite a dire lack of the stuff

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's because Vegetable is not a Botanical Term. It is a culinary term. So, Tomatoes are both fruit and vegetable.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This.

All fruits are vegetables. Not all vegetables are fruit.

The definition of a vegetable is just any edible part of a plant. While a fruit is specifically the seed-bearing ovary of a flowering plant.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago

I don't think you can just use two classification systems in the same sentence. It should probably be illegal or something

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 0 points 3 months ago

I kinda don't think they care

[–] the_artic_one@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fungi only got its own kingdom in 1969, before that they were a phylum in Plantae. There are tons of people still around who learned "mushrooms are plants" in school, so it's not surprising downstream vocabulary hasn't caught up.

[–] Unbecredible@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Idk that food vernacular is necessarily downstream of rigorous taxonomies at all lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mushrooms are obviously fruit

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mushrooms deserve their own kingdom

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, fungi fruit. Mycelium is fungi vegeble

[–] jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but a mushroom's such a fungi to be with.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He's such a fun guy that there's not mushroom to party.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

anybody know any other mushroom puns i want free upvotes

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

This is neither shitposti nor shiitake

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

Let's not forget that apples, strawberries and cashews are pseudofruits, just like the produce of my labor!

load more comments
view more: next ›