this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
169 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

72774 readers
1893 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/22560365

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Y'all remember that #DeathTo Black Mirror episode?

We all do, yes

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The power source is about 30 times heavier than the bee can carry. Here's for hoping that they absolutely never are able to make this project work.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What? You don’t want bad actors hacking the bees and sending them inside your ears to cause fatal internal damage? Why are you against progress?!

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Will happen anyway, so rather embrace it as early as possible so that we would be those bad actors and not the sucker good actors on the receiving end.

[–] levzzz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way that a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyways. Because bees don't care what humans think is impossible.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 18 hours ago

Unfortunately, even though it sounds adorable, that's a myth. There's nothing about bees or bumblebees that would make their flight theoretically problematic.

[–] gointhefridge@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago

Well that’s awful.

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The researchers are hoping that the tiny cyborg could allow the military to infiltrate hard-to-access space or be used in search and rescue missions to find survivors in natural disasters, according to a research paper.

In other words the researchers are clawing at reasons to justify their research. The Chinese military aren't looking into this, following commands 9 out of 10 times isn't reliable enough to even start development.

This is about as strategically useful as a bluetooh controlled robo-roach.

[–] svtdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

If you scale it up you can probably send more than one right? Send ten and nine work. That's not nothing.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Womble@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would you bother mind controlling bees in order to make them do the thing they would be doing anyway?

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

Would be cool if you could control the little bee to do a dance that makes the whole hive swarm to a very specific place.

No, only war

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not-so-fun fact: Surveillance drones, that we know of, go back as far as the Vietnam War.

The first UAV attacks date back to the middle of the 1800's.

[–] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The first UAV in the 1800s were incendiary balloons, Austrian attack on Venice.

A. M. Low was a pioneer in rocket guidance systems, planes, etc. In 1917 the "flying bomb" (a controlled airplane) was developed, and later developed into the Kettering Bug - a bomb with wings - which had a terrible success rate and never got used in combat. You can see a reproduction in Dayton, Ohio, at the museum for the Air Force.

Target drones (training drones for military pilots) were made by Radioplane and sold to the Army in the 1940s. That led to the SD-2 Overseer in the 1950s.

Which led to the Lightning Bug, based on target drone designs, used to monitor the Chinese, then Vietnam. They would deploy a parachute so they could be picked up mid-air so they wouldn't fall into foreign hands. China shot down a few of them and set the shot them down and set those drones up for public display.

Drones have a much longer history than you'd think!

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Soviet surveillance drones, which Ukraine has used a few times as suicide drones, were not much more complex than a radiola. Had a flight program in the form of perforated tin disc, if I remember correctly, and an electro-mechanical system of following those instructions (not a computer). They'd be just sent on preprogrammed routes, make photos, those retrieved and analyzed on return. No radio communications, stealthy enough for their purpose.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)