this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
1248 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

8804 readers
2834 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The thought of running around with a 5 million dollar ring gives me heart palpitations.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

The fact that a ring can be worth more then it would cost to provide financial independence for hunderds of people, is kinda jarring.

I know, I know, pretty rock and metal worth paper value notes.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

So really that ring is pure loss.

No one owned that gem when it was just sitting in the ground. It took millions of years to create.

Some capitalism claimed it when one of his workers mined it. Calculated how much energy and labor it has costs to obtain it.

Then sold it for a massive markup compared to their own costs.

The machines have spend energy to get it (loss)

The workers spend life time and life energy to get it (loss)

Bezos his works spend their life time and energy to make him the money he now loses on this ring. (Loss)

The planet lost one of its rare gems. (Loss)

No lives are going to be saved using that rock, its not going to be used for breakthrough science, its not in a museum where we the people can admire our planet and learn from the its amazing processes. (No profit)

Instead its to decorate a hand so one person can be perceived as having value. Ironic.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago

Do you HAVE to be so unromantic? It obviously proved his NEVER-ENDING LOVE for his wife! Does that count for NOTHING?! /s

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's literally every wedding ring regardless of value

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 22 hours ago

All materials obtained just to turn it into jewellery is loss yes.

Mine is a gold alloy rather then pure and i am very fond of it. I derive pleasure from it everyday while the total loss was significantly less than the one in Bezos marriage.

We also had an engagement ring which has an industrial rock because no way where we going to waste our limited money on a real diamond.

All rings combined costs less than having a birth in a US hospital.

Both rings were still a loss to the planet, just like almost every novelty i own and many things i consume. Staying alive is a destructive action and all humans cause loss. That is normal and ok. What is not ok is not being aware/inconsiderate of it.

We should all strive to create the least amount of loss we are aware off and my older self having grown significantly then when i married would love a ring made from recycled computer metals which now often end up on a landfill.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's enough budget for a whole ass R&D project and team. Can this ring shoot lasers or steer a helicopter or something?

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, but it can checks notes impress other rich people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bernie needs to set up an alt account on Twitter where he pretends to be a Republican but reposts all these same messages.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

The issue is left wing agenda gets de-prioritized (buried) or outright blocked since all social media is owned by billionaires and they want to maintain the current status quo.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

We need to set up an indefatigable bot army to do all that and similar...

Bets on how likely that is? We haven't even shown the ability to start anything simpler, so far...

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I genuinely don't understand how the ass backwards, Nazi right has random ass politicians with bot armies and the tech edge left can't be bothered to actually talk to other people. Bot army should be our bread and butter!

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Honestly? We're so collectively tuned-in and on top of so much of the non-stop fuckery everywhere that we're simply scared witless and sapped into a state of flotsam in the roaring deluge, for starters.

Hard to get a bead on anything in the churn, fellow sentient. 😭

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

I am also weary of Bernie's endless calls to do this or that while not specifying any way of doing it. I certainly don't expect him to do anything more, he's already made a much larger impact than most individuals ever can or will. But that entire tour with AoC kind of felt like only half of a useful thing. We all know it's a problem. We all want to put a stop to it. But nobody knows how, that's what's missing. What do you want us to do, Bernie?!? Vote in the primaries, I guess? Would be nice if the next steps were included in the message to take action. Like an instant macaroni box whose instructions just say "You must make the macaroni!", it feels a bit silly.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (6 children)

I get this feeling when I watch Jon Oliver. Jon's really good at identifying the problem, demonstrating why its a problem, and making you kind of upset about it.

God forbid you ever watched Jon Oliver back to back because you'd go mad with the immediate understanding that you live in bizzaro world.

So, it would be nice if HBO had a second show which was more like myth busters where people championed each of the problems Jon pointed out and left the viewer with a clear understanding what they can do or at the least, what can be done.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

He does try to give a solution. It's just that there is little to nothing the average viewer can do to make it happen. Sadly, that is just the way it is. Same with Bernie. We actually can't make the solutions happen. But both are raising public awareness, which "can" impact policy. So I guess watching and listening is what we can do.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

...and if nothing else, documenting what is being done, if it will ever come to a point where it can be turned around.

There's a reason the Nazis paved over and planted fucking trees on as many concentration camps they possibly could before they got overrun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I do think that "the system" (not any particular person or group of people, but the more abstract social meta-organism) is evolved, all systems are, to integrate and channel possible destabilizing forces into neutralized or even system-reaffirming forces. The system does not "platform" people who would legitimately threaten the system as a general rule. Jon Oliver is a pressure release valve, if he was to propose solutions that threatened to alter the system too much (systems see significant alterations as akin to death), he would be deplatformed organically. Again, I must stress that it is not an actual person or organization explicitly setting out to do this, like some sort of shady Comedy Central Illuminati. It's just the same as how our body has a bunch of independent organs and cells that all work together without exactly trying to or knowing that they're doing so.

Unfortunately Bernie is largely the same sort of thing. We can be assured of this by the fact that he is influential. Almost without exception, the more influential someone wants to be, the more pro-systemic they must be. In Bernie's case he may not even realize how pro-systemic he is, he likely sees himself as more anti-systemic. But he is anti-systemic in the same way as a white blood cell is anti-systemic - that is, not at all, and only in appearance without inspection of the bigger picture. I suspect this is why he ends up not proposing any clear course of action. His role, although again I think he is unaware of this, is to create the sense that establishment dissent exists and is possible, that change and reform is possible. I say this without taking a stance on whether it is actually possible or not. Both in a system where it is possible and in a system where it is not possible, there would still be a flag bearer for that possibility regardless of its actual existence.

What I mean to say is that the system self-selects for the type of people who acknowledge problems but not the type of people who make proposals to fix them. It wants to appear to be investigating the desires of its constituents while not actually doing so - the system only cares about its constituents in so far as its constituents lead to the system's well-being as a whole. The system does not intrinsically care for its constituents well-being. So while systems do indeed evolve and legitimately investigate ways to improve their own well-being, they will only appear to investigate ways to approve the well-being of their constituents, if they can help it.

All just my impressions of course, I hate talking in an authoritative voice about my ideas, but it's better than prefacing every sentence with "I think", "it seems like", etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MBech@feddit.dk 21 points 16 hours ago

If he said what needs to be done, he'd be imprisoned immediately for inciting violence against the president, and for planning a coup. Until he has troops on his side, he can not tell you what actually has to happen.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Hear hear. When I look at the state of American democracy from outside, what I find really distressing is that it's not just Bernie; no mainstream person or organization with national reach is giving concrete advice and/or instructions on how to depose the oligarchy, so you have people's energy going to angry tweets and meaningless parades.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ryktes@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

We already know what needs to be done, we just aren't allowed to talk about it.

The Tree of Liberty is thirsty.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] saimen@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So he only spends 0,0087 % of his wealth for the wedding? Sounds pathetic. Most normal people even go in debt for it.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I like this comment even though I can’t actually confirm it’s sarcasm. I think it’s be great if we all spent 0,0087% of our wealth on engagement rings.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

I could afford the finest plastic ring in all of Poundland. It's a shame the founders didn't opt to name their venture Poundtown, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

That chick should be mad. 3-months salary for him would be like $27 billion.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 18 points 19 hours ago

That's a DeBeers diamond cartel propaganda rule of thumb.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 9 points 20 hours ago

He should've used antimatter as a ring

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

If you assume 7% annual rate of return on that $230 billion, then 3 months "salary" would be a little over $4 billion.

That being said, as others have pointed out, the "3 months salary" guideline is just propaganda from DeBeers and no one in their right mind should ever spend that type of money on a piece of jewelry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

"Damn, why isn't Bernie ramboing his way through the billionaires on his own??? Doesn't he know that all of us bitching about him are too lazy to do it ourselves???"

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Good thing they implemented even more tax cuts for the rich, coming soon™...

But obviously not too soon, otherwise they can't blame the dems for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

All I ever get asked for by the politicians I vote for (the Democrats) is money.

Maybe I’m subscribed to the wrong things.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

5 million dollar ring for that wife?

Sir Mix Alot would be ashamed. Silicone parts are made for toys

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

I'm sorry 5 million? For a ring? I'd feel insane amounts of guilt wearing a ring that cost that much

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 21 points 20 hours ago

I imagine if these people were capable of feeling guilt, much of their behavior would be different

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I hope we end it with violence.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 12 points 1 day ago

There's very little chance it ends otherwise to be fair. Talking and negotiation didn't work, peaceful protest didn't work.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Newsflash: it already is ending with violence.

We're losing. Handily.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

This is the part so few people understand.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Even if we tax Jeff bezos 30% realistically it won't make any difference because Trump and his cronies will just blow it on an even more ridiculous ICE budget or build more concentration camps or bomb Iran again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Let's vote for....it.

Well this is awkward

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

And when its ended, take ALL the money back that they stole in various inventive ways

load more comments
view more: next ›