this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
240 points (93.2% liked)

News

30730 readers
3411 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 222 points 1 day ago (4 children)

“The Republican Party, as many of us know it, no longer exists,” said one source, who asked not to be named. “We do not recognize ourselves anymore in Trump’s administration. There is a strong movement out there in the party to reclaim the values we were raised on and reclaim the middle ground.”

Translation: "Omg can you believe this leopard is eating my face? Now that I'm personally affected by my own stupidity I want to be friends with Democrats!"

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 144 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

This is a good thing. Don't mock people for realizing their party has abandoned them and acting accordingly.

Better late than never, but we need to support this ideal.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 118 points 1 day ago (4 children)

and reclaim the middle ground.”

Bullshit it's good, it's a farce to make the "middle" somewhere between the right wing Democrats and the ultra right wing unhinged fascists of the Republicans.

None of them are going "Damn we shoulda listened to Sanders."

They've learned fuck-all.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

o asked not to be named. “We do not recognize ourselves anymore in Trump’s administration. There is a strong movement out there in the party to reclaim the values we were raised on and reclaim the middle ground.”

Translation: “Omg can you believe this leopard is eating my face? Now that I’m perso

But getting fucked by 51-49 votes is I think much more difficult to solve than getting fucked by 65-35 votes. When there's 1-2 votes diff, people don't know why they're fucked and what needs to be done to stop it. When it's 65-35, it's much more obvious what is to be done and what campaigns have to do to organize voters.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I dunno man, that still feels like they're saying they basically agree with like 80% of what Republicans want to do in terms of giving tax breaks to the rich and cutting benefits for the poor. It seems like the bridge too far for them has been the actual fascism and tossing out the rule of law. Which is nice, but it means that this other new party will still be enabling some of the worst aspects of the Republicans if they indeed got a split like you are theorizing. That means that 65-35 split will be solidly on the side of "fuck the little guy" even if they won't outright support fascism.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

100%. And I think such a status quo would be much more easy to organize voters against. Picture AOC talking to a crowd and saying how the oligarchs have 2/3 of politicians in the form of those two parties and we need to close the gap by electing more of ours - 15-20 more. Now it's like - the oligarchs are buying politicians. OK, which ones? OK, what do we do, run independents or primary them within the Democratic party? What other shit can the party pull to fuck us over? Could be totally wrong, I'm just thinking here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Brutticus@midwest.social 18 points 1 day ago

Nah fuck that. They did this. This isnt Trump vs Everybody. The camps are already up. they dont get come back feigning ignorance without even apologizing. They just want a pre 2015 status quo.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, hell, if the right wing Dems separate from the progressives and join the less-crazy-than-maga centerish Republicans and they go play in corporate-funded Neverland that hopefully no sane voter would touch with a ten foot pole, a real progressive party might actually become a possibility. It'll isolate the magats and push them back into a hole, we may get a more moderate conservative party that could be open to compromising again, and hopefully a coalition of real progressives can begin putting forward some much needed ideas.

The key will be ensuring that that progressive party is funded well enough to compete with the corporate money that is pumped by the truckload into that new coalition (which will be a feat in itself).

I dunno, just anything to get these fucking fleas out of our politics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] girthero@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They still deserve mockery for taking 9 years to realize it!

And for many other reasons, honestly

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seriously, more party options is a good thing even if some of them suuuck.

This one definitely suuuuucks. Just a little bit less than where we’re at now.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Workers need to, not the politicians that made this happen.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And somehow, just somehow, his bills get passed.

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 20 points 1 day ago

They are concerned, but not concerned enough to risk losing reelection by going on record as being concerned.

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

They said the same thing after Nixon... and after Reagan... and now after Trump. Moderates will eat it up and we will end up worse on the next cycle of debauchery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (5 children)

A real simple fix would be ranked choice voting.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

fix

Which is why it won't happen.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

After Mamdani, they're scared as fuck of ranked choice elections.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They already were. The right has been sneaking bans on ranked choice voting into many red state legislations for many years now.

You may be thinking "how could they convince people to vote against ranked choice voting?!" By piggybacking on xenophobia of course!

Even though that wouldn't have mattered in his case. He would have won the primary without the need for ranked choice.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I live in uber-blue Oregon and the Dem politicians here rallied against it and got it defeated on the 2024 ballot.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Same here in Massachusetts back in 2020.

It's not necessarily a GOP vs Dem issue, it's dominant parties worried that giving voters more choice will weaken their control.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We have it for Portland though! And it's working

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's already been explicitly outlawed in several places.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] londos@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Vote blue no matter who, but also we'll leave the party completely at the slightest hint you want to reduce income inequality and fix the broken social safety net."

Edit: Actually, good, fuck em. Why should the left need to start its own party. We're the Democrats now. Any Democratic official who leaves the party for this should be abandoned forever.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck that. Dem leadership has abandoned the people. The Democratic and Republicans are finished

[–] londos@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Probably true, but it's easier to move into an empty house than build a new one.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The old school dems will team up with the majority of Rs and nothing will change. Anything to keep progressives from taking power.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago

That would turn the Democrats into a progressive party, which would have nation wide positions, proper party infrastructure in every state and some funding systems. Given how few vote for third parties, that would be a huge win for progressives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah, the Obstructionist Party.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not what GOP stands for?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this point, any bumps in the road to unfettered misogynist, bigoted, surveillance christofacist power would be helpful while the left gets a real party together.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 41 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

American politicians form third right-wing party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

This seems like a trap that will enable the MAGAs to win more elections without a majority of votes.....

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, nah, we're good dawgs. The democrat-republican third party would just be what the Dems are now - a right-of-center status quo capitulation party. Fuck every single one of you and your mothers. Have a good day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Even if some unholy combo of the right and the slightly less right us what we wanted, this is literally just plotting for the spoiler effect

load more comments (1 replies)

“We need to get back to our centrist roots. This authoritarianism is hurting profits” said the capitalists en masse

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article doesn't name names and only mentions "centerists." Those can all fuck off and make their own party. It will split the republican votes the most.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Republicans is more cultish then democrats. Democrats politician would be more open to a third party

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It'll be hard for Democrats to decide between the existing center-right capitalist status quo party and the new center-right capitalist status quo party. Meanwhile most Republicans just know they love fascism.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The USA is a one party state, except with typical American extravagance, they have ~~two~~ three of them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Should’ve pushed for ranked choice voting when they had the chance.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

But mom says we already have conservative party at home

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wish they were in discussion to overhaul our fptp voting system. Any third party is doomed to fail, by design, until first past the post is in the rear view mirror.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

Oh, great. That's what we want. A third party that's also right-of-center. Yay.

load more comments
view more: next ›