this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
1274 points (99.3% liked)

memes

15915 readers
3060 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 118 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pipe01@programming.dev 74 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Not necessarily. Linux can have files that are r---r---r--- too

[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 days ago (3 children)

sudo chown -R 1000:1000 /* && sudo chmod -R 777 /*

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

alias iownyou='sudo chown -R 1000:1000 /* && sudo chmod -R 777 /*'

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Now I've learned enough to know that I can easily learn what all that apparent gibberish does with the "man" command, but you have no idea how unbelievably unapproachable this makes Linux look to the uninitiated.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 days ago

You don’t have to use the cli. But it’s nice to have the option if you want to.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Create one command "iownyou" that does tbe following: Change the owner of every file on the computer to the default user and make every file readable, writeable, an executable by anyone or anything on the computer. It may not be secure, but on the bright side, you'll never have permission issues again!

[–] Zanathos@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Until you realize you just screwed up whatever services you may be running that require specific permissions on specific files. Certificates specifically come to mind for my environment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

I use:

alias thisfolderismine='sudo chown -R $USER'
alias thisfileismine='sudo chown $USER'
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Then you sudo chmod. Windows I have to do weird shit with the properties context menu. And even that sometimes doesn't work. I run commands in powershell as Administrator. Still doesn't work.

Fuck Windows.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Me, realizing I can't delete Edge because the OS assumes it's installed

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 39 points 4 days ago (4 children)

If you're on windows this means you don't own the file. Go to properties security and take ownership.

The default windows configuration is aimed at old people who will call tech support when they fuck up their PC.

You can take ownership of pretty much the entire filesystem.

Windows is actually hugely customizable people just don't.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 days ago (13 children)

Glad to see another voice of sanity regarding Windows.

If you haven't learned by now, on Lemmy the only valid option for dealing with Windows configuration and basic Windows admin tasks is to yeet Windows and go to Linux.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 10 points 4 days ago

If you haven't learned by now, on Lemmy the only valid option for dealing with Windows configuration and basic Windows admin tasks is to yeet Windows and go to Linux.

Not true. The only valid option to deal with Windows at all is to yeet it and go to Linux.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 35 points 4 days ago
[–] Vari@lemm.ee 32 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Me trying to uninstall edge

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Edge is the best browser for downloading much better browsers lol

[–] amorangi@lemmy.nz 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Edge is literally the first program I use on a fresh install.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You can install firefox via cli like powershell.

winget install Mozilla.Firefox
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

My work laptop had a pop-up from an application that basically said "we couldn't restart last time, so you e got 15 minutes until we reboot your computer" with no way to cancel or prevent the reboot.

Me: the fuck you are

* proceeds to kill the service and process from admin command line*

Get fucked fortinet, I'll reboot when I'm gods damned ready

[–] Szewek@lemm.ee 22 points 4 days ago
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

One time Windows told me I needed admin privileges to edit s file. I had admin privileges.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You needed permission from the SYSTEM or TrustedInstaller account.

Which you can give to yourself if you are admin.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

had a friend that was having problems with his PC and windows kept bitching about he didn't have permissions. he ripped out the harddrive with it still powered on and threw it off his balcony into the lake screaming, "I fucking own you!"

epic moment in my life to witness such an event.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No, but this time the owner knows why it doesn't work. Big difference in IT.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

EZ fix i learnt from hunter2

chmod 777 -R /

sudo ufw allow 22

hunter2 ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 days ago (8 children)

To own something is to control it.

You clearly don't have control, therefore you don't own it, microsoft does. You can fix that by seizing the means of computation and install linux.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Just to have linux be even more ruthless with its permission schemes.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When you switch to an admin account on Windows, there are still files owned by "TrustedInstaller" that you can't touch, and processes owned by "System" that you can't terminate.

Linux doesn't have that. When you switch to root, you can kill any process. You can modify or delete any file.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Sometimes (often?) at your own peril!

To anyone else following, if you're mucking around with "I am Root/Admin. OBEY ME!!" you had better have important data backed up!

I once thought an unlisted BTRFS snapshot was an orphan folder taking up space. No permission? Nonsense! Obey my commands!

Suddenly not even terminal commands worked. ("Command 'cd'/'ls'/whatever not found")

. . . it was the "writable snapshot" currently mounted, and the system was so borked it couldn't rollback, and I needed to completely reinstall.

Fortunately I had things backed up on another drive. Live and learn! But that could have been TRAGIC.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Can't shutdown there is a running program

/Me finger immediately goes to the power switch

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This fuckin line

Childhood me: "Whats he mean by that?"

My parents: "[explains slavery]"

Me: ...

Them: ...

Thanks, Disney!

I still love the soundtrack.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.ca 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

collapsed inline media

"TakeOwnership Registry Hack" PSA. It just werks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Is there a technical reason that Linux apps can't/don't just pop up an authenticator thing asking for more privileges like Windows apps can do? Why does nano just say that the file is unwriteable instead of letting me increase the privileges?

[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Some do. I'm sure it is possible with terminal programs. In KDE, you do get authenticator pop-ups.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I own you!
take ownership & full access of all resources
threat actor exploits a vulnerable application that is (1) running as you to (2) access resources it doesn't need: they commandeer your system

how did that happen?

🤔

[–] benjaminb@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
sudo chown <username> <file>
chmod 700 <file>

Don’t see a problem ;) /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 10 points 4 days ago

Ah ah ah! You didn’t say the magic word!

sudo edit the file!

Ah ah ah! You didn’t say the secret word right after!

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Think about this: let’s say you run a program. Do you want that program to be able to take over the computer and read all your files from now on and send the data to a remote third party?

Probably not.

Permissions were created to stop programs from doing that. By running most software without admin permissions you limit the scope of the damage the software can cause. Software you trust even less should be run with even fewer permissions than a normal user account.

The system is imperfect though. A capability-based system is better. It allows the user to control which specific features of the operating system a running program is allowed to access. For example, a program may request access to location services in order to access your GPS coordinates. You can deny this to prevent the program from tracking you without otherwise preventing the software from running.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When I want to end myself

My Body: Survival_Instincts.exe has activated

You don't even own your body lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Visual representation of the first time I ever saw "owner: nobody"

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"takeown /f c: icacls c:" changed my life. Windows literally has trusted installer listed as owning most of your hard drive on every fresh install, but that is negotiable. at least for the stuff you need.

load more comments
view more: next ›