this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
309 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24145 readers
2899 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Marines deployed to Los Angeles temporarily detained a civilian on Friday, the U.S. military confirmed after being presented with Reuters images, in the first known detention by active-duty troops deployed there by Donald Trump.

The incident took place at the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles where Marines took charge of the mission to protect the building earlier on Friday, in a rare domestic use of U.S. troops after days of protests over immigration raids.

Reuters images showed Marines apprehending the man, restraining his hands with zip ties and then handing him over to civilians from the Department of Homeland Security.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You know I really thought the Marines in this situation would keep their heads and just...not comply. Pretty easy to just sit there and not do anything.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not if you are in the military, they train men to follow orders, usually without question and under stress.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good soldiers follow orders

Good soldiers follow orders

Good soldiers follow orders

[–] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Hey there, I've been trying to reach you about your chip's extended warranty!

[–] kruhmaster@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They literally eat crayons, bro.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m could be wrong, but I think the military has an inside joke that marines are really dumb. Like they are really good soldiers but they are really stupid and would eat a crayon not noticing that it’s not food.

But I’m not in the military, so I could be way off.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I don’t know where the joke originated but some marines now eat crayons for the meme

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

So strange to me. In my personal life by chance, of my veteran friends, the Marines are the smartest by far. But bias bc most of them I know from my nerd high school, and other branches vets from non nerd life.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

It’s really hard to keep your mental acuities about you after eating so many crayons.

That’s why you should join the Air Force

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Anecdotally, service members are majority boot lickers. I'm going to baselessly claim that marines in particular are some of the worst, and that many sign up just for the title and the discount. 0 respect for these traitors.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

They offered them a 64 box of Crayola. You really expect them to ignore that offer?

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And they’ll continue to do so because idiots think peace is the only solution.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If it comes to fighting the Marines; there is no option but peace.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Offer them crayons, they might be hungry.

You are you when you're hungry. Grab a Crayon.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This is something I have done. Reckless abandon with no care about personal hygiene or safety when it comes to Crayola Snack Time.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

War is peace

Peace is war

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the Air Force, or the Space Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

Edit: I just read this.

"Despite its importance, the Posse Comitatus Act has weaknesses and loopholes. One significant concern is the District of Columbia National Guard, which is always under presidential control, potentially allowing the President to use it for law enforcement without invoking the Insurrection Act. Another loophole involves the National Guard operating under Title 32 of the U.S. Code, where they perform federal missions under state command, potentially circumventing the Act's restrictions"

Brilliant addendum /s

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You really need to rewrite all this shit from scratch. 250 years is a good run, but at some point you need to restart to fix shit.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should rewrite everything every hundred years just to keep up with modern technology and development.

But no matter what system, someone somewhere will always find ways to abuse everything

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jefferson wanted it to be every 20 years. Every generation essentially.

Instead we let the chuckle fucks in Congress stay as long as they want, into their 80s, across 4 generation. Determining laws for technologies and both global and local economic situations they have no comprehension of or even a chance at understanding.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know if I want THIS supreme court to do anything else. They've fucked up enough already.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I wasn't talking about the Supreme Court. The people should be holding a constitutional convention.

The right already has a plan to do that, the people should have their own plan to counter it / take it over.

And actually a big part of the issue is the Supreme Court intentionally misinterpreting the letter and spirit of the constitution. The first, second and fourth amendments were fine the way they were, the Supreme Court just chipped away at them until they meant nothing any more.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does the law even matter at this point?

[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago

Depends, are you rich?

[–] muxika@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

I was a Marine MP back in the early 2000s. I can see this happening. A lot of Marines are loyal to a fault, and many MPs who I served with were drooling for action. The Corps is home to a lot of conservative nutjobs, and they wouldn't see a problem with detaining left-leaning protesters.

[–] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Leao, who gained his U.S. citizenship through military service, said he was treated "very fairly."

"They're just doing their job," said Leao, who is of Angolan and Portuguese descent.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

So not just a civilian, but a US military veteran who earned his citizenship via service to the country. I'd argue if they want to try and make different levels, since that's clearly what they're trying to do, that he's more an American citizen than anyone that happened to be born here, especially more than any of the current Administration.

Also, how much you want to bet they're checking every piece of paper in his immigration file to see if a signature or date was missed. Serving earns you citizenship, but it is not automatic. You still have to fill out the paperwork, and that leaves open the possibility of errors. We already have stories of people who have been deported because they don't care about fixing paperwork errors caused by Immigration staff if it gives them an excuse to get rid of someone.

[–] dinren@discuss.online 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

US Marines are enemy combatants.

Edit: .world mods, I am explicitly calling for murder

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (5 children)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can't say it anymore.

A few bad apples spoils the whole bunch.

They are effectively on par with municipal police as far as my respect goes.

Unless the ones that aren't willing to stand up to those who are, then they are just as culpable.

We will find out soon.

[–] dinren@discuss.online -1 points 1 day ago

The ones who refuse to interact with civilians, even if it means a court martial. Sure. But every other one deserves a bullet

I hope these marines are aware that they are traitors to the people, and that they will be remembered in history as the bad guys

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

As a veteran myself of 8 years, this is an absolute fucking disgrace and the use of escalation by using the military on it's own citizens disgusts me. I'll literally never vote for a Republican for the rest of my fucking life. Fuck this entire regime and every single enabler big and small. If you're one supporting this, you need to check your integrity and morality, but most importantly you need to learn basic civics and history because this is NOT how it's supposed to be.

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Of course it's a black man 🤨

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

And so it begins…