this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
467 points (98.5% liked)

politics

24114 readers
3000 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 251 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I would like to point out a subtle piece of "reporting" that is not only inaccurate, but I believe in there in an attempt to "both sides" the issue and appease Trump.

Newsom and Trump officials exchanged barbs all weekend after Trump federalized and deployed the California National Guard in Los Angeles amid violent anti-ICE protests.

The protests, as evidenced by the livestreams of LA, were almost entirely non-violent. Violence shown was almost entirely ICE committing the violence, such as when they intentionally shot rubber bullets at an Australian reporter in order to scare her away from reporting.

Saying the protests were "violent" does nothing more than give Trump justification for sending troops in the first place. This is intentionally misleading reporting that does nothing but give Trump more cover, possibly in an attempt to "both sides" the issue in case Trump's goons come knocking.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 116 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The news sources (even the "leftist" ones) are all owned by billionaires.

The real war is a class war, the minorities are used to make us fight with each other.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago

LBJ said it...

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/lbj-convince-the-lowest-white-man/

He wasn't advocating on it, but commenting on the Republican strategy and all the racist shit he saw down in the South

[–] stardustwager@lemm.ee 42 points 4 days ago (4 children)

There are no major leftist news sources in the United States

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

DemocracyNow! has been pretty good for a long time. Although maybe you wouldn’t call them “major” - but they were on cable TV for at least some time where I live.

Amy Goodman got arrested at the 2008 GOP convention and the Dakota pipeline. Very good bona fides.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Been saying this for forty years...

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

ICE committing the violence, such as when they intentionally shot rubber bullets at an Australian reporter

Wasn't that the LAPD? It was an ACAB moment I believe, not ICE specifically.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, does it matter?

They were there supporting ICE raids , deterring protests, and keeping reporters from doing their job. At this point, they're all one and the same.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

LA PD chief stated that they will not report to ICE and that they will only uphold the law. So at least publicly they took a more neutral position

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

Fuck the police.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I want to preface this by saying that I support the protestors and any measures they deem necessary, but what you are saying does not match up with what I’ve witnessed. A live streamer who goes by @LordHito spent several hours streaming the protests after dark. Dozens of protestors seemed to have homemade smoke grenades, as well as rocks and anything else they could hurl easily. Fires were started and windows were broken.

That said, I think those are all entirely justified. The other option is to sit around while democracy dies, and that is unacceptable. There has no doubt been collateral damage, but so it goes in struggles against the government.

100%, the police have been more violent than the protestors and are the true aggressors, but many of protestors have not been the flower children you seem to imply they are. I won’t go so far as to say most, but definitely more than an insignificant amount.

I wish them the best in their struggle. They fight for all of us.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fair points. I will admit that I didn't look at or for every single livestream that was out there. But of all the livestreams I did view, I either saw absolutely nothing at all, a couple of skirmishes that barely qualified as drunken bar fights, and some minor looting. I did not see a single piece of footage that would justify calling in the national guard, and if there is footage out there of riots of the scale that would justify it, Trump would be touting it all over social media in order to make his case.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

I’m completely with you—the response from the government is unjustified, especially against citizens.

I’m reminded of BLM—some areas were very safe and festive while others were more intense. I’m sure the visual looks very different block to block. I saw other live streamers who encountered no violence—LordHito’s just told a different story, and that was largely because he was intentionally looking for trouble.

That said, hearing him get a donation to play the Star Wars Imperial March loudly while the cops advanced was something I’ll never forget.

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Goebels style propaganda: add a bit of narrative to otherwise true story. Take a look at today's russia it works

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The administration needed protests that weren't peaceful. So they supplied the violence.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 104 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Einstein@sh.itjust.works 92 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Trump should be hanged for treason.

[–] blimthepixie@thebrainbin.org 28 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mussolini was shot. In a comical fashion

[–] MelodiousFunk@startrek.website 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And then hung. Also comically.

One of the few cases where that's the correct form of "hung" regarding the execution of someone

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

I think that would be something I'd watch, and I'm not one for capital punishment or public displays of violence.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

Gaddafi his fat ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 72 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Soooooo, he's willing to throw Elon under the bus, the richest dude in America (maybe world, don't know), and he's willing to go after governors that make him look like a terrible leader. All of these other oligarchs, what makes you think you'll be special and he won't do the same to you? Answer, he will.

[–] Zagam@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This time it's different. He likes me in a way he doesn't like the others. They were all toxic but he knows I'm true. They made him be like that. He knows I won't.

I don't have to fix him because he can fix my country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 62 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The American people are the frogs in the pot of water

The water is getting pretty warm and its about to boil soon and everyone keeps hoping that the water won't get any hotter

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Arresting Newsome is the dumbest move trump could make, so he might do it.

Eleni Kounalakis isnt so.eone I know about, but after a quick Google seems to be a huge improvement over Newsome, and with the election next year she'll drag the Overton window left even before the primary starts to gear up.

And she'd be out to do a lot before the election because she's already declared for it.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So in your prediction of the future Trump arrests the governor of California and then just fucks off while that governor's replacement does what they like? I'm not following the logic.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 60 points 3 days ago (1 children)

13 million people in the LA metro area. Like 100, at most, are being violent. Yes, we need to deploy the marines to control 100 people. This is Trump grabbing power and his personal vendetta against Newsom.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I agree with the spirit of your message, but it is a hell of a lot more than 100 angry people in that mob. In my opinion, there should be thousands more. The only other option is to do absolutely nothing while democracy dies.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes there are more than 100 angry people, but just because you're angry doesn't mean you're violent.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wrote a longer comment further down in this thread—the group of 100 I saw live on @LordHito’s stream was definitely violent—some had what appeared to be homemade smoke bombs, they lit fires, and smashed some windows.

However, I think this response is entirely justified and the police have definitely been more violent than the protestors.

I don’t disagree with anything they’ve done, I just think it is disingenuous to say they were a peaceful mob, even though that is what the news has been mostly showing.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (26 children)

That's not violent that's disorderly like... A protest. It's like you think we simply showed up and told the British we were displeased and dispersed in an orderly fashion when ordered to do so.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 4 days ago

Fuckin’ try it.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

and california should be a seperate fucking country.

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Most states probably should be a separated country, I am just worried about states like Texas who will cause more issues that way. You can still do something like we do in Europe with the EU, or Shengen countries etc

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Taco the chickenshit now suggests, "someone please arrest this man." Why won't you have him arrested dementia Donny? Did you forget why again.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Course he does, he's a moron. You literally cannot say anything of an inflammatory nature without giving him ideas

load more comments
view more: next ›