this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
568 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23968 readers
3049 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 179 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (8 children)

This is the language from the law that would permit the President to mobilize National Guard troops in a state without its Governor's consent.

Edited to add: found the law here, it's small and easy to read: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title10/html/USCODE-2011-title10-subtitleE-partII-chap1211-sec12406.htm

If it is invoked, it says:

Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States

But I parse that "shall" to mean the Governor is forced to comply.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 56 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

How long until he declares Martial Law?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 94 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, this is technically exactly that, albeit in a much more limited scope.

The last time this was invoked was in 1965, during civil rights demonstrations in Alabama. But the Federal Government sent in the troops to protect the demonstrators from their local police.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/march-20/lbj-sends-federal-troops-to-alabama

This time it's the other way around.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Honestly one of the coolest moments in US history.

I feel like the destruction of the image of the United States is in full swing.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

That's true. However, I'm afraid that the current regime is not only working to destroy the image of the United States, but to destroy what remains of democracy.

It seems that Drump and his henchmen will stop at nothing to establish a fascist state. I think the administration's actions as a whole point strongly in that direction.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This is the declaration of Martial Law.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 39 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Would be interesting if there is a way that people on the right actually join the left on this since this is the thing the right armed themselves for

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 56 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The pattern I see is that most on "the right" here will not be able to break out of their disinformation bubble unless it affects them personally. So only the small portion who have seen someone they know ("one of the good ones") harassed by ICE will respond.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

That's true. But I think we're closer than ever to that break. The instinct of people on the left is to always rub a dogs nose in shit after it craps on the carpet. But we all know there's better ways.

If people on the left create some bridges here and create awareness this could shift perspectives. There are lots of people on the right and left who will never be swayed on anything. But there's a lot of people who can be. Especially over this stuff.

It gets harder and harder for trumpets to support him and this could be a bridge to far. So many right wing people's core fear is Government doing this very thing. This might supersede their trump honeymoon

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 27 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

I'd love it if you were right, and this is what breaks Trump's stranglehold on the electorate. but the advantage Trump and his friends have is that they have no shame, and lie with impunity. Those lies are attractive. Even now, I am reading that Trump released a statement saying that the troops are quelling the unrest in LA, while the Mayor says no troops have arrived. Which do you think folks in the Conservative Cinematic Universe believe?

It's hard to break these folks out of their bubble when the side pushing the bubble can lie without consequences. Their opposition has the burden of logical consistency to overcome.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They won't.

All of their rhetoric is bullshit to obscure the fact that they hate brown people, queer people, people who aren't their religion, just anyone they're angry at, really.

It really is that simple.

They'll believe, to some extent, what they are saying, they'll tie themselves up in knots, but ultimately, they'll default to anything that allows them to laugh when people they think they are better than are made to suffer.

The few that manage to resolve the cognitive dissonance and realize they are in fact hateful bigots, and that... that is bad?

At that moment, they are no longer right wing.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

since this is the thing the right armed themselves for

No it isn’t and it never was. That was the excuse they used to cover their gun fetish. They always saw themselves as the shock troops of the authoritarian takeover, and the fact that they are delighted it’s happening is confirmation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 128 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

our national guard and armed forces have a decision to make: us or them. this is your time to reject fascism.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 49 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Many who join lean conservative. Many are trump supporters. Don't forget the numbers that voted for him and continue to support him.

It's not going to be that easy.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 71 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Not really. The military is a lot more diverse than you probably realize. It's a big melting pot. So many stories of rural Americans raised in racist environments joining the military and being exposed to all kinds of people and realizing they grew up kind of fucked up.

Contrary to what the stereotype is. A lot of military people are pretty wise and worldly. Seeing different cultures and having to deal with the fallout of failed states. It's not like they're progressives or even Lefty's. But they're not MAGA or right either.

This is why they've been firing lots of officers as well. If nobody is aware, the trump government has been removing many many senior leadership in the military.

I think the move right now by the left is to build bridges for people on the right who have spent their life fearing this type of action. Need to leave open the possibility that there are people on the right who understand this isn't good. Obviously there's the trump zealots. But I bet there's a group of right wingers whose fear of government over reach supersedes support for Trump. Groups like the heritage foundation will increase not activity to suppress that mentally among them. But I think we'll start seeing them speak up if we listen.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

You might be right, and I hope you are. But I'm also at least partially right too. There are far right conservatives in the military, many of them (even if not the majority, a big enough minority).

The main sentiment of my comment was people like us going about our day to day hoping the military will "do the right thing", effectively disobey orders maybe? Disobey the president? Isn't it ingrained into them to not do that?

Its not going to be that easy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 118 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (9 children)

Microwave dispersal cannons can be blocked by a large poster covered in aluminum foil. Just be sure to attach it to a wood stake.

Sound cannons are loud enough to work through strong ear protection, but sound waves are still air pressure pulses. You can disrupt the flow of the pulse with a solid enough curved shield.

If necessary, storm matchs have their own oxidizer. You can light it and wind won't put it out. Styrofoam and gasoline is sticky. Use that information however you want

Do not use a belt to stop blood flow. Get some proper tournequtes (I don't remember how to spell it). Slide it on, and turn it until the bleed stops. If you think it's too tight, turn it some more.

Edit: most military vehicles are diesel fueled. They are pretty thirsty, so be sure to share water with them. Right in the fuel tank is good enough.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 29 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If you curve the aluminium foil somehow, you can actually refelct it back. They did tests on youtube where they used a flipped riot shield and it work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 16 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Do not use a belt to stop blood flow. Get some proper tournequtes (I don’t remember how to spell it). Slide it on, and turn it until the bleed stops. If you think it’s too tight, turn it some more.

If you're worried about blood loss, there are some online resources for how to do first aid. I think https://www.stopthebleed.org/training/ was recommended last time this came up.

I read you need to be careful with tourniquets, because they're quite painful and if used inappropriately can cause long term damage. Used appropriately they can save a life, but you don't want them to be the first tool you reach for.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 107 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Calling it...Trump declares California to be in rebellion and suspends their votes in the electoral college and congress in the next elections.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 11 hours ago

So much other stuff will happen before then

[–] TwistyLex@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

This doesn't read as just California. It's the whole country.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 88 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

So the trump administration is fully admitting that the insurrection attempting to block the certification of the Presidential election 2021 on Jan 6 was open rebellion?

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 27 points 7 hours ago

They admit no such thing.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” - Frank Wilhoit (not the political scientist who passed away in 2010, a younger one who is alive still).

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I know this is sarcasm but, sadly, they don't. I have talked to a few of them. Some either say it is patriot8c and others said it didn't happen.

You can't win

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 24 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Holly shit. I hadn't seen that last image you posted before. I didn't realize the Jan 6 insurrectionist brought flexcuffs. That is quite disturbing. Who the fuck were they planing to kidnap or take hostage with those flexcuffs?

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago

They were probably associated with the ones that built the gallows outside on the lawn. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jan-6-gallows-construction-new-video/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 58 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 56 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Oh this ia what they want. They are chomping at designating leftists as enemies of the state.

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago

The government in general is crumbling and it's corrupt "leaders" will need to ramp up authoritarianism as the constituents begin to question it's legitimacy.

They'll make use of dissenters by putting them in work camps, easing the need for cheap labor, and allowing the remaining population a chance at hiding from their duty to protect constitutional rights by continuing to provide material comforts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 47 points 8 hours ago

Isn't this the same as saying *the government is working against the will of it's populace"

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 43 points 4 hours ago

Here we go. Buckle up and arm yourselves.

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 40 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Time to make that a reality.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Exactly. No federal aid money? Fine, we won't pay federal taxes. Going to claim we're rebelling? Well, alright then.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.world 37 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Can California please just withhold taxes already and put this country out of its misery?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 36 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Sounds like it's going to be a violent summer. As soon as the first protestor gets injured or killed, this will start to spin out of control.

[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 29 points 12 hours ago

Protesters already have been getting injured to the point of hospitalizations.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

L.A. County Supervisor Janice Hahn said:

"The ICE raids across Los Angeles today are chilling. They aren't targeting violent criminals - they are sweeping up hardworking people in our communities just trying to provide for their families. These agents are armed to the teeth and it is clear their goal is to make people afraid and it's working. I understand that during this morning's raids, SEIU California President David Huerta was injured by federal agents and wrongfully detained. I am calling for his immediate release. This is a democracy. People have a right to peacefully protest, to observe law enforcement activity, and to speak out against injustice."

https://abc7.com/post/multiple-people-detained-ice-homeland-security-agents-conduct-2-separate-investigations-la/16678559/

Service Employees International Union California President David Huerta was injured and detained while documenting an immigration enforcement raid in downtown Los Angeles on Friday.

Huerta, 58, was treated at a hospital and then transferred to the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown L.A.

“What happened to me is not about me; This is about something much bigger,” he said in a statement from the hospital. “This is about how we as a community stand together and resist the injustice that’s happening. Hard-working people, and members of our family and our community, are being treated like criminals. We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice.”

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-06-07/immigration-raids-roil-l-a-what-you-need-to-know

A senior DHS spokesperson sent ABC7 a statement Friday, but did not directly address the investigations at both locations.

The statement said in part, "ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been."

If they have a valid credible fear claim, they will continue in immigration proceedings, but if no valid claim is found, aliens will be subject to a swift deportation."

The SEIU President David Huerta is literally the Union leader for the restaurants targeted by these raids.

"Expedited removal" means no due process. No judge. No justice. ICE rolled in with military vehicles, ~~arrested~~ kidnapped over a hundred people in a single day, and will send them all out of the country as fast as they can without any chance to defend themselves or prove they belong here.

They knew what would happen when they raided a city and rounded up people by the truckload. They knew it would spark protests, and in less than two days of unrest and zero dead anyone they're already sending in thousands of National Guard and talking about deploying the fucking Marines on US soil.

They wanted this violence, and they're making it happen. This won't just be in San Diego. This won't just be protests. There will be blood. Don't let them win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 36 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

ELI5, If Republicans in general don't want federal control, they want de-regulation, then why they are supporting federal control of California?

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 41 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They are only against federal control when it's them who are being controlled. They are fine with it happening to other people. It's how they can claim to be pro freedom out of one side of their mouth and anti-freedom with the other. Laws for thee, none for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 33 points 13 hours ago

Hey national guard members, get the fuck out of the way or get steamrolled. You’re not heroes.

[–] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

So is the red line crossed yet or is the goal post once again some indeterminate point in the future.

History won't tell the beginning of the Trump regime at that indeterminate point. It began when he rode down that piss yellow escalator.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

" In addition, the Secretary of Defense may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion." 100% illegal according to Posse Comitatus Act.

Deploying Marines, Space Force, Navy Army or Airforce in the US against the US is prohibited

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Minor nitpick: national guard soldiers under title 32 is totally fine (the George Floyd protests), however that requires the state governor's approval. Trump bypassed that by putting them on title 10 orders which is active duty. Those are typically only for training or overseas deployment, and not for actual deployment within the US (though I think the south border mission may be an exception).

So, he's already violating the law, but also putting provisions to use active duty soldiers as well which is double against the law.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Right to freedoms of assembly and expression.

They need to chill.

And listen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 24 points 12 hours ago

Well that’s scary holy shit this is definitely a step up on the fascism ladder

[–] Rexiose@lemmy.zip 19 points 13 hours ago

This is the beginning of a nation wide revolution, from the democrats, but the republicans are not sad about it because it push the public away. They forget, or look to California, that Trump is incompetent and they vote him. It would not be the first President, that call demonstrates criminals or revolutionary's and hunt them, to form a autocratic State.......

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 18 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The Confederacy was in a state of rebellion too. He's equated standing up to ICE, which is seemingly similar to when the Bostonians stood up to and were massacred by the British, with the Confederate's bombing of Ft. Sumter.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

I wonder now what my ex-housemate thinks of Trump. He is one of those centrist types who thinks excessive power from one side needs to be counteracted by the other, but mostly pay lip service to the right. He dislikes the right in his country which ruled for 13 years and voted centre left, but supports Trump and right wing parties in Europe because of too much immigration in the West. But at the same time, he supports Palestine. My ex-housemate means well for the most part, but he is one of those men who are vulnerable to disinformation.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›