this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
293 points (98.3% liked)

politics

23928 readers
2411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump on Saturday said there would be “serious consequences” if tech mogul Elon Musk funds Democratic candidates to run against Republicans who vote in favor of the GOP’s sweeping budget bill.

“If he does, he’ll have to pay the consequences for that,” Trump told NBC News in a phone interview, but declined to share what those consequences would be.

“He’ll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,” he added.

Trump also said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk after a feud between the two men erupted into public view earlier this week.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 90 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

I would have a very difficult time voting for someone who received funding from musk.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 38 points 8 hours ago

Any Dem funded by a Nazi won't get my vote for sure.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 24 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I would rather vote for someone who got spite funding by a nazi than to vote for an anti-America, nazi/terrorist. And that's anyone supporting the current regime.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I would too, but I'd rather vote for people willing to tell them both to go fuck themselves

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (9 children)

And this is exactly why Trump won. Twice.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (21 children)

Do you have no principles? Like look what Musk has done. And you want democratic candidates in debt and aligned with him? He’s just going to continue what he started, he’s not going to do an about face.

We should be incriminating millionaires putting money into campaigns, not accepting them

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (10 children)

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good enough.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 hours ago

Don't accept money from Nazis.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

You got a lot of angsty democrats responding here with basically "c'mon bro, please, bro, you don't understand, if we don't take the money to do the Hitler, then the Republicans will do it completely for free, please, bro, be reasonable!"

Fuck that. I'm normally a pretty practical person, but if the dude who's directly financing neo-nazism parties around the world like a one man CIA starts dumping cash into the democrats, it's because he means to turn them into the neo neo Nazis, and they will not be getting my vote. Will the country burn? Yeah, but it's going to do that because the democrats think fundraising is more important than having literally any principles or strong policy positions at all, regardless of whether I vote for them or not.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 4 points 3 hours ago

Exactly. American liberals have lost their fucking minds already sticking up for this guy after what he’s been doing.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Who was it? Ro Khanna I think is already out there on socmed kissing his ass.

Why do they have to suck so goddamn much?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 74 points 9 hours ago

Justice: weaponized

Party support: criminalized

Population: fuck yeah daddy oooh yeah this is ok fuck everyone else

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 45 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Sometimes I think about how if any previous president had done, over the course of their entire career, the things Trump does in the average week, or sometimes even just a single day, it would have immediately ended their career. If a previous president had openly stated that if a specific person funded their rivals there would be serious consequences, that'd be it. They'd be done. Impeached on the spot, out of office, blacklisted by their own party, and shamed for all of history.

The news cycle crucified Obama for wearing a tan suit. They raked him over the coals because he was so out of touch that he asked a burger place if they had Dijon mustard. What do you think they'd have done if he openly promised retribution against those who dared disagree with him like this?

And Donald motherfucking Trump does this crap all the godamn time, and he just gets away with it because the Republicans like that it's their tyrant, the Democrats are afraid of actually doing anything, and by the time the public can mobilize against one thing he's already done three more things that make the past look trivial.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

I don't get it either. And the only thing I've come to conclude is that I should hold those in my life who in any way provided support for Trump or to what led us here accountable. I don't know what that fully means either. Just that they'll be hearing from me that which should be directed at the president or others, but because they won't ever do it themselves they'll get it from me. Kick me out of your life then. On these grounds. They've already made their choices anyway.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

They spent years saying that Obama was going to declare martial law and end elections.

Then, Trump supporters literally stage a coup and there are no consequences. They made Carter give up his peanut farm, but Trump can keep all of his shady illegal businesses?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 40 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

When is one of these fucking dipshits going to have the other killed?

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

My fantasy is that Trump tries to have Elon killed/arrested but fails because he's rich and has very good guards. So then Elon sends someone to kill Trump, which is successful. Then Elon dies from some drug complications right after. If we're lucky, they both die after shitting their pants.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 11 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

In this scenario, I would like Thiel, Yarvin, Marjorly, and the rest of the fascist gang to die in a freak aeroplane crash.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Bit of a FYI:

We all shit our pants when we die. The sphincter muscles relax and well, shit happens.

We also fart...a lot.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But they said AFTER shitting their pants, so really we’re just hoping two drug-addled fuckheads very reasonably shit themselves before dying so there’s insult added to injury.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 4 hours ago

Ah yes. Missed that part. Double shit for them both!

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I have discovered bodies in various stages of post mortem, from recent to rigor. Shitting of pants is not a given. And I was an EMT, not just a crazy person.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Years ago, I read In Cold Blood, and the thing that scared one of the killers the most, was that when he was hanged, he'd shit his pants. He insisted on using the toilet before his execution.

Not me. If they're going to execute me, I'm going to hold it for a few days, and make my executioner's deal with the ahftermath.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Can they shit their pants very publicly and in the most embarrassing way possible?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 35 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Democracy? Never heard of it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 34 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Also, golly gee thank god we avoided BidenSoOld/"GenocideJoe" and Kamala the Cop, because they would have been Just As Bad (TM).

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 12 points 3 hours ago (11 children)

Trans people, immigrants, etc fearing for their lives, being kidnapped to a foreign death camp, and going full conservationist on climate change is a lot bigger of a difference than 1.3%.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I would still be in the US if Kamala had won. I'm trans, latina, and in a w4w relationship. But in retrospect, I'm so glad I left

I'm still fucking tired of being treated as a political pawn by so called "leftists" who don't actually give a shit about intersectionality

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's insane that we've reached a point in the normalization of open corruption that he can now say something like that and not be immediately impeached by overwhelming majority of both parties. Even 6 years ago this alone would have never been seen as acceptable.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 16 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The consequences will be we have a Nazi party and a White Supremacist Apartheid party.

This isn't a threat. It's saying the quiet part out loud.

Money controls both parties. Elon Musk is just rich enough that if something slightly goes against his wishes he can fund something to support his wishes.

We're in a super fucked up cyberpunk dystopia where the richest fight for the worst outcome

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Nationalize his businesses that'll teach him

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 31 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Amen, fellow MAGA! Let's also block his ability to fund the Dems with a campaign finance reform amendment! Then, when we really have Musk on the ropes, we'll hit him with a one-two punch, overturning citizens united and codifying the fairness doctrine into law. If he thinks he can steal the next election, he's got another thing coming! We'll slam him by replacing the electoral college with a ranked choice voting (or other better) system! He'll never know what hit him!

[Me, to myself]: "God, I hope this works."

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's actually a pretty solid way to pose those ideas to a MAGA person

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Just waiting for the "Lock him up. Lock him up." chants. They have always been at war with Eastasia.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago

Deport
His
Ass

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

“If he does, he’ll have to pay the consequences for that,” Trump told NBC News in a phone interview, but declined to share what those consequences would be.

I wonder how many times his attorneys have explained to him the concept of incriminating yourself in advance of retaliation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bonus@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Even Epstein’s lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It’s old news.

Might not be the persuasive endorsement he thinks it is.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 5 points 6 hours ago

What a vague threat

[–] Null_Ritual@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

When did consequences become a part of Trump’s agenda?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

He's all about that, but consequences for others. That's why he told all his dipshit supporters he is their "retribution".

Retribution for what, who the fuck knows.

They are angry about a lot of things, most of them made up horse manure from Bullshit Mountain, aka, the Faux News Cinematic Universe. But they expect donvict to dole out consequences to people who are not them. The dog whistle that is not all that much of a dog whistle is that the people who need to be hurt are mouthy women, LGBTQ, POC, liberals, people with an education, experts they don't like, etc...

load more comments
view more: next ›