this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
109 points (94.3% liked)

politics

23928 readers
2946 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

China has not significantly eased restrictions on rare earths exports, contrary to Washington’s expectations.

This is what it's about. Trump got outplayed like the dunce he is and thought he could rollback and pretend nothing happened. Unfortunately take-backsies are not as easy in geopolitics.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Trump needs to realize that China is not one of his show apprentices who kiss his ass in order not to get fired.

Now he is the apprentice, depending on vital trade from China. And once Trump has ruined his farmer base and wrecked the US economy, he will be even more dependent on foreign goods.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

TACO….TACO man. He’s got to be a TACO man.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

He just whines first, in an attempt to place the negative optics on the other party, when in reality the 'master negotiator' is asking for unrealistic concessions. It's a known strategy. Remember his Ukraine comments?

Oh, and anyone arguing with me is obviously a genocide supporting trump supporter making things difficult for me to continue my good work.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like Xi is dining on orange chicken tacos tonight.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What would you expect on Orange Chicken Tacos? Lettuce and Tomato? Orange chicken is usually served with rice in the US, so rice yes/no? I am getting hungry.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I would add cabbage and crunchy noodles, and some chinese peppers if you're feeling spicy.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks to your comment, today's sober me is going to stop at the grocery store after work and do this weekend's high me SUCH a huge solid! 😘

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Way to pay it forward.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not big on cabbage myself but that makes sense. Going to have to think about some more.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe kimchi? That sounds pretty fire as a topping for orange chicken tacos

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I have not tried kimchi, but it sounds better to me than just plain cabbage. Would definitely be interesting.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Everything is so fucking quick and easy for this guy but every fucking time it's time to put up or shut up things get "extremely difficult". Everyone else knew that from the start...I'm sick of waiting around for this guy to catch up to basic levels of understanding like "Putin doesn't actually want peace" and "tariffs don't actually fix inflation" and "trade wars are a bit difficult to manage and you have less leverage when you start one against the entire world (including close allies) at the same time even though China was already a handful the last time we went through this with just them"

I have more faith in my local high school debate club than these absolute clowns.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 18 points 2 days ago

Why impetus does any country have to make a 'deal' with a guy who's literally shredded the deals he previously made less than a decade ago?

He's also old as fuck. He's going to die soon, so why would anyone want a deal right now?

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

TACO on Russia, Ukraine and EU will fight it by themselves. TACO on Zionist , Gazan and good people around world will fight back. TACO on China, everyone is cheering.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Why would they make a new trade deal when we are technically still under one? We just renegade on that deal and now want to create a new one? China won this trade war before Trump even was back in office

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So trump is telling us he himself "doesn't have the cards" then? trump tells us what happens when you don't have the cards:

"He's asking for more, just more and more and more. And he doesn't have the cards. He doesn't have the cards, so hopefully he's going to get it done," Trump said. source

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ironic using the cards analogy when all his casinos went bankrupt. Would love to play poker with this asshole and take all his money.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Best he can do is a fake check. But continuous losses right in his face would make wonders to his blood pressure.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago

Try this sometime: handcuff yourself to a tree in the park. Complain to anyone walking by that they put you in these cuffs and they need to let you out. If they don't listen, yell louder that you're being ganged up on.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

The Art of the TACO

Master dealmaker at work here... Fucking orange clown

Trump's idea of negotiating:

Xi: what's in it for us?

Trump: nothing

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Billy Hunt.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Out-maneuvered Felon TACO: "Who knew ...?"

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

tRaDe WaRs aRe EaSy tO WiN!

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 days ago

Maybe if he's held on to his cards instead of burning them all, it wouldn't be so hard,, 🌮?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

TACO gonna TACO.