this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16651 readers
69 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago

Near the British Empire then.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (25 children)

Mark here either has poor reading comprehension, or is intentionally being a little shit by cherry picking part of the title and not reading the whole thing.

collapsed inline media

The location specified is not 'north of Antarctica'.

It is, 'the Weddell Sea, north of Antarctica.'

Giving 'the Weddell Sea' as the location is actually decently specific, and the 'north of Antarctica' that follows is modifying / adding to the description of 'the Weddell Sea'... not the entirety of the location description.

I would snarkily, rhetorically, ask if people are even taught how to diagram out a sentence structure anymore, but I already know the answer is 'not really, no', because the average adult American literacy level is that of a 6th grader.

Mark, and anyone else who also finds this to be a funny, poignant zinger, need to go back to middle school and relearn grammar.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yup, by naming Wedell, they located it quite well; there are 13 small named seas completely encircling Antarctica. By naming any of them, you can reasonably locate (to any point that matters to dear reader) the wreck

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While you're not wrong, you're also massively over-analyzing and "WELL AKSHULLY"ing what appears to be a silly one-liner, not a serious attempted dunk on the article.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I am not going to apologize for having humor standards above that of a middle schooler.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I would snarkily, rhetorically, ask if people are even taught how to diagram out a sentence structure anymore, but I already know the answer is ‘not really, no’, because the average adult American literacy level is that of a 6th grader.

I agree with your overall statement. Just wanted to point out that there are a lot more people than Americans out there.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

It is still valid to point out that "north of Antartica" is a silly phrase in context, even though it's fine given the more specific Weddell Sea information. If you did want to help readers know the story based on a more well-known landmark, a less silly phrase would have been simply been "Weddell Sea, near Antarctica".

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong, you're just insufferable.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nah, spectral IS wrong. The "complaint" isn't arguing grammar, it's explicitly pointing out that there's a very unhelpful couple of words in the sentence.

The sentence "I live north of Antarctica." gives you basically zero information but is perfectly grammatically correct.

The line may as well have been "The weddel sea, which is made of water,..."

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nope. You could as well say: Mediterranean Sea, north of Antarctica.

I have two dollars, less than infinity.

The temperature is pleasant, higher than absolute zero.

Doesn't add anything. There are no seas south of Antarctica.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It adds something, it specifies the nearest location, if we assume the basic sanity of the sentence. Mediterranean Sea, north of Antarctica would be insane thing to say. Mediterranean Sea, north of Africa however is a proper signifier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The map he linked literally shows the Ross sea south of Antarctica.

Also since its earth is spherical and its near the south pole you can really go any direction and find a sea... that just becomes a matter of perspective.

In this case, specifically, the wedell sea is to the north of the continent

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago

Tthat's not south of Antarctica though. It's below, in terms of the map's perspective, but "absolute south" is the middle of the picture. Anywhere outside Antarctica is north of Antarctica.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let me guess, you think earth is flat cause maps are flat.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tell me you didnt read my comment without telling me

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

I did. Doesnt mean you made any sense. Any direction from Antarctica is north no matter what perspective.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Weddell sea is good, mentioning Antarctica is good, the word “North” is meaningless in this context which is what the OP is laughing about.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

It should probably say, "off the Antarctic coast", or even "X kilometers off the Antarctic coast".

[–] SloganLessons@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Or - bear with me here - it’s just a funny detail and people are laughing about it. Because any sea is obviously going to be north of it

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Just looking at that map seems to show the Ross sea to the south

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sir do you know how globes work?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ardrak@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Probably the author made this exact mistake

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago

Nothing is more South than the south pole. Everything is north of it. The map is looking directly at the "bottom" of the earth.

[–] p3n@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

The Weddell Sea, north of Antarctica, brought to you by the department of redundancy department.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah that popped out to me immediately. I looked up the Weddell Sea and as your shared map shows, it's a big but well identified area. It's not like they said it's in the Pacific Ocean or some shit.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago

Expedition 22 got some sweet tech

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can construct a weird true statement from this: All continents besides Antarctica are located North of the South-Pole.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Technically, almost all of Antarctica is located north of the south pole

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I can specify: south of the arctic.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Here I’ll help, it’s also south of the North Pole.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›