this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
265 points (99.3% liked)

News

30170 readers
3915 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine said on Tuesday that it had hit the bridge connecting Russia and the occupied Crimean Peninsula with explosives planted underwater, in its third attack on the vital supply line for Moscow’s forces since the full-scale war began in 2022.

Ukraine’s security service, the SBU, said on Telegram that its agents had mined the piers of the road and rail Crimean Bridge, also called the Kerch Bridge, and detonated the first explosive at 4.44 a.m. Tuesday. The whole operation took several months, it added.

The agency said it had used 1,100 kilograms of explosives which “severely damaged” the underwater pillars supporting the bridge.

Russian officials did not immediately respond to Ukraine’s claims. Traffic on the bridge has been temporarily suspended, the bridge operator announced on its official Telegram account.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks like Zelensky actually has all the cards

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Ukraine removing a significant portion of the Russian nuclear threat? trump didn't even say 'thank you'.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 week ago

God damn Ukrain is going hard this week

And good for them, these "peace talks" are a farce and the fact Trump's position is that he'll stop helping Ukraine if Russia keeps attacking is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zelensky suddenly throwing all the cards he was holding on the table.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

I’m cautiously optimistic that this isn’t all his cards.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bet you could've stopped that if you had some highly trained guard dolphins posted up around the area.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Russia could have stopped it if they agreed to a cease fire

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Just leave Crimea and the rest of occupied Ukraine and focus on making your own country stable and strong.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I see Red Alert 2 reference.

I smile.

I upvote.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only ways to have peace with a tyrant that denies your right to exist, are to surrender, or to soundly and overwhelmingly beat them. Anything else is just going to prolong the conflict and the suffering.

We did this with Nazi Germany, then we did it with Imperial Japan too, if we have to do it again with Soviet Russia it's only because we didn't do it thoroughly enough in 1991, because we keep trying to imagine there's a nicer, easier, smarter, gentler way to do it using economics and politics maneuvering, by being patient and subtle and sneaky. There isn't, it just delays the inevitable conflict while giving your enemies more time to prepare. Regimes like Putin's do not acknowledge anything other than force, and anything less than force is a weakness to take advantage of, which they inevitably do.

We need to stop acting like oppression, despotism and dictatorship are valid ideologies and forms of government. They are not. We cannot tolerate them because they are simply intolerable. They are a violation of basic, fundamental human rights, they are not merely an "alternative to democracy" or "countries going their own way". We must fight them not because we are trying to be the "world police", nor because we alone are responsible for making the world a better place. We must fight them because it is absolutely required for self-preservation, because they deny and make a mockery of the very existence of the human rights and dignity that we consider non-negotiable, including our own. We are obligated to fight them not because of treaties and organizations like the UN or some international laws, those are all things we developed to codify the fact that we are obligated to fight them because it is in our own self interest and our own survival depends on it. Making the world a better place for everyone in the end is just a side benefit.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

And soon we will have to do it to America

[–] Blade9732@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can we please crowdfund about 4 tomahawks to just finish this stupid bridge. I get why we haven't sent them, to expensive, proprietary tech, US preventing deep strikes and escalation. But for the love of God, four or so of some older ones can't hurt us, and I just want to see Russian media coverage try to explain how it's not a problem and nothing to see here. Plus, Russians in Crimea will absolutely shit if the whole thing blows up.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given the recent announcements that countries like Germany have given Ukraine the ok to use their long range weapons against targets inside Russia I think it’s just a matter of time before we see this happen.

Frankly I was wondering why the bridge wasn’t attacked very quickly after that announcement was made. But with this report of the underwater sabotage I think it now makes sense. This underwater explosion likely took a long time to plan and carry out, and Ukraine probably wanted to see the results of it before launching any long range strikes on the bridge.

If there are other underwater explosives that have already been planted then I’d expect to see them detonated as well. After that then Ukraine might very well launch long range missiles to target the section(s) of the bridge that have now been weakened.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly I was surprised it wasn't pre-wired with explosives or some way to ensure rapid disassembly in case of invasion.

Seems like a no-brainer, but I'm sure that would be prohibitively expensive due to shelf life and stability of explosives, and maintainence for any mechanically coupled systems.

Hindsight is usually 20/20

[–] hybridep@lemmy.wtf 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because the bridge was built by Russia after its annexation of Crimea in 2014.

Russia built the bridge after it invaded Crimea in 2014 by the way

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

I’m really liking this Ukrainian summer blockbuster. 🍿

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

No cigar unfortunately. Bridge was reopened immediately after.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

If this is not added leverage against Russia on the negotiations in Istanbul, the Ukrainians might be up to something again. It is their MO to wreck the Russian rear before conducting an offensive.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Its funny as I think this bridge has been damaged before. I bet bridges in moscow are not getting proper maintenance but they will work on this one. Money for war but not for public infrastucture.