this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
809 points (97.9% liked)

memes

14869 readers
5892 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
809
Personally I prefer SI units (sub.wetshaving.social)
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by weird@sub.wetshaving.social to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 33 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

I think shitting on Americans for every little thing they handle differently is moronic but I will say I won't ever order food that's advertised as "footlong". That's just needlessly gross. I don't like to imagine the cashier lining up a sandwich with their bare sole for quality control but that's the kinda mental image the term conjures up.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 34 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Wait to you find out how they measure the 6 inch ones.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Well that explains the shrinkflation

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

When you're in the pool, there's shrinkage!

[–] bitMasque@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Do women know about shrinkage?

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 9 points 9 hours ago

It's Footlong® not foot-long. Not to be confused with an actual measurement or size guarantee.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How about a sandwich shop where you can order a Big Italian?

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 5 points 11 hours ago

Well if it's a sandwich shop you'd really need two Italians, even big ones.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Footlong sandwiches have nothing to do with the body part "foot".

They hardly have anything to do with the measurement "foot" since they are like 10.5 inches (~26cm) now or something (as opposed to the 30ish centimeters that make a foot).

This is part of the enshittificaton of Subway.

Their cookies are still dope tho.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

I'm like 60% sure during the height of subway in mid-2000s-early 2010s the subway commercials actually did advertise the foot long as being 12 inch sub's for 5$ (goddamn the 5$ foot long ads were catchy). However unlike real measurements that have defined standards, as subway enshitified they weren't forced to change naming as they slowly shrank the sandwiches. Of course this is long enough ago that an entire generation doesnt know who Jared was so its okay to assume it was never a real foot long.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 points 3 hours ago

Some shit doesn’t make sense though which seem to be done for no discernible reason, like how keys have to be inserted upside down and move away from the door to lock it, or how fridge doors open from the other side, or how morons are elected to become the president

[–] halvar@lemm.ee 22 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

As someone who isn't into feet, I've always just assumed it's because uncovered feet are vaugely intimate. As in feet are mostly covered by shoes but when you get to see them uncovered it might just mean the situation has gotten intimate. I mean that's basically the idea behind any societal view which dictates that women should cover any particular part of their body, it's not that muslim people inherently find hair sexy, it's the societal norms which attached an intimate meaning to hair.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

I have to agree with this one. I acknowledge that feet are indeed connected to genitalia via nerves, but I highly, highly doubt that's the reason that viewing a woman's bare feet makes some men horny. I don't think the foot fetish is about her and/or her nerves or pleasure at all. It's a simple matter of getting to see an often delicate looking body part that is usually concealed, and being allowed to interact with them in a sexual way. I'm more of a butt/thighs/hips guy, myself.

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

I agree with you both; it's the most logical explanation. See also: cultures that don't revere womens' breasts (likely) since they're never covered.

Also

I'm more of a butt/thighs/hips guy, myself.

collapsed inline media

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

There are so many unique things that arouse people. You know that rule that there's a fetish for everything. I strongly suspect it's a human wiring issue, some related evolutionary advantage that manifests as having things for feet, or hair colors, or freckles or untold less socially acceptable things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dufkm@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

I've always just assumed it's because uncovered feet are vaugely intimate

Especially when they're in my mouth

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I've yet to meet a woman who wasn't into a good foot-rub. It's my go-to opening move for the Netflix-and-Chill date and rarely fails to end in us at least making out. I never really got "foot-fetish" as a guy thing. It struck me more as a girl thing, with women using "rub my feet" as an excuse to initiate intimacy. And some guys just decided if a woman was showing any amount of feet, she must be coming on to him.

I mean that’s basically the idea behind any societal view which dictates that women should cover any particular part of their body, it’s not that muslim people inherently find hair sexy, it’s the societal norms which attached an intimate meaning to hair.

I think the issue isn't the presentation of hair, but of femininity. And the more extreme interpretations of this (hardly unique to Islam - Puritanical Christians, orthodox Jews, and other more fanatical patriarchal faiths also demand women hide themselves) are about disguising any aspect of a person that might lead to a man being aroused. Eventually, you're just shoving women into an entirely separate room, because the presumption is that men have zero self-control in any social setting.

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

so when you go to the beach or pool with friends it's intimate?

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (4 children)

yes lol. have you seen a bikini? that's explicitly intimate and provocative. it's the most naked you're allowed to be in public without people calling you out.

beaches are often considered inherently sexual places. like "Beach episode" is synonymous with fan service.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Like the beach scene in saving private Ryan

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

i mean... we saw parts of them that we don't normally. there's even a taboo around seeing those parts. taboo is the heart of many fetishes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Or Top Gun.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

don't forget the shame. the wrongness of it is very much part of it. like, most people think feet are kind of gross, so it feels taboo to like them. taboo is one of the strongest things in fetishes. "this is so wrong/dirty" is a powerful thought for the horny mind.

honestly, if/when society becomes more accepting of foot fetishes i bet that will actually decrease the number of people that have one. if society stops shaming them it likely won't get them off the same way.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 30 minutes ago

Ehat about people who like feet naturally? I'd much prefer it wasnt strange to think feet are attractive.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

many people wonder that, why are feet so desired? sure, there are people that are into every crevice of the body, but feet seem to be winning the popularity race by a lot? hell, even otherwise vanilla people like them sometimes

the answer issss... (probably) that our spaghetti wiring of the nerves is to blame. you see the nerves responsible for feet connect to the spinal cord riiiight next to where our genitals connect as well. so sometimes the more intense signals tickle the unintended paths next to their intended one. some people when they orgasm (myself included) can feel a wave of electricity running down into their feet, even making one or multiple of their toes curl.

collapsed inline mediapicture of a diagram of the spinal cord, the relevant nerves being Lumbar nerves (Lx) and Sacral nerves (Sx)

Lumbar spine L1 – the first lumbar nerve is responsible for sensations around the groin and genitals, and has a role in motor control of the hips. L2, L3, L4 convey sensation for the front and inside of the thighs, and extend to the inner aspect of the lower legs. L5 nerve region covers the outside of the thighs extending into the outer aspect of the top of the lower legs.

Sacral Spine S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 nerves provide some nerve supply to the genitals, as well as the anus, sacrum, buttocks and the backs of the thighs. The pudendal nerve is the nerve bundle comprising nerves from S2-S4 and which is the primary nerve of the perineal area.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That explains it from a having your feet played with side, but not really from the finding feet hot side.

[–] vodka@lemm.ee 5 points 10 hours ago

One causes the other

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Making other people feel good feels good.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

I think the more important overlap is in the brain itself. We have known that regions of cortex that register genital stimulation are adjacent to/overlap with the area hat registers foot stimulation since Penfield did the first mapping of cortex in the 1930s.

In answer to "that's true for perception, but why the excitement for looking" lays in that the homuncular representation is not a simple one. We know that there are multiple homuncululi tied to different types of perception, and there is more modern work that ties the planning and goal systems to the functional centres around key points of the homonculi. The physical closeness of the two is possibly responsible for the mingling of the two representations. Back in the day there was even a mechanism for it - "ephaptic excitation" - where axons running in a bundle could activate neighbouring fibres through changing the ionic composition of the fluid around them.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I avoided the Wikipedia entry because all of the the examples censor the genitalia. It's such a strange decision but the inclusion is necessary for this discussion.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I don't really see a difference. They list the genitals next to toes and feet. The wiki at least describes the concept more simplistically, which I think is the most important aspect.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

sounds like it's a double whammy then! really no wonder feet are so popular

[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

it's also just a reaction to sexually transmitted epidemics, interestingly enough.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9819924/

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

right!! I came across this article at some point a year or two back, and it's kinda lived rent free in my head since then lmao

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

it kinda sounds like- our genetrics tell us "right so let's dial back on normal fucking but uhhh ah! yes fuck some feet idk"

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 21 points 10 hours ago

Nothing more European than a metrosexual

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Heck, the US can't even standardize on meters. We have volt meters, amp meters, flow meters, sound meters...

[I'll show myself out]

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I appreciate them for making walking easier

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 hours ago

I appreciate them for making kicking nazis easier

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

miss the old days

[–] KiESi@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What's with the black lines, making it look like Thern, iPhcne?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

they probably fucked up while trying to censor the actual part they wanted to censor

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago

You can suck toes like you can cocks or boobies or whatever it is you like to suck. Humans just like sucking things. Also, they're cute.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

Metres measure absolute distance, but feet measure how distance feels. One foot is a short distance, and a hundred foot is s long distance.

load more comments
view more: next ›