this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
141 points (98.6% liked)

politics

23480 readers
2808 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 35 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

A two-hour "interview" is more an intimidation tactic than an "interview":

Piker, recounting the incident on his Twitch live stream on Monday, said he was led to a private room at Chicago O’Hare airport and interviewed for nearly two hours about his political views.

“The goal here is to put fear into people’s hearts, to have a chilling effect on speech that, like, the government is unafraid of intimidating you,” Piker said. “Does this stop me from saying whatever the fuck I want to say? Of course not. Don’t be ridiculous. But the reason why I wanted to talk about it was to give you more insight into what the government is doing, and to speak out against this sort of stuff.”

His responses were brilliant - and I'm taking note:

Piker repeatedly described the exchange as “cordial” but said he was transparent with the officer interviewing him that he planned to speak out about his experience, which the streamer said felt anything but random and “routine”.

Assuming the officer was familiar with his online commentary, Piker said he was candid about his views, telling the agent he was “not fond” of the US president.

He said the officer was particularly focused on his criticism of Israel’s prosecution of the Gaza war, asking him: “Do you like Hamas? Like, do you support Hamas? Do you think Hamas is a resistance group?”

In response, Piker said he told the officer that he was a “pacifist” and wanted “the endless bloodshed to end”.

“I just kept repeating that over and over again,” he said, describing the line of questioning as “insane” and a violation of his first amendment rights.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

His responses were brilliant - and I'm taking note

No. Never talk to police.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

There is no police and right to a legal defense anymore in the US. Just goons.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not true. Don’t comply in advance.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I didnt meant to say that you should give them anything, just that you shouldnt expect to be granted the rights you might expect. They will absolutely just put you in a cell for days, weeks, months if you dont answer their questions. People should be prepared for that.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 15 hours ago

Don’t expect it, demand it. Dissidents like Rumeya Ozturk have been freed after pursuing justice in the courts. What you say could happen but then it will be up t lo public pressure to force them to comply with the constitution and laws.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

In the absence of legal protections, there is still no benefit of talking to police, even in the face of torture. Thugs have already made the decision to hurt you by the time they pull you off the street, nothing you say will convince them otherwise, and everything you say will be twisted to justify their behavior.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

which the streamer said felt anything but random and “routine”.

I think the issue is this is routine...

He said the officer was particularly focused on his criticism of Israel’s prosecution of the Gaza war, asking him: “Do you like Hamas? Like, do you support Hamas? Do you think Hamas is a resistance group?”

In response, Piker said he told the officer that he was a “pacifist” and wanted “the endless bloodshed to end”.

If he had said anything close to "yes" to those questions, they'd have called him a terrorist and sent him to the death camp.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I know I am on lists. I flew out of ORD yesterday. I have TSAPrecheck. Metal detector flagged me for “random” additional screening, which means body scanner. Body scanner flagged my groin, I lifted my shirt to show my belt buckle. “No, it’s lower than that.” I got a big old feel up for my trouble.

I don’t even have two testicles. Now I know I’m on lists. That shit was not random.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

He does like and support Hamas, he proudly says it every other time but wimps out when there's no camera on him.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee 0 points 4 hours ago

I mean let's assume he does support Hamas (he doesn't, the furthest I've really seen him go is saying their resistance is justified in the face of genocide). But if we assume he does personally like them, should that put you in prison? It's clear they were trying to get him to say something that they could detain him for, which is then pretty understandable why he "wimped out" in that situation. The fact that they were asking him about that to potentially detain him over it is insane and clearly a first amendment violation.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Is he actually a pacifist? That was not my impression.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, all those times he advocates for the end of wars. Extreme bloodthirst, that Hasan, not wanting children to be killed.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You don’t have to be a pacifist to not want children to be killed. Pacifism is a very strong stance against violence that very few people adopt.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

... cool. That's what he said he is, so unless you have evidence he isn't (not sure how) I'm going to agree with him that he's a pacifist.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I’m not claiming he isn’t but considering I’ve not heard a word from him about this before today it doesn’t seem likely. He’s also made supportive statements of Hamas and Luigi Mangione—both very clearly not pacifists.

I mean, I don’t blame him for lying to get out of there but if he really is a pacifist that would be of interest to me since I find pacifism an interesting topic.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 30 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know why he cooperated instead of what everyone should always do when arrested: demand a lawyer and then shut the hell up.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not sure if you have a right to a lawyer in an interview. I think you would have to wait to be arrested but then you could go into holding for who knows how long.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 12 points 17 hours ago

You do have a right to a lawyer for an extended interview, but only as a US citizen. If they allege you’re a non-citizen, I’m not sure what your recourse is then.

[–] Zealousideal_Fox_900@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, all I wish is that they kept him longer. A day without tankie trash is a goddamn good one.