this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
186 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23500 readers
2958 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 days ago (4 children)

A two-hour "interview" is more an intimidation tactic than an "interview":

Piker, recounting the incident on his Twitch live stream on Monday, said he was led to a private room at Chicago O’Hare airport and interviewed for nearly two hours about his political views.

“The goal here is to put fear into people’s hearts, to have a chilling effect on speech that, like, the government is unafraid of intimidating you,” Piker said. “Does this stop me from saying whatever the fuck I want to say? Of course not. Don’t be ridiculous. But the reason why I wanted to talk about it was to give you more insight into what the government is doing, and to speak out against this sort of stuff.”

His responses were brilliant - and I'm taking note:

Piker repeatedly described the exchange as “cordial” but said he was transparent with the officer interviewing him that he planned to speak out about his experience, which the streamer said felt anything but random and “routine”.

Assuming the officer was familiar with his online commentary, Piker said he was candid about his views, telling the agent he was “not fond” of the US president.

He said the officer was particularly focused on his criticism of Israel’s prosecution of the Gaza war, asking him: “Do you like Hamas? Like, do you support Hamas? Do you think Hamas is a resistance group?”

In response, Piker said he told the officer that he was a “pacifist” and wanted “the endless bloodshed to end”.

“I just kept repeating that over and over again,” he said, describing the line of questioning as “insane” and a violation of his first amendment rights.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

His responses were brilliant - and I'm taking note

No. Never talk to police.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is no police and right to a legal defense anymore in the US. Just goons.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not true. Don’t comply in advance.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didnt meant to say that you should give them anything, just that you shouldnt expect to be granted the rights you might expect. They will absolutely just put you in a cell for days, weeks, months if you dont answer their questions. People should be prepared for that.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Don’t expect it, demand it. Dissidents like Rumeya Ozturk have been freed after pursuing justice in the courts. What you say could happen but then it will be up t lo public pressure to force them to comply with the constitution and laws.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

In the absence of legal protections, there is still no benefit of talking to police, even in the face of torture. Thugs have already made the decision to hurt you by the time they pull you off the street, nothing you say will convince them otherwise, and everything you say will be twisted to justify their behavior.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

He's discussed how he did this to learn more about the process, and only because he's in a position of privilege being a public figure which gives him some measure of protection.

He has stressed that normal people should never talk to ICE or the police, except to clarify if they are being detained or to request a lawyer.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

which the streamer said felt anything but random and “routine”.

I think the issue is this is routine...

He said the officer was particularly focused on his criticism of Israel’s prosecution of the Gaza war, asking him: “Do you like Hamas? Like, do you support Hamas? Do you think Hamas is a resistance group?”

In response, Piker said he told the officer that he was a “pacifist” and wanted “the endless bloodshed to end”.

If he had said anything close to "yes" to those questions, they'd have called him a terrorist and sent him to the death camp.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know I am on lists. I flew out of ORD yesterday. I have TSAPrecheck. Metal detector flagged me for “random” additional screening, which means body scanner. Body scanner flagged my groin, I lifted my shirt to show my belt buckle. “No, it’s lower than that.” I got a big old feel up for my trouble.

I don’t even have two testicles. Now I know I’m on lists. That shit was not random.

[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

He should have leaned in and answered those questions with, "Are you a Nazi?", with a dead serious stare into the guy's soul.

[–] StayDoomed@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And the interviewer wouldn't have given a shit.

[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

🙄 We got a genius over here.