I really like that it tracks speed. Being able to tell officials that a significant portion of drivers are speeding seems like a great first step when requesting stop signs or speed bumps.
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
47 points (89.8% liked)
Technology
65819 readers
4936 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The problem is the $200+ sensor. I'd love to be able to track this sort of data, but not until doppler radar prices drop.
It’s possible to still track speed using a video feed instead. You just have to know the distance between two static points within the videos frame. Time naught = passes first static point, time final = passes second static point.
Velocity = distance / time
Although I’m not sure how or if this would impact the battery life of the device.
Yeah, but I'm not allowed to just video tape the street all day long. A Doppler radar that gives me data to argue for a permanently installed speed control on the other hand would be fine
Really? At least where I'm located, you're allowed security cameras anywhere there isn't reasonable assumption of privacy.
In Germany you are not allowed to permanently film public space, that includes streets and sidewalks
Damn! I didn't realize the radar was so expensive.
Speed bumps are such a shitty solution to speeding. I’d prefer speeders to speed bumps.
Personally I'd rather get hit by a car going 10mph than 30. Even better would not be getting hit at all, and lower speed means more time to react.
Giants trucks and SUVs are getting more and more prevalent and don’t have to slow down as much. This trend doesn’t appear to be slowing down. You can’t make the bumps big enough otherwise it’s going to wreck cars. People also haul ass immediately after getting off the bump, so you end up with lovely brake squeals and engine sounds for a few hundred feet of decreased speed. They prematurely wear suspension components and brakes and lead to increased fuel usage.
They’re shit and I’m so glad I’ve moved out of the southern US and back into snow country where speed bumps simply can’t exist. I don’t know why speeding through residential areas is so much less prevalent in the north, where there are far fewer speed bumps, but I love it.
None of that agrees with my own experience. Plows don't seem to have any trouble with them around here, but they still manage to keep traffic slow.
Ideally we'd have streets engineered for traffic calming, but that would take an incredible amount of time and effort in dense areas, so I'll take the speed bumps.
Why not 1mph then?
I'd rather your car get fucked up than a person.
Dope, I’ll get a large SUV or truck to replace my small hatchback so I don’t have to slow down at all. Larger vehicles improve pedestrian safety right?
Speed bumps are a bandaid being used as a solution. They fuck with emergency vehicles, encourage rapid braking and acceleration, incentivize getting a larger vehicle, reduce gas mileage, and create noise from braking and acceleration. I’ll take literally any other traffic calming measure over a speed bump.
They’re a hell of a lot better than nothing.
They're actively worse than nothing.
I love more surveillance
Yes, most of us have better thi...
And you should improve your thi too.