this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
47 points (89.8% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
4936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works -2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Speed bumps are such a shitty solution to speeding. I’d prefer speeders to speed bumps.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Personally I'd rather get hit by a car going 10mph than 30. Even better would not be getting hit at all, and lower speed means more time to react.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Giants trucks and SUVs are getting more and more prevalent and don’t have to slow down as much. This trend doesn’t appear to be slowing down. You can’t make the bumps big enough otherwise it’s going to wreck cars. People also haul ass immediately after getting off the bump, so you end up with lovely brake squeals and engine sounds for a few hundred feet of decreased speed. They prematurely wear suspension components and brakes and lead to increased fuel usage.

They’re shit and I’m so glad I’ve moved out of the southern US and back into snow country where speed bumps simply can’t exist. I don’t know why speeding through residential areas is so much less prevalent in the north, where there are far fewer speed bumps, but I love it.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

None of that agrees with my own experience. Plows don't seem to have any trouble with them around here, but they still manage to keep traffic slow.

Ideally we'd have streets engineered for traffic calming, but that would take an incredible amount of time and effort in dense areas, so I'll take the speed bumps.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

Why not 1mph then?

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'd rather your car get fucked up than a person.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Dope, I’ll get a large SUV or truck to replace my small hatchback so I don’t have to slow down at all. Larger vehicles improve pedestrian safety right?

Speed bumps are a bandaid being used as a solution. They fuck with emergency vehicles, encourage rapid braking and acceleration, incentivize getting a larger vehicle, reduce gas mileage, and create noise from braking and acceleration. I’ll take literally any other traffic calming measure over a speed bump.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They’re a hell of a lot better than nothing.

They're actively worse than nothing.