this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
895 points (98.8% liked)

politics

23369 readers
3320 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Doesn't even know the presidential oath he pledged.

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 182 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

This is the oath he had to make when he took office.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Right, but was he lying when he said it? He's not sure.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

He had his fingers crossed...

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If I recall, he didn't even place a hand on the Bible.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Pretty crazy that it's sworn in the Bible when the state is supposed to be separated from the church

[–] Mooncheeze@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure each person chooses a document/book to swear on that is core to them. So most people in the US would choose the Bible because they identify as Christian, but if a Jewish person or Muslim person was sworn in they could choose the Torah or Quran. And a non-religuous person could choose anything that they could convinceably argue is important/core to their values.

Disclaimer: I did no research right now to confirm this but that's what I remember.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

I remember one politician being sworn in with a stack of comics.

Found it

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

You think he was awake for that part?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 131 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Pressed whether his administration is following the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which says no person "shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," Trump said he wasn't sure.

"I don't know. It seems – it might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials," he said. "We have thousands of people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on Earth."

It might say that? Might? This isn't something that is debatable you hippopotamic dung heap. That's what it fucking says.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago

"Well yeah it says that but it'd be pretty inconvenient, so..."

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Yeah, 3 million trials to catch the thousands of criminals in his own words... or maybe instead of trials first, they could maybe only be rounded up if there is any actual reason to believe they are a criminal in the first place. Then it would only be thousands of trials and all the problems being caused by rounding up 900+ innocent people per 1 criminal, would all of a sudden go away.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 113 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

They don't care. All they care about is their in-group is strong and the out-group is punished. They're shitty people.

[–] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 39 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I saw a guy today with two bumper stickers. One said "Trump" the other said "I love the constitution". I wonder what he would say about this?

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 43 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nonsense. He would say nonsense. Because they don't care. They care as much about sounding serious as they do about other people.

load more comments (1 replies)

I'm sure he'd be very upset if he could read.

[–] Lightsong@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They don't really love The Constitution. They only like the first two.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

"don't know" ?? isn't that like the first thing in his job description?

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes. In fact, you couldn't be more correct about the matter.

I would describe his response to the question as fully preposterous.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I would describe it as a dereliction of duty.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If Biden said that the headline would be "Sleepy Dementia Joe Biden Doesn't Remember Oath of Office He Took Three Months Ago". It would be brought up in every segment on every news station for weeks. Trump says it and the news is like "That's kinda weird... Anyways, wonder what Elon is doing..."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 57 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED! THIS MAN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY RESPONSIBLE POSITION! HE SHOULDN'T BE IN CHARGE OF A LEMONADE STAND MUCH LESS A COUNTRY! WHY DID AMERICA ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN! THE MAN DOESN'T WANT TO DO HIS JOB OF UPHOLDING THE CONSITUTION! THAT'S LIKE A DOCTOR SAYING THEY DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH! TRUMP AND ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS NEED TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON! WHY HAS THIS MADNESS GONE ON SO LONG!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

-President Trump, just this year.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"to the best of my abilities" is the loophole here

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

He doesn't know what the Declaration of Independence is — something that's taught all through grade and middle school in the U.S. The odds are he has no idea what that pesky Constitution says, nor does he care.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago

The only time when "love and unity" isn't the correct answer he uses it.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 47 points 3 days ago (7 children)

This what you get, no-vote cowards.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 39 points 3 days ago (7 children)

All I can do is laugh at this point. This regime is so buffoonish and so open with their intentions that I genuinely wonder how people fell for this shit and continue to believe it. Are we really this fucking dumb ?

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Yeah, we sit around and laugh about how stupid he is while he ignores the law and constitution to the detriment of the freedom of citizens and immigrants alike.

We are literally that stupid.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)

It’s ok, he learned his lesson

-Susan Collins

[–] Zimroxo@lemm.ee 33 points 3 days ago (4 children)

If this comment doesn't make the case for impeachment idk what does

Upholding the constitution is the most basic part of the job.

If he "doesn't know" if he can do that he is unfit for the position and should be removed immediately. Not even counting all the other violations of the constitution his administration has committed in just the first 100 days alone

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

Traitor cunt.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Oh he literally forgot the oath of the presidency? Sounds like a good reason to invoke the 25th amendment.

[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

He does not. He's above any and all laws. I don't know why, but he his. The Constitution is meaningless to a king.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"I don't know" the defense of criminals and toddlers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 20 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I’ve got it! Let’s wring our hands about this while we continue to do nothing. Wait until it’s too late, and THEN start to fight back. That’ll show ‘em!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (5 children)

What does it take to get this guy out of office? Genuine question. We impeached this guy like twice but it didn't go through

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago

A coffin is the only way. It’ll probably be easier to secede.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, I don't know either. I mean he's supposed to, and he swore an oath to, but if nobody is going to enforce that then must he really? What happens if/when he doesn't?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At this point I’m just curious how long this will go on. What would have to tilt for a group of politicians to overhaul his ass and the r’s supporting him?

[–] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I believe it will continue until the politicians are scared of an angry mob kicking in their door.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump probably had his fingers crossed while he took the oath.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I always go back to that early coronavirus briefing where a reporter questioned his authority to dictate state government lockdown policies and he just sat there stunned, repeating "when you're the president your authority is total because you have total authority, it's total..." It's been clear for years that this fucking guy never understood the job description, and rather than learning anything from experience, he's having it rewritten. The constitution isn't going to save us from that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Turns out as long as they have ( R ) next to their name, the president can operate with all the integrity of a five year old trying to get out of cleaning their room

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (8 children)

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

Yes. Yes it does. And there are plenty of them who want more of this.

And I don't even blame the MAGA morons any more. I blame the "progressive" Democrats and so-called "independents" who decided to stay home in November and allow Trump to return to power because Kamala Harris had the audacity to commit sins like running for President while being a black woman, campaigning with Liz Cheney that one time, and not being left enough for their liking, so obviously the only reasonable thing to do was to let Trump return to power.

How's that working out for y'all, you fucking chodes?

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've been saying this for a long time.

The people who stayed home or voted third party are still trying to blame Dems for this, because the Dems didn't try hard enough and "didn't inspire them".

Yeah? Well if you need a politician to inspire you to show up and fill out a piece of paper that will help protect marginalized groups, then you're a piece of shit.

I'm not a Dem. Never will be. But I understood what was on the line.

Gaza is gonna get glassed, my gay and trans loved ones are in immediate danger, among God knows how much more heinous shit is going down.

They said they were gonna do this. And a huge group of people who wanted to be seen as morally pure decided to sit it out to feel superior.

You're not superior. You're a monster. The Dems shouldn't have to "inspire" you to stop a fascist regime. It's American exceptionalism at it's fucking worst.

Fuck ALL of them. All of em.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›