this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
876 points (91.4% liked)

memes

14616 readers
3178 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 269 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (9 children)

Millennials are old enough to remember analog cameras and photos of people with red eyes. Man, people need to update their definition of which generation is “young.”

[–] teft@lemmy.world 126 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The oldest millennials are in their early 40s now but to boomers they will always be teens.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 51 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Using the most common definition of those born 1981-1996: Oldest millennials turn 44 this year, youngest turn 29. Next year we'll officially transition to "30s to mid 40s."

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wow thanks I'm going to go cry now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

And people acting like "boomers" are now usually Gen-x.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

True. It is not a boomer who made that meme. It is either a troll or yet another bitter Gen X.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 67 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Even the digitals you had in the 00's didn't have very good red eye correction (if any at all)

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 28 points 6 days ago

I distinctly remember the first digicams to be worse than analogue in this regard

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It was so bad that the PC software that came with the camera often had a red eye removal feature. I remember being fascinated when I figured out you could use it on things other than eyes and it just took the red out of anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 44 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Millenials" just means "people younger than me" now.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)

And at the same time, “boomer” means anyone over 50, somehow. Soon I will be a boomerlennial.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hoch@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

Hell, even the older Gen-Z grew up with analog cameras, VHS players, paper maps, and no computers.

I'm not sure people realize zoomers are almost 30, and millennials are nearing 50.

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

im 40. im a millenial.

...im old

<.<

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

Wait until they find out about GenAlpha

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Boomer forgot how millennials are old enough to have had to have film developed.

[–] Rinna@lemm.ee 15 points 5 days ago

I'm gen z and I still remember that time.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Red eyes also happen on digital photos.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 66 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Mate I'm a millennial and I had my photos developed at the chemists. You're thinking of gen z.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (8 children)

You're thinking of young gen z. I am gen z and as a kid I also had some of my photos developed.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 66 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Millennial? No we don't we were there the whole time...

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Right? Who made this? What millennial doesn't remember red eye, it was in every damn photo when I was a kid and Im not a particularly old millennial.

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 64 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm a Millenial, grew up with a polaroid. This meme is just wrong.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

Even beyond that the 1980s is like the start of millennials. I'd ask if this was made by LLMs but I'd expect even those to get something that dumb correct.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How, uh, young do you think millennial are exactly? Pretty much all of us were around for cameras before phones.

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 7 points 6 days ago

I had a super cool N64 film camera that I took with me to sleepovers and took lots of shitty photos with because I was a dumbass kid that didn't know anything about photography.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

When the fuck do we get to retire from the "young and stupid" category?

Also, I had red eyes in most photos from my child- and teenhood. I spent a lot of money on film in my teens before I got my first phone with a proper camera in 2007.

Next you're gonna condescendingly explain what a floppy disc or a cassette tape is too? Even Gen z is old enough to know about those.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I don't think you properly understand how generations work.

  • A Boomer is anyone older then me who I disagree with.
  • A millennial is anyone younger then me who I disagree with.
  • Someone from Gen Z is anyone younger than me who uses a technology (usually a social media site) I don't like.
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago

Millenials grew up going into a store to have photos developed from film.

[–] FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 32 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I, Gen Z, am old enough too remember the red eyes on photos? What is this trying to say xd

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 days ago

That people make shit up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (4 children)

People call "millennials" young because they are old but too proud to say "teenagers".

Plus the generational infighting is what the ruling class will use to replace or supplement the culture war.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Millennials are between 29 and 44. They are turning into the old generation.

This meme feels like it is 10 or more years old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 23 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I'm a millennial and my first camera used film cassettes similar to these ones.

collapsed inline media1000001644

[–] phudgins@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

110 cameras were the absolute best!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jedibob5@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Wait, do digital cameras not do the red eye effect? Now that I think about it, I don't think I've seen a photo with red eye in it in a long time, but I had always assumed that was a consequence of the camera flash, not the film...

Edit: TIL that camera redeye does come from the flash, but it hasn't been much of a thing these days because today's phones/cameras adjust the flash timing to compensate. Thanks for the replies!

[–] superkret@feddit.org 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hardly anyone takes photos with a flash anymore.
Phones instead crank up the sensitivity and use AI to get rid of the noise (=draw an image that vaguely resembles what's in front of the camera).

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

The sensors themselves are also slightly better than 20 years ago, much less 40. Meaning they can probably produce a nicer image before all the AI shit.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It was the flash. That's why cameras flash earlier now.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Oh god , remember the anti red eye flash that strobed for a second before the flash?

I still don’t understand how that worked. At the time I thought it was “getting your eyes used to the bright light so they wouldn’t turn red with the big flash,” but that definitely doesn’t make sense.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I still don’t understand how that worked. At the time I thought it was “getting your eyes used to the bright light so they wouldn’t turn red with the big flash,” but that definitely doesn’t make sense.

I understood it as the red eyes you see in photos is the wide open iris of an eye you're photographing zooming in on the blood vessels in the back of the eye. Flashing bright light before the photo makes the iris of the person you're photographing contract significantly, so you can't see the blood vessels in the back of the eye anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 14 points 5 days ago
[–] JPSound@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Mhhh... yes, we millenials who are approaching or are already in our 40s... what's all that red eye stuff about?

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Fun fact some may find disturbing, when you see a red-eye photo you're actually looking at the inside of the person's eyeballs. Red-eye in photos happens when a camera flash reflects off the back of the eye, specifically the choroid, a layer rich in blood vessels behind the retina. When the flash is too quick for the pupil to contract, the light enters the eye and bounces off this red tissue, giving you a great picture of the inside of their eyeballs. I hope everyone enjoys knowing that as much as I have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

One thing I found interesting is!how red-eye reduction works - it pre-flashes you eye briefly, before the main flash. So your pupils constrict and light doesn't reflect off the bottom of your eyes. Yes, you are part of the mechanism!

Some strange kind of bio-mechanical symbiotic mechanism is that!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Families wouldn't know demons walked among them until the photos were produced. Usually by then the demon clued in and left its host without a trace before it could be exorcised.

[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

SATANIC PANIC!!!

[–] Bonus@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

After holiday dinners, my grandpa would bust out the faux-leather bound Polaroid, mount it to a tripod and tell us all to stop moving, "It's not a movie camera!" Then he'd be amazed it was almost ready 5 seconds later. Every single time.

I remember when a flash was essentially an exploding bulb. Before me, they made a pop sound. In the 70s, there were cubes that rotated so you'd get multiple uses, IIRC. The real pros later had strobes but also, just bouncing the light off the ceiling and such cut down on the red eye which was really about light shooting directly into the eyes. That direct light also created harsh shadows and washed out features.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Let him find out the hard way that the demons won

load more comments
view more: next ›