this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
258 points (94.8% liked)

News

29035 readers
3640 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A family says their newborn son nearly bled to death and is fighting for his life after he was circumcised at a New York City hospital.

Tim and Gabrielle Groth said their son, Cole, underwent the circumcision at NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital in Manhattan, where he was born on March 31.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 139 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Stop ~~molesting~~ mutilating children would be my advice.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes of course, edited.
Thanks.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Its actually both with traditional Jewish circumcision.

Metzitzah B’peh (Direct Oral Suctioning)

When a baby is circumcised, some ritual Jewish circumcisers (mohelim) do a practice called metzitzah b’peh. Metzitzah b’peh is when the mohel uses their mouth to suck blood away from the baby’s circumcision wound as part of the circumcision ritual. After metzitzah b’peh, some babies can get an infection.

https://www.nyc.gov/site/doh/health/health-topics/safe-bris.page

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/baby-dies-herpes-virus-ritual-circumcision-nyc-orthodox/story?id=15888618

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yes the Jewish one is even more disgusting, but this was in a hospital, I hope they don't have such practices there. 🤮

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 hours ago

As a Jewish person there are traditions and practices that are better abandoned

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 116 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Circumcision is barbaric and backwards

Religion doesn't get a free pass either. Superstition is no basis for mutilating babies

America is one of the only places in the world that still thinks this disgraceful practice is OK.

All because they followed the ideas of a nutter who made cornflakes...

Shit's fucked

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 50 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Any cosmetic body alteration should only be done according to the will of the body-haver.

Poor little guy is brand new to the world and just wants sleep, warmth and food. Instead he gets this 💔

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 40 points 15 hours ago

At the will of the people who are supposed to be keeping him safe from harm...

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 99 points 14 hours ago (9 children)

Genital mutilation should be 100% illegal instead of only applying to girls.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I agree with you fully but there's a discrepancy that needs to addressed. Now, before you get the wrong idea, I'm NOT defending or excusing anybody here. The medical staff and the parents should be held responsible for nearly killing this newborn. Child genital mutilation of any kind should be banned.

Now, with that out the way, Male circumcision and female genital mutilation (or FGM, which is what I believe you're referring to when you say 'only applying to girls') are not directly comparable. Male circumcision typically only removes the foreskin of the penis whereas FGM removes the both the clitoris and labia (I shudder while typing this out). It would be like castrating the entire penis and testicles.

Again, this sort of thing should be banned and no child should suffer from the decisions they had no say in.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 18 points 11 hours ago

It would be like castrating the entire penis and testicles.

More like removing the glans and foreskin, but that doesn't make it much better. There are definitely varying degrees of awfulness, but it's all bad.

While there are some truly evil and horrific practices like removing the clitoris or sewing the vulva shut, some female genital mutation is "just" removing the clitoral hood, which is directly analagous to the foreskin.

Most people can agree that this practice is deeply wrong, and that it is still genital mutilation. And so I think categorizing male genital mutilation separately as "circumcision" is downplaying it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works 51 points 16 hours ago (13 children)

cut off usefull natural things without consent...win stupid prizes

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] pulido@lemmings.world 50 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Why do parents keep choosing to cut up the genitals of their baby boys?

Is it because the dad had his penis cut up for him, and therefore he must do it to his son because "nothing is wrong with his dick"?

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago

In America at least most people don't really consider it until the kid is born. Then in the post birth rush of things happening someone asks if you want to circumcise your kid. Most Dads will say "well I'm circumcised, so I guess" and his dad said "well I'm circumcised, so I guess" and his dad said "well I'm circumcised, so I guess" and his dad said "HE IS BORN OF SIN! We must circumcise him to discourage sinful behavior!"

Most people really don't think too deeply about most things, try not to over think it

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 hours ago

Don’t forget the people who think they have to do it because the sky daddy they invented told them to.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

It’s due to lack of education about not cutting it and indoctrination of what has been societal norms. It’s much less nefarious than you think on the part of many parents. Most people don’t generally think about this ahead of time and research it.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 45 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why do they still perform such barbaric rites in the 21st century in the first place?

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I mean look who's sitting in the oval office. Science has progressed but most humans have not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 45 points 15 hours ago

But hey, on the plus side, they helped cure him of... I mean prevented... I mean...

What again?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 36 points 7 hours ago

Stop mutilating your children.

Stupid fucking parents.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 33 points 13 hours ago

"Days after Cole's birth, doctors placed a stent in him to address a known heart disease he was born with."

I would wager that if the kid has heart disease and a stent, they likely put him on blood thinners as well. Source: Am on blood thinners following a stent.

How much do you want to bet the asshats who suggested circumcision were blissfully unaware of what happens when you cut someone who is on blood thinners?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

As a Jewish person im absolutely ashamed that my people still practice mutilation. When a tradition causes severe medical problems it should not continue.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 27 points 10 hours ago

It's not even strictly a Jewish thing, as much as it is just an American thing at this point. My parents were only mildly Christian and got me circumcised at the recommendation of the doctor. They didn't really think much about it because being circumcised is just "the norm". My dad is circumcised, and my mom said she wanted to make sure I looked like my father (why she expected me to be catching so many glances of dad-dong in life, I'll never know).

That said, whether or not it should be, a circumcision is still a very routine procedure, so it's kinda astounding that they botched it so badly. Hopefully the kid makes it without any lasting damage.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 31 points 11 hours ago (8 children)

It's ironic because the whole reason I'm even here on lemmy is because I was permabanned from reddit for telling someone to crawl back in their hole because they were defending circumcision while claiming female genital mutilation was abhorrent. As if mutilating a penis is perfectly fine but don't dare mutilate a vulva.

I know this isn't the main topic here but it just reminds me that body shaming men is okay but body shaming women isn't. Especially when it comes to sex organs.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I love how everyone loves "big dick energy" and "small dick energy", but if someone said "loose pussy energy" and "tight pussy energy" it's practically a hate crime lol.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How about we just stop insulting anyone's genitals instead?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 23 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

there's another pointless bullshit stone age tradition that's long overdue for going the fuck away forever

christopher hitchens (R.I.P.) says it better than anyone ever has or will:

https://youtu.be/Xx_ov2NiNo4

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 8 hours ago

In parenting classes in my liberal area, the nurses will say "I'm required to tell you that circumcision has medical benefits". Then they fume how it's based off bad research and cut themselves short. "However it's not like your son will be lined up for a nude photo. You can break the cycle of trauma". I'm lucky to live here.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Unless you’re some religious nut job, there is zero benefit and a lot of harm you can do by circumcising. So stop doing it.

EDIT: I was wrong, there is some medical reasons for the procedure later in life to address problems.

[–] Captain_Buddha@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This is a general statement, and not factual. To say there is zero benefit (across the board): wrong. There are benefits, medically, for specific people with issues that warrant it. I had a later-in-life circumcision for medical problems, so I know. To say it is something you should do to a newborn: very wrong. This is something that has a fucked up history, and should only be done when needed (or wanted, I suppose) later in a person's life... of their own choosing.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I’m sorry, I hadn’t considered that it might be done later to correct a problem. I honestly hope you weren’t offended.

[–] ChanchoManco@lemm.ee 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

These exchanges are why I love Lemmy.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This has to be qualified more strongly. Most of the medical benefits of circumcision are apparent only after puberty. There is no medical reason to circumsize a baby.

load more comments (1 replies)

I married a woman of jewish descent, she’s not religious in any way though. It was alarming, the amount of people coming up to us and asking us about our child’s dick. Why do people think it’s any of their business? Since they over stepped and asked, I gave them the full answer, complete with how idiotic it is and how anyone who still practices it is a backwards ass religious nut, and how all those other reasons like hygiene are bullshit myths.

load more comments
view more: next ›