Or pirate for 0€.
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
1293 points (99.5% liked)
People Twitter
6867 readers
1968 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There was a time when almost everything was on Netflix. As a consumer, having all my content in one place for $10/mo is awesome, but according to capitalism, it is a problem that needed to be fixed.
The crazy thing is loads of people stopped pirating and paid for a streaming service that was affordable, worked, met thier needs.
Now it's all splintered with corporations wanting a piece of the pie.
Back to piracy, it is, then. Yarrr! ☠️
It won't stop until the system reaches its ultimate form and each movie has its own subscription service.
So, buying physical media again lol
except that you don't have any sort of long terms rights to it and it costs more.
And they know when we watch, pause, fast forward..
..and all your ID
load more comments
(2 replies)
It really did hurt my ressources for pirating though. After not downloading anything for years, finding the right sites and proxies again was hard.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The part that's wildest to me is that nowadays with all the ways services are trying extract more value from their users (ads, increasing rates, reducing library size, restricting access to features, etc ) plus the DRM, the media consumption experience of just having the media files is so much better than the experience one can have through most of the streaming services or even DVDs with all of the unstoppable prerolls
Whether you rip your own DVDs (legally murky) or you're just watching a bunch of public domain silent films, or pirating, it's really hard to beat just having the .mkv and opening it in your player of choice.
About the only way to compete with that is one decent service with good quality, no ads, an extremely wide collection and minimally invasive DRM
load more comments
(1 replies)
Movies were on Netflix, TV shows were on Hulu. It was great.
Once Netflix started on their whole “half of all our offerings are going to be original content” is when it began to go downhill. Literally no one (aside from executives) was sitting around going “man, I can’t wait until Netflix starts making shows and movies!” They were a service. That’s all they ever needed to be.
I think they were forced into it when the other companies decided they could make some of that sweet netflix money, so they stopped licensing to netflix and built their own services. Netflix had no choice but to build their own content.
Idk I know I was pretty excited for Netflix's early original content because the proposition was like "HBO, but on the internet and you can watch it any time" and they were doing big budget stuff. Things only went south when they didn't keep up the HBO level quality and ruined their reputation to the point where I see "Netflix original" and immediately think "garbage TV"
load more comments
(2 replies)
Everyone wants to run a subscription service, until they have everyone on a subscription. Then instead of celebrating that they won capitalism, they go and start with the exclusive extra addons and upgrades. Because unfortunately no company in the history of companies has ever said that's it, we're making enough money, let's relax.
actually, plenty of companies say exactly that.
The thing is, they're small privately owned companies. not giant corporations.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Or even better, "even though you pay for the ad free subscription, this video is only available with ads".
Streaming becoming cable 2.0 is one of the biggest disappointments in the entertainment industry.
Streaming is still better for now. Wait until you can only have bundled services with mandatory ads with a minimum year long commitment.
Agreed. Also, the camera detects when we close our eyes or mute the audio and pauses the ads when we disengage from them.
No, you can't. It's $14.99 and in a few years you're going to lose access to it. Fuck you. Give us money.
...fuck you.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The Last Of Us season 2 being on a different, new subscription service is very much the last straw.
load more comments
(2 replies)
DVDs are dirt cheap, plentiful as fuck, don't have DRM bullshit to have to deal with, last for decades when stored properly, and still look pretty damn good with deinterlacing. Plus, they don't run any of the risks associated with piracy. Am I allowed to copy my DVDs onto my hard drive? That may be a legal gray area. But can they see that I copied my DVDs to my hard drive? Of course not. And I'm not making my ISOs and MKVs available to the world for download.
Spend 4 bucks on a used DVD. Give her the ol'
dd if=sr0 of=~/Videos/Movies/Title.iso
And keep the disc for basically forever. Copy it again if something happens to your file. EZPZ. Plus, it's cool to own a physical thing imo.
One last thing: DVDs come with subtitles. I have a hard time understanding spoken words. I like to read my movies as I watch them. Makes it easier to know what's going on without cranking the volume to 11. Speaking of which, the menu for the Spinal Tap DVD is excellent.
Plus they have extras which if you really like a movie could be a lot of fun
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
And it’s never anything in demand either. It’s always some random movie you came across on Wikipedia when you were scrolling through some actor’s filmography, and a minor interest was sparked. These companies create no value and hoard wealth and power. The whole copyright regime is tyrannical.
99% of these problems would be solved if copyright lasted a reasonable amount of time. IMO copyright should last for 50 years from the date of publication or the life of the original creator, whichever is longer. That way the author has control over their work during their own lifetime, and like an author's husband won't just be screwed if his wife published a blockbuster book and then dies soon after, but we don't have Disney milking shit from the 1920s for a hundred years. It's absurd to me that I have to pay Amazon $4 to watch Citizen Kane, a movie that came out before my grandparents were born, and that's the only legal way to watch it. Literally nobody who was involved in making that movie is still alive to benefit from it, it's only people making money from doing literally nothing.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I think we should be able to co-op a digital library... Say, the Internet archive seems to be just that!
Why is it under constant attack? Oh yeah, greed.
Why aren't we able to digitally host a communal library where each owner can "buy in" access by contributing a library?
Like a digital replication of each piece of physical media owned by a person?
load more comments
(3 replies)
.arr me matey
Yo ho! Yo ho!
Capitalism never learns. I was off of pirating for over a decade because things were actually somewhat affordable and you didn't have to jump through hoops to access everything. I'm right back in it, pirating everything, fuck these business school graduate scumbags.
Arrr, me hearty! Batten down the hatches and prepare to set sail, ye scallywags!
That's only if it's an older movie. The latest Captain America is available to rent for $25, or to buy for $30.
Or you can do what I did, and sail the high seas for it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Literally this, I watch the rookie with my friends. Everything but the last season is on netflix. Want to watch the last season? Good luck!
Yarrtt.
view more: next ›