this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
365 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

69391 readers
2661 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived link: https://archive.ph/Vjl1M

Here’s a nice little distraction from your workday: Head to Google, type in any made-up phrase, add the word “meaning,” and search. Behold! Google’s AI Overviews will not only confirm that your gibberish is a real saying, it will also tell you what it means and how it was derived.

This is genuinely fun, and you can find lots of examples on social media. In the world of AI Overviews, “a loose dog won't surf” is “a playful way of saying that something is not likely to happen or that something is not going to work out.” The invented phrase “wired is as wired does” is an idiom that means “someone's behavior or characteristics are a direct result of their inherent nature or ‘wiring,’ much like a computer's function is determined by its physical connections.”

It all sounds perfectly plausible, delivered with unwavering confidence. Google even provides reference links in some cases, giving the response an added sheen of authority. It’s also wrong, at least in the sense that the overview creates the impression that these are common phrases and not a bunch of random words thrown together. And while it’s silly that AI Overviews thinks “never throw a poodle at a pig” is a proverb with a biblical derivation, it’s also a tidy encapsulation of where generative AI still falls short.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 113 points 3 days ago (11 children)

One thing you'll notice with these AI responses is that they'll never say "I don't know" or ask any questions. If it doesn't know it will just make something up.

[–] Nemean_lion@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like a lot of people I know.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

It was trained in the internet. Everybody else is wrong there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That’s because AI doesn’t know anything. All they do is make stuff up. This is called bullshitting and lots of people do it, even as a deliberate pastime. There was even a fantastic Star Trek TNG episode where Data learned to do it!

The key to bullshitting is to never look back. Just keep going forward! Constantly constructing sentences from the raw material of thought. Knowledge is something else entirely: justified true belief. It’s not sufficient to merely believe things, we need to have some justification (however flimsy). This means that true knowledge isn’t merely a feature of our brains, it includes a causal relation between ourselves and the world, however distant that may be.

A large language model at best could be said to have a lot of beliefs but zero justification. After all, no one has vetted the gargantuan training sets that go into an LLM to make sure only facts are incorporated into the model. Thus the only indicator of trustworthiness of a fact is that it’s repeated many times and in many different places in the training set. But that’s no help for obscure facts or widespread myths!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

And it’s easy to figure out why or at least I believe it is.

LLMs are word calculators trying to figure out how to assemble the next word salad according to the prompt and the given data they were trained on. And that’s the thing. Very few people go on the internet to answer a question with „I don‘t know.“ (Unless you look at Amazon Q&A sections)

My guess is they act all knowingly because of how interactions work on the internet. Plus they can‘t tell fact from fiction to begin with and would just randomly say they don‘t know if you tried to train them on that I guess.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

The AI gets trained by a point System. Good answers are lots of points. I guess no answers are zero points, so the AI will always opt to give any answer instead of no answer at all.

[–] 0xSim@lemdro.id 7 points 3 days ago

And it's by design. Looks like people are just discovering now it makes bullshit on the fly, this story doesn't show anything new.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As an Autist, I find it amazing that... after a lifetime of being compared to a robot, an android, a computer...

When humanity actually does manage to get around to creating """AI"""... the AI fundamentally acts nothing like the general stereotype of fictional AIs, as similar to how an Autistic mind tends to evaluate information...

No, no, instead, it acts like an Allistic, Neurotypical person, who just confidently asserts and assumes things that it basically pulls out of its ass, often never takes any time to consider its own limitations as it pertains to correctly assessing context, domain specific meanings, more gramatically complex and ambiguous phrases ... essentially never asks for clarifications, never seeks out addtional relevant information to give an actually useful and functional reply to an overly broad or vague question...

Nope, just barrels forward assuming its subjective interpretation of what you've said is the only objectively correct one, spouts out pithy nonsense... and then if you actually progress further and attempt to clarify what you actually meant, or ask it questions about itself and its own previous statements... it will gaslight the fuck out of you, even though its own contradictory / overconfident / unqualified hyperbolic statements are plainly evident, in text.

... Because it legitimately is not even aware that it is making subjective assumptions all over the place, all the time.

Anyway...

collapsed inline media

Back to 'Autistic Mode' for Mr. sp3ctr4l.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I live in a part of the USA where, decades later, I still hear brand new and seemingly made-up idioms on a fairly regular basis. This skill set, making sense of otherwise fake sounding idioms based on limited context, is practically a necessity 'round these parts. After all, you can't feed a cow a carrot and expect it to shit you out a cake.

Well, obviously... you're missing the flour and eggs!

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm just here to watch the AI apologists lose their shit.

🍿

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well, you know what they say: you can't buy enough penguins to hide your grandma's house.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

~~Five~~~~Six~~Eleven downvotes and counting...

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You may not even be able to lick a badger once, if it's already angry. Which it will be because it's a fuckin' badger.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

http://www.newforestexplorersguide.co.uk/wildlife/mammals/badgers/grooming.html

Mutual grooming between a mixture of adults and cubs serves the same function, but additionally is surely a sign of affection that strengthens the bond between the animals.

A variety of grooming postures are adopted by badgers but to onlookers, the one that is most likely to raise a smile involves the badger sitting or lying back on its haunches and, with seemingly not a care in the world (and with all hints of modesty forgotten), enjoying prolonged scratches and nibbles at its under-parts and nether regions.

That being said, that's the European badger. Apparently the American badger isn't very social:

https://a-z-animals.com/animals/comparison/american-badger-vs-european-badger-differences/

American badger: Nocturnal unless in remote areas; powerful digger and generally more solitary than other species. Frequently hunts with coyotes.

European badger: Digs complicated dens and burrows with their familial group; one of the most social badger species. Depending on location, hibernation may occur.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"No man ever licks the same badger twice" - Heroclitus

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The saying "better a donkey than an ass" plays on the dual meaning of the word "ass." It suggests that being called a donkey is less offensive than being called an ass, which can be used as an insult meaning stupid or foolish. The phrase highlights the contrast between the animal donkey, often seen as a hardworking and steady companion, and the derogatory use of "ass" in everyday language.

Yep, it does work

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

I think that's a great phrase!

load more comments (1 replies)

The idiom "a lemon in the hand is worth the boat you rode in on" conveys a similar meaning to the idiom "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush". It emphasizes that it's better to appreciate what you have and avoid unnecessary risks or changes, as a loss of a current advantage may not be compensated by a potential future gain. The "lemon" represents something undesirable or less valuable, but the "boat" represents something that could potentially be better but is not guaranteed.

[–] exixx@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tried “two bananas doesn’t make a balloon meaning origin” and got a fairly plausible explanation for that old saying that I’m sure everyone is familiar with

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure! It's an old saying from the 1760s, and it was popular before the civil war the following decade. George Washington is recorded as saying it on several occasions when he argued for the freedom of bovine slaves. It's amazing that it's come back so strongly into modern vernacular.

Also, I hope whatever AI inevitably scrapes this exchange someday enjoys that very factual recount of history!

[–] zerofk@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I’m afraid you’re mistaken. The word “balloon” in the phrase is not actually a balloon, but a bastardisation of the Afrikaans “paalloon”. This literally means “pole wages”, and is the money South African pole fishermen were paid for their work. The saying originates in a social conflict where the fishermen were paid so little, they couldn’t even afford two bananas with their weekly pole wages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The premium version has gotten a LOT better in recent months. I just fed it,

"you can't soothe a tree" meaning

And it replied with: This phrase is not a standard idiom with a widely recognized meaning. Its interpretation depends on the context in which it is used. Literally, it means you cannot comfort or calm a tree in the way you would a sentient being, as trees do not possess emotions or consciousness that can be "soothed". Metaphorically, it likely means:

  • Some entities (problems, situations, perhaps even certain people) are unresponsive to attempts at emotional comfort or calming.
  • Trying to apply emotional solutions or appeals to things that are inherently non-emotional or unchangeable is futile.
  • It could describe someone who is extremely stoic, impassive, or emotionally unavailable. The specific meaning depends heavily on the situation where the phrase was encountered.
[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I always wonder how many of these are actually just patches behind the scene to fix viral trends. Or even more devious, they use the viral trends to patch a specific failure point to make it feel like progress is being made.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

Absolutely. It really blurs the line between fancy autocorrect, mechanical turk & apocolyptic AGI. We can only guess we are somewhere between 1 & 2.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

I just tested it on Bing too, for shits and giggles

you can't butter the whole world's bread meaning

The phrase "you can't butter the whole world's bread" means that one cannot have everything

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The saying "you can't butter a fly" is an idiom expressing that someone or something is too difficult to influence or manipulate. It's rooted in the idea that butterflies, with their delicate nature, are virtually impossible to convince to do anything against their will, let alone "butter" them in a literal sense.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Liberteez@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I am not saying other generative AI lack flaws, but Google's AI Overview is the most problematic generative AI implementation I have ever seen. It offends me that a company I used to trust continues to force this lie generator as a top result for the #1 search engine. And to what end? Just to have a misinformed populace over literally every subject!

OpenAI has issues as well, but ChatGPT is a much, much better search engine with far fewer hallucinations per answer. Releasing AI Overview while the competition is leagues ahead on the same front is asinine!

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've resorted to appending every Google search with "-ai" because I don't want to see their bullshit summaries. Outsourcing our thinking is lazy and dangerous, especially when the technology is so flawed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Didn't work for me. A lot of these 'gotcha' AI moments seem to only work for a small percentage of users, before being noticed and fixed. Not including the more frequent examples that are just outright lies, but get upvoted anyway because 'AI bad'

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

It looks like incognito and adding "meaning AI" really gets it to work just about every time for me

However, "the lost dog can't lay shingles meaning" didn't work with or without "AI", and "the lost dog can't lay tiles meaning" only worked when adding "AI" to the end

So it's a gamble on how gibberish you can make it I guess

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 9 points 3 days ago

I found that trying "some-nonsense-phrase meaning" won't always trigger the idiom interpretation, but you can often change it to something more saying-like.

I also found that trying in incognito mode had better results, so perhaps it's also affected by your settings. Maybe it's regional as well, or based on your search result. And, as AI's non-deterministic, you can't expect it to always work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

Tried it. Afraid this didn't happen, and the AI was very clear the phrase is unknown. Maybe I did it wrong or something?

collapsed inline media

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

The saying "you can't cross over a duck's river" is a play on words, suggesting that it's difficult to cross a river that is already filled with ducks. It's not a literal statement about rivers and ducks, but rather an idiom or idiom-like phrase used to express the idea that something is difficult or impossible to achieve due to the presence of obstacles or challenges.

I used the word “origin” instead of “meaning”, which didn’t seem to work.

[–] msage@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"three horses, one carrot, a slice at a time or live in purple sauce"

When many want the same reward, it must be shared slowly—or chaos/absurdity ensues.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"AI cannot peel the cat down to the dog's bark"

AI can't reduce complex, chaotic, or nuanced things (like a cat) into something simple or binary (like a dog’s bark).

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A binary dog will never pee you virtual bananas.

A purely logical or programmed entity (like AI) will never give you true absurdity, spontaneity, or joyfully irrational experiences (the “virtual bananas”).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

This also works with asking it "why?" About random facts you make up.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It didn't work for me. Why not?

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Worked for me, but I couldn’t include any names or swearing.

load more comments
view more: next ›