this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
140 points (91.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

24186 readers
640 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

crossposted from irc

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I learned on VIM, but when I found Nano there was no going back.

[–] ztwhixsemhwldvka@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's like saying you ate sourdough but then discovered wonder bread

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

More like sourdough doesn't go good with everything. Different tastes for different things.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

It's time for you to find Micro. The cycle continues.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

wow, nano is usually everyone's first editor and them moving on to Vim. interesting to invert that. what do you like about nano?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ease of use. When it comes to coding I prefer a GUI as well.

I used Vim when I first installed Linux. It was painful but I used it. I found Nano and I stopped using Vim. No comparison in usability.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

yeah Vim takes a lot of effort to learn. Like any advanced tool. I will 100% always fire up nano when in a hurry. but i like trying to learn Vim as an exercise (in torture? idk haha)

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That depends a lot on when they started.

When I first installed a distribution where the base system only came with nano instead of standard editors, I was very confused (and very disappointed that this whas what they'd come up with as a "friendly" interface).

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

well, like the parent of my comment said, nano is a lot easier to use than vim or emacs. nano is much more like DOS edit or stuff like that. there are many memes about not being able to quit Vim, etc

The main things i learnt from vim are Escape :q and ^Z. Not a dig on vim, but it was quite a learning curve at the time when nano has been good enough for just about everything i do day to day.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Does nano have LSP support?

[–] AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont know what that acronym means. I just use nano as a basic text editor, its automatically showing me different colours XML now. I have used it as a text editor for code before, but if i knew i was going to be coding lots, id look at others like vim and emacs. Me using it is a result of it being the quickest tool to get the job done at the time 'efficiently' and i know there are more powerful ones out there.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I had to guess they're on about the "language server protocol"

[–] vala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 25 points 1 month ago

Back in the early 2000s I met some guy who had once sold a copy of edit.exe to some store as if it were some software he had written for managing orders and inventory. The folks at the store used windows, but they would open up edit.exe and it looked just like the stuff that the larger store chains used to manage their own orders... The guy just made a sample file and instructed them how to input data in a specific format that made it all look like a table, but it was just a text file with no validation of any kind.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i edit all my html in an actual physical notebook like a civilised person

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

wish i could find my old notepads full of BASIC and HTML lol

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

as a matter of fact many of my batch and basic thingies were made on the margins of my history notebooks

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

a fellow man of ~~culture~~ "why even bother with that theyre just text editors" i see

[–] acidowl@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] jxk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Viitor and emacsitor aren't even words

[–] gbuttersnaps@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I use emacs with evil, best of both worlds

[–] AutomaticUpdates@monero.town 4 points 1 month ago

Doom Emacs gang😎

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ed Is The Standard Text Editor

[–] y0din@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

edlin was my favorite for a long time 🙂

Edlin is a line editor, and the only text editor provided with early versions of IBM PC DOS,[1] MS-DOS and OS/2.[2] Although superseded in MS-DOS 5.0 and later by the full-screen MS-DOS Editor, and by Notepad in Microsoft Windows, it continues to be included in the 32-bit versions of current Microsoft operating systems.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edlin

edit: link and explanation of syntax used if anyone is interested. the w (write) and q (quit) commands made it somewhat similar to VI(M). https://www.computerhope.com/edlin.htm

[–] zerofk@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Finally someone mentions edlin! Real programmers don’t need to see more than a single line at a time.

[–] y0din@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

that is absolutely true and also 640Kb RAM should be enough for everyone 😂

all the hours and countless reboots spent optimizing config.sys and autoexec.bat to achieve 50kb more of available memory... good memories 🙂

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i just moved my files off to an external drive whenever my hdd got full haha

i didnt really trust my coding skills enough to come close to config.sys...

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

why did i never see it on my 32bit winxp then

[–] y0din@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Were you using Windows XP Home, by any chance?

That tool was only included with Windows XP Professional, and even then, it was a command-line utility—so unless you were specifically looking for it or browsing through the %windir%\system32 directory, you probably wouldn’t have noticed it.

The article I referenced didn’t specify exactly which 32-bit versions it came with or when it was removed—it just mentioned that it was still included in 32-bit Windows after the DOS era. I didn’t write the article myself, so I can’t really speak to its accuracy.

Personally, I used that edline a lot back in the DOS days starting around 1985, until I switched to Notepad in Windows 95 and later to VIM when I moved to Linux after Windows 98. I never really checked for it in newer versions of Windows after that. A quick Google search confirmed it wasn’t included in XP Home, which would explain why you never saw it.

Link to the forum I found this information about XP in: http://murc.ws/forum/hardware/general-hardware-software/49698-omg-edlin-still-lives-in-xp#post755768

(edit: fixed a typo, added reference link)

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

OHHHHH THAT EXPLAINS IT

yes im a home user

[–] Kojichan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I remember using Notepad for a long time for coding in Windows. Then I was introduced to UltraEdit. It was cool, but expensive. Jumped onto NotePad++ and I've been enjoying it lots.

I do also use IDEs, usually Codium based.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

cat <<EOF gang

[–] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

NeoVim with NVchad stomps both

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Then add tmux with terminal or tiling trminal and i3 amd you have the ultimate spacecraft

[–] Reptorian@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

I use KDE Kate for my coding. Scripting more accurately to some users, but I don't find a meaningful distinction.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Micro ftw!

(I also use Geany, Featherpad, Vim, ee(1), and JOE)

[–] lengau@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

text editor