this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
283 points (97.6% liked)

Canada

8706 readers
1441 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supporters of Canada’s F-35 purchase point to the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of contracts that Canadian companies have earned by supplying parts for the U.S. aircraft. That, in turn, has sustained or created Canadian aerospace jobs. But on Feb. 28, the National Post reported that Trump has told Lockheed Martin he wants those jobs back in the U.S. when the Canadian contracts come up for renewal.

During the 2015 election campaign, Justin Trudeau vowed his government would never purchase the F-35.

As prime minister, Trudeau continued to point out the Canadian military had no need for the F-35 and he blamed the Conservatives for agreeing to purchase a problem-plagued fighter jet. But, with the 2023 announcement, the Liberals not only committed to the acquisition, but also increased the number of jets to be bought to 88 from the 65 the Conservatives had wanted.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 46 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I recommend putting a brief description of Postmedia Network somewhere noticeable on that post. Sort of like an abstract for an essay, maybe.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Just complain about multiple problems with the jet and cancel the order. Ask for a refund on the remaining jet. If no refund is given, advice Krasnov Trump that they will be sold to china.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I mean yes but i also do not want a real war. Fascists looooove war. Americans too.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You really think anything Canada does is going to change the fascist's minds? They want to take Canada. They're going to try.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 2 points 4 days ago

I mean if it really comes to war i atleast hope that the rest of NATO stands together but that would probably come down to ww3 so chances are they do not. That might also be what Drumpf speculates on.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] lowleekun@ani.social 2 points 4 days ago

I mean in the moment the fascists in america have won and lewd the government, yes. I think we should however not forget that about the half of the americans oppose this. Maybe it's not too late (yes i know, huge amount of hopium).

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They lost the receipt so they can only get 50% store credit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He'd be OK with that.

Sell them to Cuba.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunfur82@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I remember before the purchase was made, I was really hoping the government would purchase the Swedish Saab Gripen. I think it was one of the finalists for consideration (that's what I remembered from a few news casts at the time, but not sure if it was an actual finalist, or just someone saying they thought it would be a good option.)

The main reason for me thinking we should have gone with the Saab, was that I trusted buying from Sweden more than the US. I can see the US putting some systems in place that could give them control or some way to negatively affect the F-35s. I remember someone saying that countries don't have friends, only interests, but I'd still trust Sweden more than the US to not betray us in some way.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago (8 children)

There's a problem with the engine. It's an US design and the US just blocked a sell to Colombia. I think Saab should make another design with the Typhoon engine or some other European engine that has roughly the same size and push.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

The biggest issue would be stopping sharing spares. Given the current government's proclivity for using any leverage they can get their hands on.... Well.... I'd be nervous if I'd bought them.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Saab Gripen

The fighter from the 80s?

[–] sunfur82@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

Yes, but it's been updated a lot since then, I think the current iteration is the E-series.

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Gripen E is newer than the F35

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

F16 (70s)? F18 (70s)? B2 (80s)? F22 (80s)?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The US is still reliant on the B-52 for most of it's bombing, and it's from... 1952.

In both cases, the internals have been utterly and completely updated, and the shape of airframe basically isn't broken and doesn't need fixing.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It was a serious finalist, and that's even more impressive when you considered that our airforce went into the bid already knowing they wanted the F-35.

They kept the bid's website up, and IIRC basically said "we're around if you change your mind".

I remember someone saying that countries don’t have friends, only interests

Charles de Gaulle. He was full of shit on that one, though. Countries have domestic politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago (8 children)

This would be easier if another ally (or an ally, rather) made a 5th gen fighter, but there are none. We'd be stuck either with ageing platforms or waiting another 10-15 years for Eoropeans to finish one of the 5th gens they're working on.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The problem is that in the event of a conflict with the US, those jets would be entirely unusable because they'd shut them down. And we'd be billions of dollars down.

It would be better to spend that money elsewhere, even if it's out of date, than to have nothing.

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Pretty sure we couldn't buy enough of anything to make a difference against the US in even the long term. Except nukes. Those are the only feasible deterrents we could use.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

Buys a shitload of drones. Just ask Russia how devastating those can be.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

If US attacked Canada it would be a nightmare for them. Canada is huge. If you think Russia is having a hard time in Ukraine thst is just a small taste of it.

We def need to cancel the f-35 program.

Trump has destroyed American exceptionalism.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

At that point China, Russia and America will be at their 6th

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

China and America kinda already are, China has it's J-36 and J-50 prototypes flying right now, America supposedly flew a prototype associated with it's next-gen fighter program, but there's just some pictures of airframes on tarmac that nobody can identify so they assume it must be the next-gen fighter.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 5 points 4 days ago

Well thats what we need to be putting our money in right now (speaking as a european). Even if america does not turn full authoritarian in the next 4 years and we get them back to our site, we can not sit this out right now. We need to be able to fight for our own interests, thats one of the few things Trump is right about (even though it is simply an excuse to drop us).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Defence analysts warn U.S. will ~~control key systems on F-35 fighter jets,~~ put~~ting~~ Canada at risk.

[–] imvii@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

100%. The USA is absolutely not to be trusted. It is a friend to itself only.

Canada should cancel the order and invest in nukes and drones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If our European friends want to start a made in Europe defense plan, ordering a boatload of next generation fighter jets from them seems helpful...

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Europe doesn't have a 5th gen fighter, and they're beholden enough to the US that they did nothing when we blew up their natural gas pipeline, forcing them to buy our natural gas at exorbitant prices, during winter and are trying to fund our war even after we've stopped. America's other vassals aren't going to help you stop America.

China exports the J-35, Russia exports the Su-57. Making Lockheed stock crater when even Canada abandons them would light a fire under more congress member's asses than anything else you can do.

Then again, it's not like GD, LM, and Boeing would ever let their politicians fuck up the bag.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

We've already seen that Boeing is willing and able to cause accidental falls from balconies.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

So buy from Russia instead because the US has become a Russian puppet and we can't trust them anymore?

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Gripen might be a stopgap, but it is an older platform. At least with updates it's at least considered a "4.5" generation fighter. F35 is pretty much the best option atm.

Planning ahead though, Canada needs to get involved with either GCAP (Global Combat Air Platform or FCAS (Future Combat Air System).

We can't realistically pull off another Avro Arrow with modern 5th/6th generation features by ourselves. We can partner with more reliable allies though, and help bolster our own defence aerospace industry at the same time. In either GCAP or FCAS, we would be the junior partner though.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think Canada needs to accept a stopgap measure - the Gripen, Typhoon, Rafale, or Super Hornet - and dive headfirst into GCAP. FCAS is tempting as well, but GCAP is farther along and the countries are probably closer in goals to Canada.

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I agree.

GCAP includes Japan (CPTPP partner), and they seem very motivated to not dawdle with getting a modern fighter. GCAP also includes the UK (CANZUK + NATO) and Italy (CETA/EU+NATO).

FCAS is France, Germany and Spain, off the top of my head, and has much less urgency. Of course that could be changing. They're all EU and NATO, so more eggs in a single basket, but more reliable than US.

One other edge to GCAP is that Sweden had considered joining GCAP, but backed out. They might get back in maybe? Saab is pretty damn competent as well. It would be an even better team. Plus if we went with Gripen and already had some cooperation with Saab, could be even easier to work together.

Perun had a good video a little while back… here it is https://youtu.be/TTjdEtHYDJ4

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Get drones and missiles instead. Stockpile them in locations kept secret from the US. Refit our submarines so they're capable of launching missiles again. Keep a few subs in the Caribbean at all times so they can hit their King's winter palace in Florida.

That would be the best deterrent, other than nukes of course... which we'd need missiles for anyway.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure how serious your comment is but anyway...what you're describing is a decades-long reorientation of military doctrine and procurement strategy. Getting a different multi-role fighter is already a huge expense with lots of ramifications but no need to throw the baby out with the bath water.

Edit: IMO, if you really wanted to alter air force strategy to deter the US, you should look to Sweden and Finland who have been facing an asymmetric threat for decades. Aquire the Gripen, train with the Swedes in how to run and operate a distributed air force of small independent units capable of generating and performing missions from random roads in the woods.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thijsje@social.vivaldi.net 8 points 5 days ago (5 children)

@NightOwl

Yeah we feel that issue as well. Hindsight being what it is we should have bought the Rafaele

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Typhoons lets gooooo

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Canada can perhaps purchase from Turkiye or South Korea. Turkiye’s fifth gen fighter had its maiden flight recently but it is still a few years away from entering service.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 3 points 5 days ago

The contract needs to be cancelled ASAP !!!

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί