AlolanVulpix

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)
  1. Yeah, that's why your point about "There was a point where Democracy didn’t exist, and it wasn’t that long ago" doesn't make any sense. Shall we return to the dark ages?
  2. I am in support of proportional representation, which can occur independent of political party, similar to FPTP.
  3. Ok, so you haven't addressed my point about political parties existing independent of FPTP. Also, I never even brought up tribalism once, that was the other commenter (nor am I even in favour of it).
  4. Yes, democracy only functions when everyone has a say in governance, as proportional representation guarantees. It is the best system of governance, and to say otherwise is shows how nonsensical your thinking is.
  5. Yes, we have a two party system because of plurality voting, which is described by Duverger's law. Elimination of political parties ... is impractical.
  6. Clearly, you are taking my responses personally. Good luck living life feeling constantly like you are the victim and holier than thou.
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 hours ago

In the conversation between you and me, where we already agree (mostly) on electoral reform, the stakes aren't high.

But otherwise, yes, the stakes are high.

I apologize if my discussions on proportional representation are annoying, that's not the intention. You can choose to ignore me or even block me if you feel inclined.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

There was a point where Democracy didn’t exist, and it wasn’t that long ago

Yeah, back when democracy didn't exist, humanity lived in misery compared to today's living standards.

We can do better than our less intelligent ancestors can’t we? Especially when we all agree generally that the systems we have aren’t working.

Yeah, the better system is called proportional representation.

political parties from the system wholly impractical

Believe it or not, there is no part of our FPTP electoral system entrenches that political parties in the first place. I know you might not like it, but it's factually the truth. They organically come about because people, it's the most efficient way to organize.

otherwise do not waste further time responding with wikipedia links you clearly do not understand.

You are a very angry person, lol. But regardless, Duverger's law is the reason we have a "two party" system.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago (10 children)

There isn't a modern democracy in the world that doesn't have political parties. And for good reason, it's wholly impractical. Even single party states such as China have political parties...

The reason we have two major parties is described in Duverger's law. You don't have to think I'm right or wrong, because this is just the reality.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (12 children)

But proportional representation does not require political parties to be a part of the electoral system.

See single transferable vote (STV): A Simple Guide to Electoral Systems. It's still a work in progress, but lays out a good framework for discussing electoral systems.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Can you explain more? What voting scheme did you have in mind?

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca -5 points 20 hours ago
  1. How is it a spin, when the results of the electoral system literally affect every facet of our lives?
  2. Perhaps the messaging isn't aimed towards individuals like yourself.
  3. If you're really bothered, the block function is available.
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well, voting for a political party that doesn’t support proportional representation is guaranteed to doom the PR movement.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca -3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I suppose, but it certainly draws attention to the movement. And on occasion discussion does come about, in which case that is the opportunity to convince people.

And in the past 2 weeks the !fairvote@lemmy.ca has grown by 60%, so clearly something I'm doing is working.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 13 points 22 hours ago (17 children)

And for letting us down on proportional representation: !fairvote@lemmy.ca

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

Given the Liberal's failings on proportional representation, I tend to think it's the latter: he doesn't want to take a position

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca -4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

It's okay, we're just having a conversation. Stakes aren't high.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/40374512

Electoral Renewal Canada on Bluesky

Did strategic voting matter in the Ontario Election?

My verdict is that a large number of people DID vote strategically in this election. However, I don't believe it was a determining factor.

It did deliver a massive advantage to sitting MPPs. Let's look at the numbers. (1/6)

🟧 NDP incumbents performed remarkably well.

Avg. NDP candidate: -5.5% (compared to '22) Ridings NDP won in '22: -0.7% Ridings w/ NDP inc. running for re-election: +3.0% (‼️)

This difference is unusual, but it's quite clear that the NDP benefitted >when they had a strong name to rally around. (2/6)

🟥 Liberal incumbents also overperformed.

Avg. OLP candidate: +6.1 Ridings w/ Liberal incumbent running for re-election: +13.4

In all elections, incumbents do have a name recognition advantage, but beating the median by more than 7% is notable. (3/6)

Here's why I think strategic voting was at play. Here is he swing for:

🟧 NDP candidates in OLP ridings: -10.0% (4.5% below avg.)

🟥 OLP candidates in NDP ridings: +0.8% (5.3% below avg.)

I think this shows, when there was a clear name to rally around, a noticeable % of NDP and OLP voters did (4/6)

Here is where I dispel some enthusiasm.

In 2018, if you bundled Liberal and NDP votes into one party, they would have won 82 seats.

In 2022, that number was down to 71.

In 2025, it was 61. Which means that even with "perfect" strategic voting, there would be no majority for the coalition. (5/6)

The fact is that, even as it seems that many Ontarians did attempt to vote strategically, it did not impact the outcome of the election.

If voters are frustrated that a third consecutive Ford government is being upheld by a 40% majority, perhaps we should consider proportional representation. (6/6)

 

FFRF on Bluesky

Bragging about low vaccination rates during a measles outbreak isn’t a flex—it’s reckless endangerment. Protecting children should come before politics or ideology. Public health isn’t a debate.

Measles 🦠

  • highly contagious! One person catching could spread it up to R~0~: ~17 other people, while COVID-19 has R~0~: ~3. That means measles is ~5.67× more contagious than COVID-19.
  • is unique in that measles wipes out existing immunity for other diseases. Measles can cause you to become infected to pathogens you were once immune to.
  • is caused by a virus, therefore antibiotics are wholly ineffective
  • can be vaccinated against 💉

Recognizing and Responding to Measles Symptoms

If you are travelling this spring, remain vigilant for measles symptoms. Measles typically starts with fever; red, watery eyes; runny nose; and, cough; followed by a red rash that spreads from the face to the rest of the body.

If you suspect you have measles while travelling in or returning to Canada:

  • Wear a well-fitting medical mask and minimize contact with others.
  • Inform a flight attendant, cruise staff, or border services officer upon arrival.

Stay Protected: Get Vaccinated

With measles cases rising worldwide and in Canada, keeping up with routine vaccinations is more critical than ever. Measles vaccination is highly effective in limiting transmission and preventing severe outcomes. If you are unsure of your vaccination status, check with your healthcare provider or local public health unit.

By staying vigilant and working together to increase measles vaccine coverage, we can prevent outbreaks and keep our communities safe against this preventable disease. The measles vaccine is the best way to protect you and your family.

If you think you or a family member has the measles, or you think you’ve been exposed to measles, call your health care provider immediately – do not go to a health care facility or office without calling ahead first

Please go get vaccinated, folks. Vaccines are demonstrated to be safe and effective time and time again.

Unimmunized 159 (89.8%) (from Public Health Ontario)

External links 🖇️

Title Publisher Date
📄About Measles 🇨🇦Ministry of Health (Government of Ontario)
📄Measles vaccines: Canadian Immunization Guide 🇨🇦Public Health Agency of Canada (Government of Canada)
📄Measles | Wikipedia Wikimedia Foundation
📄ENHANCED EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SUMMARY Measles in Ontario 🇨🇦Public Health Ontario (accountable to the Ontario Minister of Health) 2025-02-27
🎬Measles: Understanding the most contagious preventable disease | About That CBC News 2024-03-06
🎬Measles Explained — Vaccinate or Not? Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell 2015-02-24

List of Articles 📃

Title Publisher Date
📰A play-by-play of how measles outbreaks can spiral out of control: Canadian pediatrician calls 2024 measles death in child under 5 'devastating' CBC News 2025-03-08
📰Possible measles exposure at Pearson airport and Mississauga hospital, health officials warn: Public may have been exposed to person infected at 4 different locations, officials say CBC News 2025-03-07
📰Norfolk County is grappling with measles outbreaks, predominantly infecting unvaccinated children within religious groups that are historically mistrustful of public health The Hamilton Spectator 2025-03-07
📢Statement from the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada on the Increase in Measles Cases and the Risk to People in Canada: Measles Cases on the Rise: Protect Yourself and Your Family 🇨🇦Public Health Agency of Canada (Government of Canada) 2025-03-06
📰North Bay confirms its 1st measles case in 30 years as Ontario numbers rise, health units urge vaccination CBC News 2025-03-06
📰Do I need a measles vaccine dose? What to know: Respiratory disease is extremely contagious, public health officials say CBC News 2025-03-05
📰Measles cases nearly double in Ontario over last 2 weeks, far surpassing last decade's total: 18 unimmunized children hospitalized as a result of recent outbreak CBC News 2025-02-28

Link to a list of credible Canadian sources 🍁.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/40252923

Fair Vote Canada on Bluesky

Germany under PR: Far-right gets 20% but is shut out by democratic parties.

USA under FPTP: Far-right takes over the GOP, erodes democracy, and works to economically weaken us for annexation.

FPTP doesn’t protect democracy—it endangers it.

#cdnpoli

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/40252119

Fair Vote Canada on Bluesky

How is this democratic?

It's time for proportional representation.

#cdnpoli #onpoli

A political infographic titled 'Ontario votes 2025' compares the popular vote and seat distribution in the Ontario election. On the left, a pie chart labeled 'How we voted (popular vote)' shows: PC (43%), Liberal (29.9%), NDP (18.6%), Green (4.8%), and Other (3.8%). On the right, a pie chart labeled 'What we got (seats)' shows: PC (64.5%), NDP (21.8%), Liberal (11.3%), Green (1.6%), and Other (0.8%). The infographic highlights the discrepancy between votes cast and seats won under the first-past-the-post system.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/40228347

The Supreme Court of Canada has struck down a Ford government law that restricted political advertising by third parties, such as unions, in the year ahead of a scheduled election campaign.

The top court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the law allowed for political parties’ ads to “drown out” those of third-party groups, infringing on citizens' right to meaningfully participate in the democratic process.

“The information available to voters in Ontario in the year before an election must include the interests, voices and views of different citizens and parties,” reads the majority decision written by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis.

 

The Supreme Court of Canada has struck down a Ford government law that restricted political advertising by third parties, such as unions, in the year ahead of a scheduled election campaign.

The top court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the law allowed for political parties’ ads to “drown out” those of third-party groups, infringing on citizens' right to meaningfully participate in the democratic process.

“The information available to voters in Ontario in the year before an election must include the interests, voices and views of different citizens and parties,” reads the majority decision written by Justice Andromache Karakatsanis.

 

Ombudsman Ontario sur Bluesky

Une jeune de 16 ans prise en charge s’est sentie ignorée après un changement de travailleurs sociaux. Avec son accord, nous avons fait part de ses inquiétudes et elle bénéficie maintenant de l'aide pour se loger, se vêtir et se nourrir. En savoir plus : ow.ly/aaw150V2fUi

view more: next ›