this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
767 points (96.8% liked)

memes

13973 readers
2435 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Animals don't belong in places that sell food. Animals don't belong in office supply stores. Animals don't belong in post offices. Animals don't belong in any business other than a vet's office or pet supply store that specifically allows them.

If you can't train your animal to be home alone long enough for you to run some errands, then you shouldn't own a pet.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are some stores, like Home Depot, Home Goods, and Michael's (in the US), that are historically pet friendly. Leashed and good manners only of course, but it's great for socializing a pet and making an employee's day with cute puppies to break up the retail monotony.

A store that explicitly states service animals only, or has no sign, is not appropriate.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

These policies work out for the business as well, especially when the store shares a plaza with a pet supply place.

People bringing their dogs to store A might see store B and want to shop there, too. If store B bans pets, that means people either have to bring their dogs home and come back (which is a pain, and people might not return at all), or leave the dogs in their car (which is dangerous or even illegal.) Smart business people don't want people leaving without shopping, and people with any sense of decency don't want dogs left in cars.

So when store B explicitly permits people to bring their pets, people can go straight there from Store A without worry. Customers are happy, dogs are happy, business people are happy, and no pets have to suffer in a locked vehicle.

[–] ceiphas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Only the allergics and phobics aren't, but who cares... /s

[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 1 day ago

Animals don’t belong in post offices

Then how do you mail the animal?

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those should be an exception, obviously. But in CA we have a big problem with service animal fraud. It's bad for people with disabilities because

  • the ones who actually need animals get undue criticism, and

  • people with severe dog allergies have elevated exposure.

I think a good solution would be if the service harnesses had a QR code that linked to a state govt website with the animal's picture.

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I've never heard of service dog fraud tbh that's silly

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Animals make your food. Shocking I know. At least they wash their hands. All my service dog does is lay under the table, and bother me if she needs to alert.

[–] aspiringproblems@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Not to be pedantic but we fall under the classification of Animals. And anywhere they allow children 5 and under I'm bringing my pet to. Children are 100 times worse than the worst behaved pet

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These rules seem arbitrary and capricious. If the dog is well-trained, the owner is able to meet its needs on the go, and nobody else is explicitly being bothered, there's no compelling reason to block it from any of these establishments.

All of the above hold true for therapy animals, for instance. This isn't about the animal being well-trained, it is about both the pet and the person to be comfortable and happy, without impinging on the comfort and happiness of others. Locking well-behaved pets out of all of the above establishments does nothing to improve your comfort or happiness. It only serves to inconvenience others.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Barring animals from places that sell food is not arbitrary and capricious, it's a safety issue.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Safety how? What exactly is happening between my dog that stays on the floor and your food?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How many people have suffered physical harm from ordering food adjacent to a service animal?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago

Am I google now?

[–] ceiphas@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

There is a difference between a pet and a service animal...