this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
1692 points (99.0% liked)

News

28284 readers
5197 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Walmart fired Dani Davis, a 6'4" cisgender woman, after a man who mistook her for transgender verbally threatened her in a women’s restroom at a Florida store.

Davis, visibly shaken, reported the March 14 incident to her immediate supervisor but was fired for not informing salaried management, allegedly creating a “security risk.”

Davis called the firing discriminatory. After viral backlash, Walmart offered to reinstate her with back pay.

Davis, a longtime employee, is uncertain about returning, citing fears of a hostile work environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 168 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Step 1) Sue Walmart. Step 2) Retire in Europe.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 109 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do step 1 before the laws change to where the guy who threatened her gets a medal of freedom instead.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's already started the onboarding process to be in Trump's cabinet

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] jabeez@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

In the House of Representin'

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do... do you think...

That a person working... at Walmart...

... has the financial resources...

... to sue Walmart?

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Theres a very good chance of finding a lawyer to work for compensation after settlement

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Morgan and Morgan is from Florida, they might be the largest firm in the world and take cases for improper firings. Usually they take their cases on the basis of you won't pay anything unless you win. I'm sure they'd love that case

And they're willing to take on big corporations - iirc they were representing Austin's mom after he was killed in the monorail accident at Magic Kingdom 17 or 18 years ago this July (damn I can't believe it's been that long). She ended up settling out of court, it was really an awful situation.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The firm that advertises themselves as "good Catholics, who had as many children as they could, beginning immediately after they got married”? Yeaaaah.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh I'm sure they aren't great people. They make most of their money off swindling insurance companies for huge settlement offers due to work/car injuries. That said, if you're trying to get a huge settlement from Walmart, they are probably a good bet though. Also I know they turned down a case years ago when my dad went to them about his mother. She had surgery where there was no cartilage left in her ankle. They decided to screw her ankle to her foot essentially making it unable to move but reduce the pain. When she was in recovery they kept forcing her to get up and walk on it and she kept saying it hurt to much. Weeks into the rehab they said she wasn't trying to put in the work. Then after a lot of arguing we finally got them to do new X-rays. Of course they found hairline fractures around the screws they placed. The insurance company/Medicaid and what not all said they wouldn't cover any rehab time after the fractures were found because that time was used up during the period they were trying to force her to walk on a botched surgery. Morgan and Morgan turned down the case, and she reverse mortgaged her house to cover the rehab time. America at its finest

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Oh wow! I'm so sorry. I wish you and your family all the best, going forward.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Agreed. The misogyny is clear, even ignoring any hint of trans issues. But, I don't know what a settlement would look like and how much effort it would be to fight WMT lawyers.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah, in a strictly financial sense, they already offered to make her whole. IANAL but I doubt this would be the million-dollar suit that I wish it were.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

That's because lawyers are generally pretty smart, and they can tell when they have a sure thing.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

For something like this you likely could find a lawyer to do this pro bono. Maybe even the ACLU would get involved.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s hard to sue for damages when they’re offering reinstatement with back pay.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Emotional Suffering, and IANAL but I'm sure there's more.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Punitive damages.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s a hard one to prove in court.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If it were easy we wouldn't need lawyers.

Edit: Yeah, no one would believe this caused emotional distress. /s

Around 8 p.m. on March 14, she wrote that she was alone in a stall in the women's restroom when she heard a man yelling.

“The voice was much louder than simply someone yelling in from the door. This man was fully IN the restroom, yelling something about” transgender women, Davis wrote.

Davis said the man yelled he was going to “beat" them and was going to “protect his wife/girlfriend from them” while his wife or girlfriend was pleading with him to stop and leave before he got into trouble.

Davis wrote she was scared and froze, not knowing if the man was going to physically attack her.

“I was the only one in there so it seemed pretty clear that he saw me enter the restroom and he assumed that I am trans because of my height,” Davis recalled. “It was terrifying and I wish no one else ever had an experience like that.”

The man eventually left, and Davis was able to leave the restroom and return to her workstation.

“My immediate supervisor came by and noticed that I was visibly shaken and emotional. After taking a few moments to calm myself down, I told her what had happened. I didn't go home since it wasn't long until my shift was done (10 p.m.),” Davis wrote. “Less than a week later, I was fired.”

The reason given for her termination was that she did not report the incident to a salaried management employee and, therefore, created a security risk.

“I took it to mean that I was the security risk because someone had mistaken me for trans,” Davis told the Washington Post.

Davis said she was devastated. Because of the anti-LGBTQ+ climate in Florida, she had been planning on leaving the state. But now, she doesn't know after losing the job.

She appealed the termination through Walmart’s internal review process but was denied. She filed for unemployment insurance but also took her story to Facebook, where it soon went viral.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Can she sure Walmart, though? It's shocking what employers can get away with. I've been wronged before, and had lawyers tell me there's little they can do.