776
Boys at her school shared AI-generated, nude images of her. She was the one expelled
(abcnews.go.com)
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
776 points (99.2% liked)
News
33723 readers
3438 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So AI images of underaged nude girls being reported to police does not warrant any form of investigation?
And AI generation vendors get a free pass for generating child porn
They absolutely should not.
That would affect the economy, and profits, which as we know are much more important than morals, so unfortunately, we must allow it.
The Trump Administration is trying to make preventing this illegal.
Easy answer, we make unflattering AI porn of Ivanka. Make it impossible for her dad to enjoy.
I fear you're underestimating his depravity.
He'll insist on being added to the text chain.
The article states that the police investigated but found nothing. The kids knew how to hide/erase the evidence.
Are we really surprised, though? Police are about as effective at digital sleuthing as they are at de-escalation.
Unless they can pull out their gun and shoot at something or someone ... or tackle someone ... they aren't very good at doing anything else.
Literally verbatim what an officer said when we couldn't get a hold of animal control and he got sent over instead...
You should have kept reading.
"Ultimately, the weeks-long investigation at the school in Thibodaux, about 45 miles (72 kilometers) southwest of New Orleans, uncovered AI-generated nude images of eight female middle school students and two adults, the district and sheriff’s office said in a joint statement.”
The article later states that they continued investigating, and found ten people (eight girls and two adults) who were targeted with multiple images. They charged two boys with creating and distributing the images.
It’s easy to jump on the ACAB bandwagon, but real in-depth investigation takes time. Time for things like court subpoenas and warrants, to compel companies like Snapchat to turn over message and image histories (which they do save, contrary to popular belief). The school stopped investigating once they discovered the kids were using Snapchat (which automatically hides message history) but police continued investigating and got ahold of the offending messages and images.
That being said, only charging the two kids isn’t really enough. They should charge every kid who received the images and forwarded them. Receiving the images by itself shouldn’t be punished, because you can’t control what other people spontaneously send you… But if they forwarded the images to others, they distributed child porn.
Oh, shit! Did they shoot the computer?
collapsed inline media
No it doesn't say that.
Your question was answered in the article but you clearly stopped at either the outrage bait headline or the outrage bait summary.
"Ultimately, the weeks-long investigation at the school in Thibodaux, about 45 miles (72 kilometers) southwest of New Orleans, uncovered AI-generated nude images of eight female middle school students and two adults, the district and sheriff's office said in a joint statement."
That was the investigation by the police not the school.
What we're asking is why the school didn't investigate given that the police had already been contacted.
I mean, the police are the proper individuals to be investigating csam. The school bringing them in immediately would have been the correct action. School officials aren't trained to investigate crime.
Perhaps the cops are the proper investigative arm, but the school system had an obligation to assist in that investigation, and not ignore it, then deny it, then cover it up.
The entire leadership of the school should be fired, and the principal should be prosecuted.
Agreed
Because a school can't compell Snapchat to release "disappeared" images and chat logs. So perhaps in this case it was best left to the police.
It wasn't left to the police she'd already gone to the police. It sounds from the story like the school did literally nothing at all.
Also you don't need to compel Snapchat to release the images they're 13-year-old boys they absolutely have permanent copies on their phones.
How can the school compel the boys to show the permanent copies then? I think you are overestimating the power of the school in this scenario.
Saying there is nothing they can do is the standard cop-out for lazy administrators.
They are minors in school, under the legal supervision of the school. There are LOTS of things a school can do, and courts have been finding mostly on the side of schools for decades.
Without even trying, I can think of a dozen things the school could have done, including banning phones from the suspects until the investigation is over.
But they chose to do nothing, them punish the victim when she defended herself, after the school refused.
Banning phones during the investigation does not give the administration evidence to work with. Even if they took the phones, the school still couldn’t force the students to unlock them. The only way to get the evidence needed was through the police.
Okay, then permanent expulsion.
Which you need evidence to do. Evidence the school could not get.
These commenters just want to be outraged. If schools were suddenly confiscating phones and forcing students to unlock them they'd be on here rabble rousing about First Amendment rights, how Schools are run like prisons, and how students aren't being respected.
You should know that the person you are going back and forth with has an exceptionally argumentative and unpleasant comment history.
I know, I like to argue too. At least I did until I was banned from .ml for hurting their feelings.
The school doesn't even need to do that to effectively squash suspected behavior in the short term.
Maybe they can't dole out a substantive punishment, but when I was growing up they absolutely would lean on kids for even being suspected of doing something, or even if they hadn't done it yet, but the administration could see it coming. Sure they might of wasted some time on kids that truly weren't up to anything, but there generally weren't actual punishments of consequence on those cases. I'm pretty sure that a few things were prevented entirely, just by the kids being told that the administration sees it coming.
So they should have at least been able to effectively suppress the student body behavior while they worked out the truth.
What? RTFA. 2 boys were charged by the Sheriff's department. They didn't face any punishment from the school, but law enforcement definitely investigated.
Must be a majority republican police department.
It's Louisiana, what do you think?
I think you may have read the wrong article.
No! Are you trying to get the perpetrator hired into Trump's cabinet?!
I mean, law enforcement doesn't have enough resources to go after people making real CP.
What makes you think they can go after everyone making fake CP with AI?
They do have resources, especially in the US. They do go after real cp and people go to jail on a near daily basis for it.
This too, could have been investigated better, which is kind of the point of the article
Why are you so okay with child pornography? Checking your message history really shows you being completely fine with CP, yet you really have it out for the victim
Correct. They will not investigate it further than threatening the victims with persecution. The goal is that the victim doesn't pursue it further.
They don't know how to properly investigate it, and they are not interested in knowing. The see it as both 'kids being kids' and 'if this gets out it will give our town a bad name'.
I'm glad the kid and her family aren't letting this go!
Read.The.Whole.Article.
Yes, after the kid had to take matters into her own hands.
She asked for help. The officer said no. She didn't let it go/escalated the issue as the sexual harassment progressed. Only when forced did they investigate
No they didn't and if they did that information is not in this article. She went to the Guidance Councilor at 7AM then to the onsite Sheriff's Deputy after. She texted her father and sister about 2PM. The SD couldn't immediately find anything but it appears that they didn't stop looking because 3 weeks later they were charging the boys.
So unless you have another source with a different timeline or more information your originally comment was inaccurate. Sort of like the ragebait headline and the ragebait summary.
You're simping hard for the police in here. There is no proof that any of the charges would have occurred had people not become outrage. The school definitely need this pressure.
You have a lot of cops in your family because I can't think of a reason anyone would be such a massive cheerleader for professional thugs without some personaon relationship.