this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
1218 points (98.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36087 readers
5129 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Food has ceremonial and ritual value in all of those places, it is not merely a vehicle for nutrition.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, I never said it doesn't. Just that it is not a centerpiece of the culture. The fact that Americans have a big Thanksgiving dinner once a year isn't comparable to the approach that the French/Italian/Greek/most Asian cultures have towards food on a daily basis

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, at the risk of being pedantic, you literally said:

food is just nutrition

I understand now what you intended to communicate (which is strictly different than what you said)

I got excited when I read what you said, because i thought you actually had an example of a culture for whom food is just nutrition. It's a sci-fi trope that i find interesting because it is truly alien, and I've always wondered if any real culture fit that.

Even in puritan cultures that intentionally eat plain food to shun "hedonism", food becomes a vehicle for virtue signaling. The suffering is a ritual practice. Food, even then, plays a critical cultural role.

I understand what you mean now. I'm just disappointed.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is for like 350 days a year yeah. Eating take out food in front of the TV/PC doesn't count? There's someone else sharing their experience of Brits just "eating" those liquid protein shakes every day, that seems pretty close too. Of course, cultures are not homogeneous, and you can find Italians that drink protein shakes and Norwegians that are really into cooking high-quality ingredients for others. I'm not sure if you were picturing a country where everyone eats pills or what

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I was picturing a culture for whom food was strictly for nutrition.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even in puritan cultures that intentionally eat plain food to shun "hedonism", food becomes a vehicle for virtue signaling. The suffering is a ritual practice. Food, even then, plays a critical cultural role.

Yeah, but one can view that cultural tradition and conclude that their culture does not value the deliciousness of food as much as some other cultures.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if agree with your conclusion. You might conclude that they put great value on the deliciousness of thier food, but the relationship is inverse: less delicious = greater value.

People of of two cultures might both place high value on decorations, but one culture might view another's style as tacky.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But you described it as "suffering." The subjective experience of a person in that culture is that the food is less pleasant to consume.

In other words, the enjoyment of the food is actively discouraged, in favor of another criterion (the suffering that comes from eating it). So we can point out that the culture does not prioritize the enjoyment of food as much, and can stand by that particular metric as having directionality on that spectrum.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think we agree in principle.

I think if one conceptualize "deliciousness" as a "property that induces joy" and "not deliciousness" as a "property that induces suffering" as being distinct measures, then it makes sense to conceptualize puritan values as saying they don't value "deliciousness".

If you conceptualize "deliciousness" as having a negative axis, then Puritains DO value deliciousness, but along the negative axis, which is irregular and noteworthy, but still valuing deliciousness.

Same goes for suffering vs enjoyment. If you consider them independent vs as it being one measure with negative values.

I'm considering them as the same but with a negative axis. I feel like that's where the gap is. I think ultimately we're in agreement.