this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
345 points (86.3% liked)

memes

18466 readers
2660 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 41 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Both aren't really private. Both is a for-profit company claiming it to be private.

[–] IDew@feddit.nl 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

No. Proton is a for profit company whose largest shareholder is a non profit foundation. As is written right in your linked post. The foundation is not the company.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

Somebody get this user some lemmy silver.

[–] IDew@feddit.nl 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Oh. Didn't know lol. I just saw Proton blabla non-profit blabla and jumped to a conclusion too fast like I always do 🥴

You read something. Big points for real.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 4 points 15 hours ago

Which isn't a bad thing, actually. Being a non-profit can make it hard to expand in some cases, but what makes for-profit companies shit is the shareholders calling for the upward going line, which isn't the motivator of the shareholder here.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

For-profit company and private are not mutually exclusive though. Mullvad VPN for example is ~~as much~~ a for-profit company ~~as~~ unlike proton which is nonprofit, and arguably also one of the most private VPN services available.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 20 hours ago

Even if you were correct in saying Proton is for profit, "for-profit" and "private" are not mutually exclusive.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Proton is not a for profit.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

False. The Proton Foundation is a Swiss non-profit and does not have shareholders.

[–] greenacres3233@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Proton was created to serve the world, and the non-profit Proton Foundation ensures that this can never change. As Proton’s primary shareholder, the foundation exercises its control to ensure that Proton does not deviate from our mission to build a better internet that serves the interests of all of society.

Edit: meaning, there's a difference between the foundation and the company