this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
1204 points (95.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44477 readers
1815 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"garbage account"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (6 children)

AI doesn't exist. This is like asking an atheist why they hate god.

If you're talking about LLMs and the like, they're unpopular on Lemmy because tech people are over represented here and tech people understand how these technologies work and why all the hype isn't just false, but malicious.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean a bunch of advertising and media companies that control and gatekeep the news are hyping something that's making them trillions of dollars? That seems... so unbelievable!

[–] waxy@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

Isn't the "AI" boom making very little for the companies hawking it and making trillions for the hardware providers? I feel like it's analogous to the people that sold shovels & pickaxes during the gold rush.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Today my boss asked me why Gemini suggested made up columns when he was trying to query our database. I just told him it also makes up fake tables.

This shit is half baked and really never should have been foisted on the public.

[–] msage@programming.dev 6 points 17 hours ago

This shit has cost the investors untold money, and it was promised to revolutionize the world, so by golly it will, by force if it must.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

if ai doesn't exist then who is playing against me when i set the other civilizations to ai in rise of nations

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, that's me. Microsoft gave me backdoor access to your computer so I can play against you.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 7 points 22 hours ago

using linux doesn't protect me when i still run microsoft games on it i guess. it's poetic in a way.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I know you're meming, but in Civilization (as in most games), you're playing against predefined scripts and algorithmic rules that the computer opponent has, as well as having cheaper costs for resources than the user at higher difficulty levels - because it cannot compete with a skilled human player at that level (it literally cheats).

No LLM, no neural network, no deep learning.. not 'AI' in the modern sense that's being discussed here.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's not predefined though. The rules of the game are but not its actions. It observes the environment and changes its behavior based on that. That's narrow intelligence and thus meeting the criteria of AI.

A chess player isn't not-intelligent either just because it's bound by the rules of the game.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It is absolutely predefined - if you make the same moves it will give you the same results, every time. Same as playing ChessMaster 2000 from 1986.

It may narrowly fit into the broad definition of 'AI' (like, since the 70s) but that's not what's being discussed in this thread.

Believe what you like though.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's not predefined - chess has about 10^120 possible games. That's astronomically large number which is way too vast to pre-store or hardcode. It's intelligence through computation, not a script.

Believe what you like though.

"Script" in a computer programming sense. An algorithm. So general behavior is most likely predefined. So not a script in a sense that it always does the same thing. This just means its behavior is most likely described using "if" statements. Eg. "If oponent did this, respond with that..." Algorithm can also "remember" some actions and act based on that. However the AI is most probably not activeley learning from your actions. It has all the knowledge predefined.

Some more advanced algorithms utilize some self learning principles. Buy this is very rare in games since this is resource intensive.

But even machine learning is not AI. Even LLM is not AI. But at least LLM became a synonym for AI in recent years.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 11 points 17 hours ago

AI has existed for decades. The chessbot on Atari is an AI.

What doesn't exist is AGI but that's not synonymous with AI. Most people just don't know the right terms here and bunch it all together as if it was all one thing.

If one is expecting a large language model designed to generate natural sounding language to be generally intelligent like an sci-fi AI assistant then no wonder they find it lacking. They're expecting autonomous driving from a cruise control.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's not only tech people who "hate" AI.


signed, half a tech person

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Also not a tech person, but I am an artist. I used to consider going into digital art, but now I'm grateful I didn't and instead have honed ... I guess you can call it "manual" art? As a way to say things I make with my hands? Maybe "analog" or "traditional" art?

Point is, I haven't seen an AI create a pencil drawing or an acrylic painting. I get the feeling that as people tire of AI generated images, they may find renewed interest in these distinctly human-made art forms. I suppose we'll have to wait and see. For now, AI may try to steal forms and ideas, but picking up a pencil or a paintbrush and creating something on a canvas are still out of its reach (thank goodness.)

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If artificial intelligence doesn't exist explain Reddit.

Check mate Atheist.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

No sign of intelligence there.

Game, set and match... believer?