this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
124 points (96.3% liked)

News

33393 readers
2492 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/kSLC2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I have a batter idea because too many Americans are anti tax but also hate fiat.

We erase the wealth instead. Take their investments and just delete them from financial records. It's fiat so it's imaginary and we can choose to stop imagining it.

Think of all the economic theories that will be tested!

No need to worry about what to do with anything collected. No corrupt middle men to skim off a price of it. Not written off, not a tax event, just poof gone.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's not a good idea, mainly because how billionaires' wealth works - it's not in cash but split between various investments, including real estate and other property. Do you suggest we just burn their supercars, their villas, their stocks, their Rolexes?

It's not a bank account you can set to 0. What they have as available cash is at most 10% of their wealth, but usually under 1%, since cash is riskier than other investments.

Hell, the reason we're having trouble taxing the rich is because they use weird loopholes that aren't available to anyone else - such as taking low interest large lump sum loans backed by their assets/investments, which is tax-free, then defaulting on said loan or writing it off, transferring the backing asset to the loan giver, also tax free... Meanwhile you or me? We're stuck with cashing out our investments which is an immediately taxable event. Good luck convincing a bank to give you a 0.25% loan of £5000 against your £6000 investment portfolio.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Burn it all to the fucking ground.

I'm am tired of the argument that we really isn't want their shit. I don't. Destroy it all. Stock, delete it. Over shore accounts, balance is now zero.

I am no longer interesting in a wealth tax. That was the proposal over a decade ago. I presume they've now had enough time to paid someone to structure against it.

All their physical property becomes problematic anyway. I dont want to see some bastard cop trying around in a super car. I don't want some other asshole to move into their mansions. Knock it down and build tiny houses for the homeless.

At least the robber barron's gave use ornate theatres, museums and colleges. These ghouls have given us nothing but pain and misery.

Guillotines have become a campy meme so let's bring back public pyres instead. I'm a reasonable person, so I say leave it up to every employee and customer they've had as to if the person needs to be tied to the top of their pyre.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 2 hours ago

You "delete" or burn all that wealth, and you kill the poorest 50% of the planet practically overnight.

Sorry but burning just the wealth down without taking the system with it would result in chaos that would only hurt the most exposed. That's why taxing the wealth is the right idea, with further steps taken to ensure such wealth discrepancy cannot exist in the future.