this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
830 points (92.2% liked)

memes

18220 readers
2852 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

No, I just haven't seen any evidence red light cameras are effective.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/red-light-cameras-may-not-make-streets-safer/

Also I don't like everything being under camera surveillance, so I need a strong justification to be fine with more of it

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Red light cameras may not be effective at making streets safer. But, they're nearly 100% effective at making people who run red lights pay fines. The first one would be amazing, but I'm happy to settle for the second one.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You sound like someone who can likes rich people getting away with just paying fines for being rich assholes

[–] urandom@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is not the cameras then, but the fines. Should be proportional to net worth

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

we both know thatll never happen in america, and until then its a law for poors only, as designed. Its continued existence only affects poor people

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Cameras specifically to catch people running red-lights will only take a photo when a car crosses a red light rather than run continuously.

They'll only have you "under surveillance" if and when you're breaking the law by running a red light.

So if you're so worried about "surveillance" from those cameras, don't run red-lights.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There are other, newer cameras like those from Flock that run and check continuously. I prefer the old-school ones you're talking about.

[–] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, the old ones are fine, but they're just turning into mass surveillance tools now