this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
391 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
3098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As of this week, half of the states in the U.S. are under restrictive age verification laws that require adults to hand over their biometric and personal identification to access legal porn.

Missouri became the 25th state to enact its own age verification law on Sunday. As it’s done in multiple other states, Pornhub and its network of sister sites—some of the largest adult content platforms in the world—pulled service in Missouri, replacing their homepages with a video of performer Cherie DeVille speaking about the privacy risks and chilling effects of age verification.

Archive: http://archive.today/uZB13

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 73 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

I mean, a VPN is way cheaper than whatever hoops Idaho wants you to jump through to watch some 10/10 goth hottie get their ass eaten.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 50 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Yea, but soon we’ll have no states to vpn to, and we will have to start using the Quebec servers, then all the websites will be in French and I’ll have to learn a new language.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I VPN to Montreal servers. Everything is still displayed in English.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago

Your response is also supposed to be legally in French.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 6 points 6 hours ago

... and then all that will be left will be .onion sites

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

soon we’ll have no states to vpn to

I've yet to see any state legislature take that proposal seriously. Unlike trying to make porn sites take your credit card info in advance (a policy they hated so much gosh darn it!) you're really fucking with the money when you try and regulate VPNs. Also, just... not really that practical. For the same reason Congress has been pretty toothless when it comes to regulating Torrents and digital encryption, going after VPNs at the regulatory level is something of a technological rabbit hole.

then all the websites will be in French

Nothing will ever make anyone on the internet learn a language other than English.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve yet to see any state legislature take that proposal seriously

snekerpimp meant if every state requires ID, then VPN to another state will not get around the ID check.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Setting aside the fact that there's no appetite for these laws in liberal states because its purely a conservative fetish, you can still get porn on the internet without going to the big corporate online clearinghouses.

FFS, there was porn on Napster back in the day.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's no appetite for these laws in the voter public of any state, as far as I can tell given how VPN usage skyrockets in every state where these laws are put in place. Is California no longer liberal? Also consider the people running sites in any of the states that have such a law. They may resort to just blanket ID-checking everyone rather than risk prosecution.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

There’s no appetite for these laws in the voter public of any state

Evangelical right-wing states have a huge contingent of politicians who compete with one another to be the toughest on "child sex trafficking" and other Epstein-tangential topics. So, in the GOP primary, you get a lot of promises about how you're going to round up all the pedos and put them to the sword or whatever. And this inevitably manifests as "please insert your dick into this pepper grinder to access the pornography" laws, as a sort-of practical compromise.

Is California no longer liberal?

Current Status: Failed (2024-08-15: In committee: Held under submission.)

Looks like they're retaining their title. That said, if you peak under the "Supporters and Opponents" what you're going to see in the Supporters section is a litany of right-wing evangelical organizations and a couple of mega-corps.

They may resort to just blanket ID-checking everyone rather than risk prosecution.

The current strategy appears to be refusing to host content in the regulated states. Even then, there are plenty of social media and general content distribution channels that dodge the regulation by claiming to be content-blind in how they serve their data. I don't see Facebook or YouTube getting the business end of any of these regulations. Almost as though they're toothless if you've got enough money to tip your Congresscritters.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Napster was audio only. Did you mean limewire, or kazaa, or one of the many napster clones that came after?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Is there a French version of /c/ich_iel?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I can only assume it would be something like !moi_evv if it existed.

[–] root@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

States are also considering banning VPNs now as well. This will never work and is a horrible idea, but it’s being considered.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

States are also considering banning VPNs now as well.

Well, some legislators have proposed taking wack-a-mole to the next level and demanding all VPNs be certified and regulated. But good luck getting that passed through the Silicon Valley Presidency or the Ancap Courts.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I would count on them being hypocritical. The rich will just use Starlink.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago

StarLink connections still exit on the ground, sometimes in a different state. You could gain access or get denied pron based on where your ground IP ends up.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

Yeah then Elon can blackmail them instead of someone else