Lemmy Shitpost
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
view the rest of the comments
Same for the other side. All the countless times where God miraculously saves the plane in the last moment lost to history. No news report, no one will check the black box. It's just another Tuesday
Surely if it was a miracle there'd be some supernatural residue left over. Holy ectoplasm.
The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence
Isnt it though? If i say i own a car but never carry car keys, my home has no garage or on-street parking spot, that is evidence that i dont own a car.
There are also the records in countries that have vehicle registration...
There's a complete absence of evidence for everything you can just make up.
I claim that the universe was created by Ralph the Wonderllama who lives on Proxima Centauri B and who owns all albums by Simply Red.
But hey, no evidence of absence, right? So my claim is valid, right? And you suddenly don't care how unlikely it is, right?
And I respect that belief
Yeah but respect isn't proof, and you're the one that made the assertion requiring evidence here...
And I respect that you are critical of what I said! We need critics to grow. A critical mind is a gift of God
Oh, you're trolling. Alright, fair enough. I gotta ask though, why troll in defense of the christians? They're doing more than enough to destroy society without your helping out on their behalf by sowing nonsense like this.
Wow thats deep
(dunno if you're being sarcastic)
It's just a twee catchphrase christians came up with to say you can't prove a negative. It's not anything new, and it's not actually contributing anything. It's a core aspect of "burden of proof", and this is just a way of shifting said burden to the people asking for evidence of the divine instead of leaving it on the people asserting that the divine exists in the first place.
Thanks.
Yes, but absence of evidence isn't evidence for anything.
It's wild how many need to find them some scientific method.
I was only pointing out, in my original comment, that I'm sure around the world people pray/say all sorts of things when a plane is crashing, not just the Christian god. But because they're only focusing on crashes in the US, they are concluding that everyone prays to god (presumably, the Christian one).
why is this being downvoted
It's because they missed the point of my comment. That it's selection bias to claim that everyone is praying to the Christian god, when statistically, that can't be true, even if they are praying.
The selection bias had nothing to do with selecting the planes that crashed, but selecting planes that crashed in the US, which is a much more Christian country than many other places.
That said, OOP's argument wasn't that their god is real but that deep down, everyone is religious. Still they made it into a truth claim about their religion. The commenter took the truth claim and ran with it.
I thought about putting "/s" in my first comment but it didn't feel quite right. It was more a thought experiment. Applying selection bias to the reply. It was only the second comment when I entered troll mode.
Insert inception bwwwwaoww
Because there is no magic sky magician letting kids die a gruesome leukemia death, while saving a specific plane because a special favorite person of his happens to be on board the aircraft. There's just physics and mechanics and pilots and things going right and things going wrong.
The comment is obviously sarcasm / a joke
Making the sarcastic statement that "we don't hear about god saving planes at the last moment but it does happen"
That person has gone on to repeatedly double down on the position elsewhere in the comments, I'm afraid to say the hivemind was right on this one and they sure appear to be a whackdoodle that actually believes what they said there.
Because of Poe's Law. Sometimes I try to make my intentions obvious but sometimes I just don't care
Did you mean Poe's Law? That would imply you only made the claim about divine selection bias sarcastically, and we all just thought you were being serious.
I meant what I said and I said Poe's Law. I don't understand your question.
And I didn't mean that god selects. I meant that we only talk about those who crash. It was a thought experiment
A sarcastic thought experiment, then?