this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
882 points (99.4% liked)

News

28075 readers
3180 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth denied allegations that he texted classified war plans to a Signal group chat that mistakenly included The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg.

The National Security Council confirmed the chat’s authenticity but called the inclusion of Goldberg an inadvertent mistake.

Lawmakers from both parties demanded investigations, with former CIA Director Leon Panetta warning of potential espionage violations.

Hegseth dismissed Goldberg as a "deceitful" journalist. Trump denied knowledge of the incident.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corroded@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Even if everyone in the chat had a need-to-know, you do not use insecure 3rd-party software for classified communications. Secure networks already exist for this.

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not to mention why they are using it in the first place... so they can't be FOIA'd

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Doesn't protect from FOIA, if you use your phone for official communication and it stores records, your phone can be FOIA'd.

[–] TechAnon@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Isn't the issue that Signal messages aren't stored on the phone and can be set to auto delete after some time? So there's no tracking of official federal business? Or am I thinking about this the wrong way?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Signal messages ARE stored on the phone. They're briefly stored on the signal servers with end to end encryption as well until they are transmitted to all the recipients, at which point signal deletes them from their server. And yes they can be auto-deleted.

Once they are on the phone though, all the encryption benefits are up to the user.

Did they password protect signal? Is their phone itself encrypted at rest? How long after the phone is unlocked and signal opened do the messages remain unencrypted where malware could then access them? How long does the phone remain unlocked once the password is entered but the screen is turned off? Are they even using secure passwords on phones or simple 4 digit pins?

[–] TechAnon@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I see - thank you. If they delete the messages from their phone there would be no tracking of official government business, right? Also, Gabbard wouldn't disclose if she used a personal phone for this Signal chat or not which is troublesome.

Correct, there's no tracking if deleted from the phones which would be a violation.

I don't know, but I imagine the mere fact that it could be deleted with no trace would be a violation of itself.

No you're absolutely right and the fact that this is apparently common practice in the admin is revelatory.

[–] homura1650@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Legally yes. Practically, the people handling the FOIA request do not know about it and do not have access to it, so they will not look at it when responding to a FOIA request. Also practically, if you submit a FOIA request for operational details of military action, the response will be no, and every judge you stand before to challenge that no will side with the government.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

According to the original article, the messages were set to auto delete after a max of 4 weeks :)

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think Signal is getting tarred unfairly here. The thing that made that channel insecure was their ineptitude, not verifying who was in the group.

They gave a journalist the encryption key to their secure channel.

There's other, record keeping related, concerns with them using signal for communicating, but I don't think the security of Signal is being called into question when used properly.

[–] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

Correct. Signal is still an excellent app. The problem is that it can have a wide array of contacts that can be added by the slip of a thumb (aka User Error). I’d imagine that secure government software does not happen to have the editors in chief of major news publications saved on there. They probably also have a flag coded in there that alerts you if someone without proper security clearance is added by mistake.