this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
932 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

76917 readers
3144 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"I see you are dual booting with Linux? I've reformatted that partition for you."

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I had this happen before but not in recent times. Not sure if others have experienced the same.

For a while I had my bootloader on a single drive but I now have my Linux bootloader on /dev/sda and my windows on /dev/sdb and toggle it in the bios when I need to use Windows. I haven't had Windows overwrite anything in a long time. Could be a coincidence though.

It’s mostly an issue when you have them sharing boot drives via partitions. If you keep them isolated to their own separate drives, Windows doesn’t tend to muck with things. It’s because Windows is bad about killing bootloaders, and automatically setting itself as the default in the boot order. So if you have it sharing a drive, it’ll nuke your boot. But if you don’t have them sharing a drive, and boot via a loader on the Linux drive, there is no boot loader on the Windows drive to nuke.

[–] vimmiewimmie@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

I've read that dual booting Windows and Linux can have temperamental quirks and I've had my share of them.

Now, if I'm doing that, Windows fs gets isolated and I refuse to even connect it to the internet. But, outside of a legacy automotive shop program meant for XP, I've not needed Windows for a couple years.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

One of the reasons why I never dual boot. Unfucking GRUB is not on my priority lists.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Only dualboot with windows on a separate drive, that hasn't given me any issues in the past 5 years or so

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 12 hours ago

Just make sure to unplug all non-Windows drives when installing Windows. Otherwise it can do weird things like making unilateral decisions on which exact drive it shoves its bootloader on. I've wiped my Linux drive when changing to another distro aaaaand the Windows bootloader was gone too. It really shouldn't have been.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Same here. I have Windows 10 on a separate physical disk (sdb). I have Linux and GRUB on sda, so Windows has no idea that it's not the only OS on my computer.