this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
913 points (96.6% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

516 readers
1366 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

Time to break free of traditional political ideological labeling and divisions. Time to abandon old, divisive sociopolitical labels like "liberal" and "conservative".

A new political party based on a vastly, commonly held virtures lends itself to embrace over 66% of Americans, and it clearly embraces progressive principled thinking. In the most ideal American sense of unity, a political party should not be able to be defined or placed as "to the left" or "to the right" of where the Democratic or Republican parties currently are. Just let it exist organically based on present-day principled thinking. The American Progressive Majority.


Originally Posted By u/Atlanticbboy At 2025-03-23 04:38:18 AM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is by design, the US election system was built to prevent "tyranny of the majority". Which makes sense in theory, but it would make more sense if it was also backed by a government structure like a parliamentary republic with proportional representation instead of a presidential republic.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Can you elaborate? Tyrany of the majority is as such democracy, if you have an opposing opinion

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

The US is a federation. Each state is like a separate country in many regards. And small states don't want to end up submitting to things a majority of their population doesn't agree with because bigger states end up skewing the overall majority. So states' voting power is not directly proportional to their population, which supposedly evens the playing field.

Think of the US as something like the EU, not like a single European country. You could say 60% of Europeans agree on some subject, so it should be the law in Europe, but that 60% overall could be 90% in France, Germany and Italy, but 10% in Lithuania and Cyprus. So why would those latter countries accept such a law?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

Tyrany of the majority is as such democracy,

Democracy is not "majority rules". Democracy is "Government by consent of the governed". You're describing "populism", not "democracy".

"Populism" is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. "Democracy" is every measure the sheep has to keep themselves of the ballot.

The wolves will take their populist position and complain about "minority rule", but the principles of Democracy dictate that the sheep must not be subjected to their popular whim.