this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
661 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

9564 readers
2500 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 58 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can I get some data on the "most people are good" bit?

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

When it comes to people you meet each day (friends, colleagues, schoolmates, ...), are there people among them you'd call 'genuinely evil'? Is it a majority of them?

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Daily reminder that 30% of people would vote to bring back chattel slavery if it was convenient.

[–] LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 18 hours ago

Yes, but only for foreigners and non whites. Who don't matter obviously

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago (38 children)

Honestly? Yeah, it's well over a majority. I wouldn't call them 'purely evil', but 'genuinely evil' is pretty much the norm in society. People just tend to compartmentalize their evil.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I feel like this is projection. How tf do you know "well over a majority" of people are compartmentalizing "evil", in a way so good that we can't detect it, but somehow you know this to be true and we should trust you? Why? How? What makes you special in knowing this? I'm sorry if I'm coming off rude, I just don't understand how people can say this with such confidence when they haven't asked "well over a majority" of humans. 😛

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In 2024 35% of eligible voters didn't vote and 32% voted for Trump. That's not a perfect measure, but it's about as much of a case as can be made. I'm also far less inclined to move any of those 67% over to the "good" side than to move any of the 32% that voted for Harris to the bad side.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I'm sure each of those people think they're doing good though, rather than purposely "compartmentalizing evil."

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

In my personal experience, 95+% of people are, at the end of the day, pretty selfish. I don’t mean that they need to be saints, but almost everyone does not want to make small sacrifices to make the world a better place.

I’m talking about people that don’t want to eat less meat or try to consume less, or maybe just give the benefit of the doubt to the other side.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Doesn't make them evil though, just human. The human brain is wired not to make life worse for its host, or its offspring.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Yes and yes, unfortunately.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

I reject the premise. The term "Evil" is meaningless.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Here's my counter: most people are idiots

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

That doesn't make them good. Being stupid is a rather limited excuse in the face of such great evils we have today.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

@the_q@lemmy.zip @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone
@politicalmemes@lemmy.world

I can't help but recall of two quotes: one from Rousseau who said "Humans are born good but society corrupts them", and another from Hobbes who said "Humans are a wolf to humans". While it seems like both thinkers couldn't agree with each other because both statements look different, the logical implications from Rousseau inevitably leads to that of Hobbes. I'll try to explain my point below.

When Rousseau says "society corrupts good humans", he implies the existence of not-good humans because, as we know, society is made out of people (not just Soylent Green). Rousseau implies that the not-good humans were once good until they got corrupted by earlier not-good humans, which were corrupted by even earlier not-good humans... somewhere, non-goodness was born. Causality requires that a non-goodness stemmed from some kind of "patient zero of evilness".

Now, religions would be tempted to think of this "patient zero" as something supernatural: Shaitan, Iblis, Angra Mainyu... It's not exactly wrong (as archetypal representation), but it's not accurate either: it's not something too otherworldly, it's right in front of us or, should I say, inside us.

Take Derren Brown's "The Push" (a documentary about social compliance and conformity): before the auction gala where (spoiler)the person was cluelessly played by a hidden script to push someone from a rooftop, commiting murder to (in their mind) save themself(/spoiler), Derren conducted a "selection process" where the candidates would answer a test: unbeknownst to them, the test was beyond a questionnaire, it was evaluating who would keep standing up and sitting whenever a bell rang. They weren't told to do so: they were, instead, socially pressured to do it, because all the other candidates were doing it. It's the "monkey see, monkey do".

Those who didn't watch The Push (watch it, it's illuminating) might ask: if the candidates weren't told to do it (switch between sitting and standing whenever a bell rings), how did the behavior emerge? The behavior was initially seeded by actors, people who initially acted on it. Then things got funnier: one by one, actors were removed and fresh, clueless candidates were added, until no actors were in the room, yet the behavior continued. It was carried among "generations" (batches of candidates).

There was no devil behind this behavior. One could argue "Derren Brown was the devil behind the scenes, conducting a social experiment", but something motivated those actors (e.g. money), just like something motivated the hypothetical "first evil human" to be evil, except... something also motivated clueless candidates to imitate it, just like something motivated the "Rousseau's good humans" to spread societal corruption.

It's not a devil: it's humans, it's us. We're born with this wolf inside, and it just takes a "push" for it to howl. It's inherent to us because it's inherent to Nature.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Humans are situational. That's what makes them interesting and worthwhile. Anything that is the same in every situation has no heart.

I tend to think that you really see what people are made of in a tight spot. In a nice situation, everyone finds it easy to be kind. But even those who rise to a challenge and show true heart only do so when they really believe it is an option. That is the point of having hope.