this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
689 points (98.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

34161 readers
3425 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Adaptive cruise control FTW. Matches speed with the person ahead of me (up to the max that I set) and maintains a gap that I can specify. It starts slowing down long before I'd notice the gap closing if I were doing it myself, so the +/- acceleration is a lot smoother as a result.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, I don't know exactly how the adaptive cruise control works. But if it is slowing down and speeding up to maintain a specific distance, that does not fix things. The idea is to maintain a specific speed such that, as the people in front of you accelerate and brake, speed up and slow down, you have enough distance to not have to do that. You should essentially match their average speed with enough gap that their braking doesn't put them close enough to your bumper that you have to slow down yourself. Normal cruise control would be better (except mine won't set at speeds under, I think, 20mph) because your speed wont change. Adaptive cruise would make your drive safer, maybe, keeping you from being too close or failing to react to the change in traffic speeds, but I dont think it would solve the traffic issue itself.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You aren't solving traffic as an individual driver anyway. Sorry to burst everyone's atomized bubble here but that's complete nonsense.

If you manually maintain a large gap in front of you, everyone behind you becomes complete weirdos.

We could "solve traffic" by not requiring single occupant car drives to accomplish everything in our daily lives.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You’re quite literally incorrect and talking out of your ass

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You're right of course, the reason traffic exists is because you, DancingBear, cannot be on every roadway in America at the same time.

Seriously dude, have you ever been in traffic? I'm not talking about a small slowdown on a one, two lane, or even four lane road. I'm talking about sitting on the 5 or the 101 in any of the multiple times it becomes a parking lot daily.

Manually maintaining a large gap in front of you is not solving that shit, and it's frankly ridiculous to suggest that it will.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Keep beating your straw man I guess

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Do you also believe that only you can prevent forest fires? Or that we can recycle our way out of climate change?

Get real. Uncoordinated individual actions cannot solve systemic problems.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 7 hours ago

In the case of traffic, keeping a larger following distance can quite literally solve the stop and go break waves that occur…

Trying to race ahead and get ahead by one car at a time makes the problem worse.

That’s all this is saying.

You can not solve the problem ahead of you, you can only affect the traffic behind you.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's not "locked" to a specific distance, it's fairly elastic and the exact follow distance varies based on speed. So, if traffic slows down, it will gradually close the gap while also slowing down. The end result then is far less drastic speed changes.