this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16643 readers
118 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Teflon itself is quite good, getting it to stick to places is the problem.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In Denmark there was until very recently a factory doing something with teflon. That shit got launched out the chimney and just rained down everywhere.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FlordaMan@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, Dupont invoiced everyone.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 3 weeks ago

monsanto tactics

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, every factory that does "something" with Teflon probably wants to stick it to things, which are the problematic chemicals, not Teflon itself.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Quite good, if you avoid the fact it's literally everywhere including the atmosphere, doesn't break down, and causes cancer. But who cares about such little things like cancer causing rain...

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Again, that's from getting it to stick to things. The smaller PTFE chemicals that make it possible to suspend Teflon in water are the problem.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago

It's releasing a high amount of micro and nano plastics, and those are linked to different health issues including cancer.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724027232

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

It's also what makes it cheap. Making Teflon other ways is much more expensive.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Teflon is the brand name for for the chemical Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Making PTFE requires PFAS, which are the toxic part. Think of PFAS as little bits of chain varying lengths that get strung together to make the larger PTFE molecule.

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous." PFAS contaminated water being released to the environment is an unavoidable by produce of making Teflon. You can only make Teflon as a solid without suspending the PFAS in water first.

Here's a pretty good video about the history, manufacturing process, and toxicity.

https://youtu.be/SC2eSujzrUY

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous."

I didn't read it that way at all. Their argument sounds more like "there's nuance that you're glossing over."

It seems that we all agree PFAS are generally nasty chemicals, some worse than others. Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) is just one of the "nicer" ones.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can't make teflon without the PFAS though. It's like saying AIDS is completely different than HIV

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 0 points 3 weeks ago

no it's more like saying "desalinated water is fine, it's the brine that's problematic."

which is true.

and the same goes for teflon:

the PFAS are toxic, not teflon itself.

glossing over that distinction is disingenuous...

yes, you can't make one without the other, true, but the end product is not toxic. that's an important difference you can't just ignore in order to say teflon is toxic, because a requisite material in (cheap) production is toxic.

because that's like saying desalinated water is toxic, just because brine is toxic..which is obviously ridiculous.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

There is one important note: you won't get cancer from the Teflon in your pans. You get it from the PFAS used to produce the pans. This means you don't have to throw out all your pans, as if they were made from lead and asbestos. Just make sure not to buy new ones with Teflon.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 0 points 3 weeks ago

Teflon, on it's own is safe, the problem are the chemicals used to produce it.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Shareni@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's releasing a high amount of micro and nano plastics, and those are linked to different health issues including cancer.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724027232

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oxidative stress and inflammation is cancer?

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

At least 40% of human cancers are associated with aberrant ERK pathway activity (ERKp).

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-024-00554-5

ERK expression is critical for development and their hyperactivation plays a major role in cancer development and progression.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7027163/

Prolonged oxidative stress contributes to cancer initiation and progression through several biological mechanisms.

https://biologyinsights.com/oxidative-stress-and-cancer-whats-the-connection/

Oxidative stress, characterized by the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within cells, plays a critical role in the development of cancer by affecting genomic stability and signaling pathways within the cellular microenvironment.

https://biosignaling.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12964-023-01398-5

Inflammation predisposes to the development of cancer and promotes all stages of tumorigenesis.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6831096/

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago

So as much as breathing, coffee and the sun cause cancer?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, it might... but we haven't shown it does.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

teflon itself is proved safe. its production is what's causing all the problems.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

I had a waterproofing spray that said on it "Completely nontoxic ^when ^dry"

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In the same way Asbestos is a great material, just one small problem

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago

Asbestos itself is toxic. Teflon is inert.

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 0 points 3 weeks ago

We are too weak for the miracle of asbestos.